# Real music died in the 1970s

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/real-music-died-in-the-1970s/944199>\
**Category:** Cafe Society\
**Tags:** music\
**Created:** [June 13, 2021, 11:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/real-music-died-in-the-1970s/944199 "2021-06-13T23:41:14Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 14

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Larry\_Borgia](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/larry_borgia/32/156_2.png) [@Larry\_Borgia](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Larry_Borgia)\
**Post date:** [June 18, 2021, 10:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/real-music-died-in-the-1970s/944199/263 "2021-06-18T22:23:17Z")

</div>

I think a lot of the “music was better in my day” attitude doesn’t have anything to do with music at all. It’s about missing your youth, when you were full of energy, hanging with your friends, getting crushes, etc. Well those years had a soundtrack and when you look back, you’ll hear it again. Modern music can’t do that for you.

It’s like when people complain that their city used to be gritty and real, and now it’s bland and gentrified.You don’t miss public transit as a dangerous adventure. You miss your youth.

This doesn’t apply if you _are_ young. But it will.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jophiel](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jophiel/32/66_2.png) [@Jophiel](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jophiel)\
**Post date:** [June 18, 2021, 10:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/real-music-died-in-the-1970s/944199/264 "2021-06-18T22:24:08Z")

</div>

I have no idea who will be well regarded in 50 years. I guess I don’t really care either since that doesn’t impact what I enjoy today.

I suspect whoever is considered influential from the 2000s will be in other genres adjacent to rock/pop. K-Pop or EDM or some form of hip-hop, etc. The named groups (Beatles, Stones, Pink Floyd, etc) had the advantage of getting into rock when it was young and there was still a lot of fertile ground to be sown for the first time. They also had the advantage of a much, much smaller pool without 60,000 songs a day being added. So maybe some of today’s artists, if flung back in time, would be equally influential given those circumstances. Which is why I assume that the pioneers of 2001-2010 will be from other genres that haven’t been gone over for decades.

This isn’t to discredit the talent of early rock musicians but expecting someone to replicate it now is, like I said before, insisting that a modern explorer replicate the feats of Marco Polo or Magellan or Columbus to be considered worthwhile.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Pleonast](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pleonast/32/1183_2.png) [@Pleonast](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Pleonast)\
**Post date:** [June 18, 2021, 10:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/real-music-died-in-the-1970s/944199/265 "2021-06-18T22:26:34Z")

</div>

> [@Whack-a-Mole](#):
>
> The problem is, a more narrow field means fewer “good” songs (whatever that means to you).
> 
> If the field is wide you have more options. Can be exposed to more new things. You might find you like some.

I think you are conflating musical quality with musical preference. They are both subjective, but are different things. One can recognize that a particular piece of music is well made (quality) but find it distasteful (preference). Or conversely, poorly made music can be appreciated.

Increased variety of music improves the chances of finding something that satisfies one’s preferences. But doesn’t lead to any conclusions about the quality.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Whack-a-Mole](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/whack-a-mole/32/141_2.png) [@Whack-a-Mole](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Whack-a-Mole)\
**Post date:** [June 18, 2021, 10:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/real-music-died-in-the-1970s/944199/266 "2021-06-18T22:31:58Z")

</div>

> [@Jophiel](#):
>
> The named groups (Beatles, Stones, Pink Floyd, etc) had the advantage of getting into rock when it was young and there was still a lot of fertile ground to be sown for the first time.

> [@Jophiel](#):
>
> Hell, if you LIKE Top 100 music today, you could make a strong case that _SCIENCE!_ shows that music today is far superior to music in the 70s since we’ve learned how to eliminate the chaff, stop faffing around with pointlessly bloated lyric compositions and put out more effective tunes. I mean, it makes more sense that you’d get better at producing stuff over time then worse at it, right?

So, do musicians improve over time or did they come out of the gate doing the best music possible for that new(ish) genre and everything else is a footnote?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![scabpicker](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/scabpicker/32/8268_2.png) [@scabpicker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/scabpicker)\
**Post date:** [June 18, 2021, 10:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/real-music-died-in-the-1970s/944199/267 "2021-06-18T22:36:18Z")

</div>

> [@scabpicker](#):
>
> You may not like them, but I think these two have a shot (and remember popular != influential ).

