# Random Mafia

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/random-mafia/532942>\
**Category:** The Game Room\
**Created:** [March 18, 2010, 9:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/random-mafia/532942 "2010-03-18T21:47:56Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 992

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Drain\_Bead](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/e47774/32.png) [@Drain\_Bead](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Drain_Bead)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2010, 4:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/random-mafia/532942/992 "2010-04-07T16:04:24Z")

</div>

> [@Oredigger77](#):
>
> I went back and looked through Chronos and in general he’s pretty clean. I really can’t find anything besides through twisting his statement to mean more then face value. On the other hand I am getting seriously pinged by the things that have been brought up toDAy (missing the non and ignoring arguments but pushing a case).
> 
> For now I’m going to vote for him but I’m worried about creating another tie, we have time to break it, but I think the scum keep pushing us into situation where we have two strong candidates while they sit back and laugh.

This whole post REEKS. So you’ve got someone who is “pretty clean,” but you’re going to vote for him to create a tie, even though you don’t want to create a tie? Wow, talk about trying to create deniability. And nothing in there says you bothered to examine any of the other vote getters, or anyone else, for that matter. I am not liking this vote at all. Even if **Chronos** comes up Scum, which I think he is at this point, I still find this vote incredibly suspect.

---

_[View the full topic](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/random-mafia/532942)._