# Regarding Muslim fundies

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/regarding-muslim-fundies/248382>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [June 3, 2004, 2:18am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/regarding-muslim-fundies/248382 "2004-06-03T02:18:14Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Aldebaran](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/c6cbf5/32.png) [@Aldebaran](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Aldebaran)\
**Post date:** [June 3, 2004, 10:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/regarding-muslim-fundies/248382/41 "2004-06-03T22:42:52Z")

</div>

gum,

I know all about that and about other such lunatics. What they write is of course available, yet it has no meaning other then that it is what they write.

You must deliver proof that they are official representatives for Islam and that what they write is what Islam teaches.  
Salaam.A

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![El\_Kabong](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/el_kabong/32/496_2.png) [@El\_Kabong](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/El_Kabong)\
**Post date:** [June 3, 2004, 10:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/regarding-muslim-fundies/248382/42 "2004-06-03T22:48:40Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> What some raving idiot in the Netherlands “says” is only what that idiot says. Not what Islam “says”. His influence goes not further then what people want to give it.

The “raving idiot”, as you put it, represents himself as a cleric; that is, one who has pursued religious studies, guides people in worship and offers himself as an official interpreter of Islam for other adherants. If you disagree with this definition of a cleric, that’s fine; please supply your own more correct definition. Here is your chance to fight ignorance for once, rather than hurl your usual insults: please describe the role of an Islamic cleric for those of us who, in your view, misunderstand.

While you are at it, as I’m sure you know, most major Christian denominations have a hierarchy of high level that determines how issues of doctrine are dealt with by individual ministers. What you seem to be implying here is that there is no such hierarchy within Islam: in other words, that the words of any particular cleric on a religious issue have equal weight. In the case of the Dutch Imam, and assuming what he is saying is an incorrect interpretation of Islamic principles, who decides that this is so? Do other clerics speak out against him? Is there a committee that issues some sort of ruling that says he is incorrect?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Zagadka](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/zagadka/32/7272_2.png) [@Zagadka](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Zagadka)\
**Post date:** [June 3, 2004, 10:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/regarding-muslim-fundies/248382/43 "2004-06-03T22:51:50Z")

</div>

> [@El\_Kabong](#):
>
> The “raving idiot”, as you put it, represents himself as a cleric; that is, one who has pursued religious studies, guides people in worship and offers himself as an official interpreter of Islam for other adherants. If you disagree with this definition of a cleric, that’s fine; please supply your own more correct definition. Here is your chance to fight ignorance for once, rather than hurl your usual insults: please describe the role of an Islamic cleric for those of us who, in your view, misunderstand.

I believe, in a word, what Alde would call the “raving idiot” an “imposter” - one who makes false claims to represent an ideology and spreads his political agenda under that guise.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![El\_Kabong](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/el_kabong/32/496_2.png) [@El\_Kabong](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/El_Kabong)\
**Post date:** [June 3, 2004, 10:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/regarding-muslim-fundies/248382/44 "2004-06-03T22:52:03Z")

</div>

First sentence of second para should read:

> [@](#):
>
> While you are at it, as I’m sure you know, most major Christian denominations have a hierarchy of high level clerics that determine how issues of doctrine are dealt with by individual ministers.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gum](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/bbe5ce/32.png) [@gum](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gum)\
**Post date:** [June 3, 2004, 10:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/regarding-muslim-fundies/248382/45 "2004-06-03T22:56:48Z")

</div>

Aldebaran, [umm, mods: Am I allowed to remark Alde’s post, isn’t very intelligent?]

Proof? An Imam is selling those books. An Imam is \*\* teaching that to young kids\*\* You wanna say there’s no such person as Imam El Shershaby of the Amsterdam mosque, El Tawheed?  
You wanna say the whole government of the Netherlands is hallucinating?