Oh, and if you’d like a cite for influence, here’s Muse\* covering Lightning bolt. It’s not simple, at all.

[![](https://img.youtube.com/vi/eM3FDvE-NzI/hqdefault.jpg "Dracula Mountain (Cover 2004) - Muse") ](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eM3FDvE-NzI)

\*They’ve been around awhile, but my 17 year old niece likes 'em enough that they were her first concert.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jophiel](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jophiel/32/66_2.png) [@Jophiel](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jophiel)\
**Post date:** [June 18, 2021, 10:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/real-music-died-in-the-1970s/944199/268 "2021-06-18T22:38:21Z")

</div>

> [@Whack-a-Mole](#):
>
> So, do musicians improve over time or did they come out of the gate doing the best music possible for that new(ish) genre and everything else is a footnote?

You’re conflating different things.

The first quote is saying that you can only be groundbreaking once and there’s only so much ground to break. Demanding a new Beatles in rock music is foolish. If you truly want new and groundbreaking, turn to a new genre.

The second quote is saying that trying to turn “Science says…” into “Music shallow” or “Music dumb” or whatever is relying on someone liking older music more. If someone likes today’s music and hates that old stuff, they could take the opposite tack and be just as valid. I _personally_ enjoy at least some rock/pop from most decades and don’t think it has progressively gotten better or worse.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Whack-a-Mole](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/whack-a-mole/32/141_2.png) [@Whack-a-Mole](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Whack-a-Mole)\
**Post date:** [June 18, 2021, 10:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/real-music-died-in-the-1970s/944199/269 "2021-06-18T22:41:14Z")

</div>

I really do not want to go 20-rounds on this but you did say that they would get better at producing stuff.

Then you say not really. Which is fine. I agree a lot more with this post than the one where you said they get better over time.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jophiel](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jophiel/32/66_2.png) [@Jophiel](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jophiel)\
**Post date:** [June 18, 2021, 10:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/real-music-died-in-the-1970s/944199/270 "2021-06-18T22:52:38Z")

</div>

> [@Whack-a-Mole](#):
>
> I really do not want to go 20-rounds on this but you did say that they would get better at producing stuff.

Go back and read. Or don’t. I said “Hell, if you LIKE Top 100 music today, you could make a strong case that _SCIENCE!_ shows that music today is far superior to music in the 70s…”

I didn’t say that this was _my_ argument. I was saying that trying to use “But Science!” was stupid no matter which way you flipped it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Whack-a-Mole](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/whack-a-mole/32/141_2.png) [@Whack-a-Mole](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Whack-a-Mole)\
**Post date:** [June 18, 2021, 10:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/real-music-died-in-the-1970s/944199/271 "2021-06-18T22:54:43Z")

</div>

> [@Jophiel](#):
>
> I didn’t say that this was _my_ argument. I was saying that trying to use “But Science!” was stupid no matter which way you flipped it.

I’m curious…

Do you think there is no objective way to decide good music from bad?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![EinsteinsHund](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/einsteinshund/32/8400_2.png) [@EinsteinsHund](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/EinsteinsHund)\
**Post date:** [June 18, 2021, 10:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/real-music-died-in-the-1970s/944199/272 "2021-06-18T22:58:09Z")

</div>

> [@Whack-a-Mole](#):
>
> Do you think there is no objective way to decide good music from bad?

Very obviously there isn’t. Music ain’t science.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jophiel](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jophiel/32/66_2.png) [@Jophiel](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jophiel)\
**Post date:** [June 18, 2021, 11:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/real-music-died-in-the-1970s/944199/273 "2021-06-18T23:01:43Z")

</div>

> [@Whack-a-Mole](#):
>
> Do you think there is no objective way to decide good music from bad?

Of course there isn’t. Why would there be? You can objectively say that music is popular or made a lot of money and I suppose you could make an argument for music being influential. Good or bad is up to the individual listener though.

