# Recommend me the best Watergate book

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/recommend-me-the-best-watergate-book/271136>\
**Category:** In My Humble Opinion\
**Created:** [October 25, 2004, 10:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/recommend-me-the-best-watergate-book/271136 "2004-10-25T22:29:44Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 4\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Hedda\_Rosa](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/hedda_rosa/32/1204_2.png) [@Hedda\_Rosa](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Hedda_Rosa)\
**Post date:** [October 25, 2004, 10:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/recommend-me-the-best-watergate-book/271136/1 "2004-10-25T22:29:44Z")

</div>

What is the best book to give me a real grasp on Watergate? I’ve just finished _All the President’s Men_, and while I know have a good idea about how the story evolved in the Post, I’m still pretty damn fuzzy on the actual timeline and what really was done by the people involved, beginning to end. Plus it doesn’t follow all the way to Nixon’s resignation.

There are a ton of Watergate books at my library; I’d like to only read one or two more to round out my understanding of what exactly happened.

Thanks,

Twiddle

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bonzer](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/45deac/32.png) [@bonzer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bonzer)\
**Post date:** [October 26, 2004, 1:04am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/recommend-me-the-best-watergate-book/271136/2 "2004-10-26T01:04:39Z")

</div>

_Watergate_ (1994) by Fred Emery, hands-down. He was the London _Times_ Washington correspondent at the time, but this was written to accompany the series he made for the BBC at the time of the 20th anniversary. They managed to persuade most of the original participants to be interviewed on camera and the resulting TV series was superb.  
The book is thus written by a distinguished foreign journalist who covered the original events, but is also targeted at an audience that he can’t assume know the background or the full timeline. He thus choses to tell the story chronologically from the start to the end. The narrative is fairly light on analysis - Emery doesn’t have much of an explicit argument to develop - but he is writing in the wake of most of the memoirs and, as I say, had interviewed virtually everybody, so he has been able to weigh the different accounts.  
It’s hardly the final word on the subject, but it’s an excellent and comprehensive guide through the whole chain of events.

And, of course, _The Final Days_ does allow Woodward and Bernstein to memorably tell the end of the story, right up to the departure of the helicopter.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Hedda\_Rosa](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/hedda_rosa/32/1204_2.png) [@Hedda\_Rosa](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Hedda_Rosa)\
**Post date:** [October 26, 2004, 2:48am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/recommend-me-the-best-watergate-book/271136/3 "2004-10-26T02:48:24Z")

</div>

> [@bonzer](#):
>
> And, of course, _The Final Days_ does allow Woodward and Bernstein to memorably tell the end of the story, right up to the departure of the helicopter.

Thanks! I hadn’t heard of this so I’ll have to go looking for it at the library along with your suggestion of _Watergate_.

Twiddle

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lizard](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/dfb087/32.png) [@Lizard](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lizard)\
**Post date:** [October 26, 2004, 3:56am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/recommend-me-the-best-watergate-book/271136/4 "2004-10-26T03:56:07Z")

</div>

> [@bonzer](#):
>
> And, of course, _The Final Days_ does allow Woodward and Bernstein to memorably tell the end of the story, right up to the departure of the helicopter.

**Twiddle** , be warned: _The Final Days_ is nothing like _All the President’s Men_. While AtPM reads like an exciting, fast-paced detective story, with keenly observed examples of journalism craft, TFD is an unbelievably detailed (and unbelievably boring) recap of almost every imaginable detail from Nixon’s last days in office. It’s kind of like porno for political geeks.  
The book indulges in excruciating minutiae to such a degree that I’m surprised they didn’t tabulate the number of Nixon’s bowel movements. It has absolutely none of the people/characters from AtPM, nor the sense of excitement in solving a mystery. I found it to be a painful, uninteresting slog.

On a side note, I love your handle!