You want me to ask the Imam to write you a letter? In a language you’ve studied?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gum](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/bbe5ce/32.png) [@gum](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gum)\
**Post date:** [June 3, 2004, 11:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/regarding-muslim-fundies/248382/46 "2004-06-03T23:03:40Z")

</div>

Originally posted by \*\* Zagadka\*\*

> [@](#):
>
> - I believe, in a word, what Alde would call the “raving idiot” an “imposter” - one who makes false claims to represent an ideology and spreads his political agenda under that guise. \*

Believe what you like. Fact is: That Imam teaches hundreds of kids the islam.

He teaches them to throw homosexuals head first off high buildings. If not killed on hitting the ground, they should then be stoned to death.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![El\_Kabong](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/el_kabong/32/496_2.png) [@El\_Kabong](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/El_Kabong)\
**Post date:** [June 3, 2004, 11:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/regarding-muslim-fundies/248382/47 "2004-06-03T23:04:40Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> I believe, in a word, what Alde would call the “raving idiot” an “imposter” - one who makes false claims to represent an ideology and spreads his political agenda under that guise.

I get that part. What I am asking is, is there any scholarly or doctrinal body within islam that has authority to identify the Imam as (in their view) an imposter?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gum](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/bbe5ce/32.png) [@gum](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gum)\
**Post date:** [June 3, 2004, 11:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/regarding-muslim-fundies/248382/48 "2004-06-03T23:17:54Z")

</div>

[El\_Kablong\*\* The extremists Imams are organized in the Islamic Ahl-Soennah  
Committee for Europe Foundation in Amsterdam[They don’t think he’s an imposter.](http://mailgate.supereva.it/soc/soc.culture.romanian/msg72477.html)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![alaricthegoth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/4bbf92/32.png) [@alaricthegoth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/alaricthegoth)\
**Post date:** [June 3, 2004, 11:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/regarding-muslim-fundies/248382/49 "2004-06-03T23:21:31Z")

</div>

> [@gum](#):
>
> Aldebaran, [umm, mods: Am I allowed to remark Alde’s post, isn’t very intelligent?]
> 
> Proof? An Imam is selling those books. An Imam is \*\* teaching that to young kids\*\* You wanna say there’s no such person as Imam El Shershaby of the Amsterdam mosque, El Tawheed?  
> You wanna say the whole government of the Netherlands is hallucinating?
> 
> You want me to ask the Imam to write you a letter? In a language you’ve studied?

I think that the quibble is directed at the (straw)issue of the extent to which THIS muslim may be said to stand for ISLAM.

I would offer (tentatively) the following:

Altho there is no central authority, the comingling of state and mosque must result, at least on a national level, in some recognized repository of “orthodoxy”, if only as that is reflected by state financial support of the particular institution (school, mosque, etc.)

In Iran, of course, it is formalized as the council of guardians.

Do not the muslims of holland have any proto-clerical association that would, in the “happy” event of the arrival of an Dutch Islamic Republic morph into a national organized body?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Zagadka](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/zagadka/32/7272_2.png) [@Zagadka](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Zagadka)\
**Post date:** [June 3, 2004, 11:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/regarding-muslim-fundies/248382/50 "2004-06-03T23:23:07Z")

</div>

> [@gum](#):
>
> Originally posted by \*\* Zagadka\*\* Believe what you like. Fact is: That Imam teaches hundreds of kids the islam.
> 
> He teaches them to throw homosexuals head first off high buildings. If not killed on hitting the ground, they should then be stoned to death.

And the KKK advocates hanging blacks from trees. Doesn’t mean they represent Christianity.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gum](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/bbe5ce/32.png) [@gum](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gum)\
**Post date:** [June 3, 2004, 11:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/regarding-muslim-fundies/248382/51 "2004-06-03T23:41:38Z")

</div>

posted by **Zagadka**

> [@](#):
>
> - And the KKK advocates hanging blacks from trees. Doesn’t mean they represent Christianity\*

That’s by far the most bizarre thing I’ve heard. There’s a difference between advocating and teaching. The KKK doesn’t teach young children in authorised governmental institutes, do they?

posted by\*\* alaricthegoth\*\*

> [@](#):
>
> - I think that the quibble is directed at the (straw)issue of the extent to which THIS muslim may be said to stand for ISLAM.\*

It is a straw issue. THAT muslim is an IMAM. He teaches the ISLAM. Legally.

