# Really? Or, Pics From Sex And The City Movie Sequel (Really?) **URL:** \ **Category:** Cafe Society\ **Created:** [September 12, 2009, 2:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/really-or-pics-from-sex-and-the-city-movie-sequel-really/509819 "2009-09-12T14:01:53Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 35
**Author:** ![Zhen\_ka](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/z/ecccb3/32.png) [@Zhen\_ka](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Zhen_ka)\ **Post date:** [September 13, 2009, 5:33am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/really-or-pics-from-sex-and-the-city-movie-sequel-really/509819/35 "2009-09-13T05:33:47Z")
> [@Rubystreak](#): > > That’s nice. Thanks. Why not leave your personal attacks at home? I actually watch the show, so why not take issue with those commenting who don’t? They aren’t actually adding anything to the discussion, just slagging off on a show that pisses them off. I would think it would be them with the baggage, no? > > ETA: Thanks, Lamia, for demonstrating my point about who has the baggage here. Also, the OP isn’t about CGI being used to make actors look younger, it’s about how ugly the actresses are, so… No personal attacks. The thread is about photographs of actresses in a movie that depicts them in the past. I am interested in how CGI may make these actresses (and actors) look younger in the film. You are the only poster here who seems intent on making this into an argument on “looks” or age. (I have no baggage with Lamia). If you want to open yet another thread on SITC, have at it. I didn’t want to see this one turn into one of your multi-page dramas. Can we please get back on topic? --- _[View the full topic](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/really-or-pics-from-sex-and-the-city-movie-sequel-really/509819)._