But none of the stuff being cited as “evidence” is purporting to say music is objectively good or bad either; that’s mainly the work of the clickbait title writers. And the conclusions you’re reaching from it seem especially misguided when you lament how few dishes are at your buffet in an era where a new song is being uploaded to streaming services nearly every second.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Whack-a-Mole](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/whack-a-mole/32/141_2.png) [@Whack-a-Mole](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Whack-a-Mole)\
**Post date:** [June 18, 2021, 11:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/real-music-died-in-the-1970s/944199/274 "2021-06-18T23:02:37Z")

</div>

So me banging my hands randomly on a piano keyboard is objectively as good as, say, a Tchaikovsky piano concerto?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Pleonast](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pleonast/32/1183_2.png) [@Pleonast](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Pleonast)\
**Post date:** [June 18, 2021, 11:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/real-music-died-in-the-1970s/944199/275 "2021-06-18T23:05:19Z")

</div>

I’d have to hear it before subjectively deciding which is better.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![EinsteinsHund](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/einsteinshund/32/8400_2.png) [@EinsteinsHund](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/EinsteinsHund)\
**Post date:** [June 18, 2021, 11:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/real-music-died-in-the-1970s/944199/276 "2021-06-18T23:06:46Z")

</div>

> [@Whack-a-Mole](#):
>
> So me banging my hands randomly on a piano keyboard is objectively as good as, say, a Tchaikovsky piano concerto?

No, that’s just cacophony, but whether you like a three-chord Ramones song or Beethoven’s Ninth doesn’t say anything about the inner quality of the music.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jophiel](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jophiel/32/66_2.png) [@Jophiel](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jophiel)\
**Post date:** [June 18, 2021, 11:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/real-music-died-in-the-1970s/944199/277 "2021-06-18T23:07:00Z")

</div>

> [@Whack-a-Mole](#):
>
> So me banging my hands randomly on a piano keyboard is objectively as good as, say, a Tchaikovsky piano concerto?

To someone, I’m sure.

“Whack-A-Mole’s raw and unfettered performance struck me in fundamental ways that Tchaikovsky never could!”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Whack-a-Mole](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/whack-a-mole/32/141_2.png) [@Whack-a-Mole](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Whack-a-Mole)\
**Post date:** [June 18, 2021, 11:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/real-music-died-in-the-1970s/944199/278 "2021-06-18T23:07:39Z")

</div>

> [@Jophiel](#):
>
> To someone, I’m sure.

But is it objectively as good to you? It has as much musical value as Tchaikovsky’s Piano Concerto No. 1. You have no way of expressing which is better objectively. You can only tell us your personal preference.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jophiel](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jophiel/32/66_2.png) [@Jophiel](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jophiel)\
**Post date:** [June 18, 2021, 11:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/real-music-died-in-the-1970s/944199/279 "2021-06-18T23:12:11Z")

</div>

> [@Whack-a-Mole](#):
>
> You have no way of expressing which is better objectively. You can only tell us your personal preference.

Correct. I have no objective metric for determining which one someone is more “correct” to enjoy. If asked which one someone should play at their dinner party, I would recommend the Concerto based on my knowledge of social situations but I’d do the same over Atom Heart Mother.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![scabpicker](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/scabpicker/32/8268_2.png) [@scabpicker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/scabpicker)\
**Post date:** [June 18, 2021, 11:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/real-music-died-in-the-1970s/944199/280 "2021-06-18T23:12:36Z")

</div>

> [@Whack-a-Mole](#):
>
> But is it objectively as good to you? It has as much musical value as Tchaikovsky’s Piano Concerto No. 1. You have no way of expressing which is better objectively. You can only tell us your personal preference

Yep. Welcome to art. It ain’t objective.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Elmer\_J.Fudd](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/elmer_j.fudd/32/1211_2.png) [@Elmer\_J.Fudd](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Elmer_J.Fudd)\
**Post date:** [June 18, 2021, 11:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/real-music-died-in-the-1970s/944199/281 "2021-06-18T23:21:46Z")

</div>

Can we all agree that Real Player died in the 1990s?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Whack-a-Mole](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/whack-a-mole/32/141_2.png) [@Whack-a-Mole](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Whack-a-Mole)\
**Post date:** [June 18, 2021, 11:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/real-music-died-in-the-1970s/944199/282 "2021-06-18T23:22:33Z")

</div>

So schools that teach music theory are all bunk? Studying what humans like (such as melodies) is not objective because there may be one person who likes discordant sounds? 🙄

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/real-music-died-in-the-1970s/944199.md?page=13)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/real-music-died-in-the-1970s/944199.md?page=15)
