Rarest last name in America

I had a roommate whose middle name was America.

She was beautiful…

Hmmm. There is a place called Zzyzx in Southern California, but it appears to be a word made up by the guy who tried to lay claim to the land. I was not his name or anything like that. I have driven by the sign (on the 15 freeway) to the road to Zzyzx a few times. (I didn’t go down it. It is a long way, and there is apparently very little to be seen there.)

Kate Winslet is married to some guy named Ned Rocknroll. I’m hoping he’s the only one with that douchetastic last name.

I think what you mean is a relict.

:slight_smile:

The howmanyofme link says there are “1 or fewer” with my surname in the US. I know of 5.

My bet would be Argentines…
Basques often have similar names to Hispanics, but often do not see themselves as Hispanic, many Basques live in the Great Basin. Many Portuguese and some Italian names are identical to Spanish names. And finally some Spanish-Americans who have been in the U.S. for generations, like Louisiana Spanish settlers, find it odd to indentify as anything other than white/non-Hispanic.

I live in a heavily Hispanic area, and its sometimes funny to see the politics of surnames. In know quite a few very Latino people who - for reasons of marriage or a distant Italian/German/Jewish/French/Lebanese ancestor do not have a Spanish name. I know people who have Spanish names by marriage (including Anglo men who find it convenient to borrow the Spanish practice of adding the spouses surname after de, so a Fred Smith becomes Fred Smith de Márquez) or maybe just have a New Mexican “Spanish” great-great grandfather. So it is generally not a good idea to judge a person’s ethnicity by last name…yet, most people will leap to assumptions about another based on the name (a Rodriguez must speak Spanish, be brown, have tamales for Christmas…a Johnson must speak nothing but English, be white/black, have turkey dinner, etc.).

I generally see first names as a better indicator of actual ethnicity. Travis Gutierrez is probably going to be culturally Anglo…Jorge Petersen is probably going to know mole from pipián.

The great thing about life before Social Security (1936) and civil registration for births in the U.S. (as late as the 1920s) is you could basically spell your last name however you wanted. Or it may appear as what the census taker wanted it to be. I have an French ancestor who was Flecher, then Flitcher, and ultimately Fletcher in the census. One of those is very common, the other two would be rare names. That line left no male heirs, so the surname question went away. If he did have a son, my guess is that the pressure to have the most common surname would win out…and he’d be a Fletcher.

Waitaminnit! You mean that site now acknowledges that there are less that 117 of any name?

I had a dentist once whose name was Dr. DicKard (note the odd capitalization). Anyone seeing that would be inclined to pronounce it DikKARD (accent on second syllable), I very much suspect. I asked him about it. He said it was a corruption of DesCartes.

I was like :dubious: about that. I think the name was originally just Dickard, which anyone would likely pronounce DIKerd (accent on first syllable), and he probably just didn’t like that.

I doubt you can have one single winner for the rarest. There could be several Americans each with the only last name among their countrymen. I know of at least a couple naturalized Thai-Americans with tongue-twister surnames. Must be others from other countries too who have become American.

I did some searching on that site. It’ seems 99% of Hillary’s in America are female.

Oops! Never mind.

The “howmanyofme” site doesn’t track frequency of last names below 117 of them, and so will never tell anyone that there’s only 1 person with that last name. However, if you enter just a last name, it’ll assume that that’s your full name, and that you have no first name. It will then tell you that there is at most 1 person with your full name, that is to say, your last name with no first name.

You mean as a first name? I wonder what percentage are 21 or younger, having been named after Mrs. Clinton.

Why 117?

(Actually, it appears to be 118 now.)

Because they had room in their database for the top X names, and X was high enough to allow for names held by 118 people, but not by 117.

158 people in the U.S. with my last name, but I’m the only one with my first and last name combined.

More amusingly, if you Google just my last name, in the little preview of images, picture #2 is my Dad, and picture #6 is my brother.

I research friends for fun. I had a customer with the last name of Waicukewith. I asked him what nationality was the name and he said Lithuanian.

He and an unmarried daughter are all that exist in the US

Not accurate for my husband’s name. It says there’s only one of him in the US with that name but he’s a junior. It says there are two people with my name which I think is true. Though if you put my two formal names together I’m fairly sure I am the only person in the entire country with my name.

Good to know. I know without looking that I’m the only one with my first+last in the US.