No-one in the council of guardians in Iran has denounced him. He’s here. And thanks to our freedom of religion, he’ll stay here and teach children to become murderers.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Zagadka](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/zagadka/32/7272_2.png) [@Zagadka](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Zagadka)\
**Post date:** [June 3, 2004, 11:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/regarding-muslim-fundies/248382/52 "2004-06-03T23:50:06Z")

</div>

> [@gum](#):
>
> posted by **Zagadka** That’s by far the most bizarre thing I’ve heard. There’s a difference between advocating and teaching. The KKK doesn’t teach young children in authorised governmental institutes, do they?

Not openly, anymore, but not so long ago, there existed a status in many states where KKK members basically ran local government AND churches. But hte last time I checked, the US gov’t doesn’t teach young children ANY religion in “authorized governmental institutes”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Atticus\_Finch](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/ec9cab/32.png) [@Atticus\_Finch](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Atticus_Finch)\
**Post date:** [June 3, 2004, 11:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/regarding-muslim-fundies/248382/53 "2004-06-03T23:52:01Z")

</div>

> [@El\_Kabong](#):
>
> …please describe the role of an Islamic cleric for those of us who, in your view, misunderstand.
> 
> While you are at it, as I’m sure you know, most major Christian denominations have a hierarchy of high level that determines how issues of doctrine are dealt with by individual ministers. What you seem to be implying here is that there is no such hierarchy within Islam: in other words, that the words of any particular cleric on a religious issue have equal weight. In the case of the Dutch Imam, and assuming what he is saying is an incorrect interpretation of Islamic principles, who decides that this is so? Do other clerics speak out against him? Is there a committee that issues some sort of ruling that says he is incorrect?

There are large differences between Muslim and Christian clerics. There is no set hierarchy (the word itself means an order of priests) in Islam; that is, there is no ‘pope’, ‘bishops’ etc, but merely local clerics who have only the following they can gain with their own words and their own piousness. There is no organised church and no notion that religious law can emanate from anything other than God’s words, as interpreted by religious scholars (as opposed to divinely-inspired but specifically human-created dogma in some Christian churches).

Thus, a Muslim cleric might only be superior to another in that he is more respected, and thus his interpretation of divine law is more respected. There is no committee that can overrule him, though a committee of other clerics might be seen to be more learned and respectable, and thus more authoritative. Think of it like academia - there isn’t an international committee of academics in, say, music, which can formally overrule a professor of music. All they can do is argue that his analysis of Brahms’ Lullaby is not good, and present their own case.

This only goes for mainstream Sunni Muslims. The Shi’a have somewhat of a hierarchy, as do some smaller sects.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gum](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/bbe5ce/32.png) [@gum](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gum)\
**Post date:** [June 3, 2004, 11:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/regarding-muslim-fundies/248382/54 "2004-06-03T23:52:30Z")

</div>

I’m off to bed. It’s nearly 2:00.

I hope you’re not too much in shock, due to the fact that a left-winger is refusing to kiss ass with fundamentalistic Imams who teach hate.

Goodnight.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gum](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/bbe5ce/32.png) [@gum](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gum)\
**Post date:** [June 3, 2004, 11:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/regarding-muslim-fundies/248382/55 "2004-06-03T23:54:37Z")

</div>

**Zagadka** : Very lame.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Zagadka](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/zagadka/32/7272_2.png) [@Zagadka](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Zagadka)\
**Post date:** [June 4, 2004, 12:04am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/regarding-muslim-fundies/248382/56 "2004-06-04T00:04:03Z")

</div>

> [@gum](#):
>
> **Zagadka** : Very lame.

The Pit is 3 doors down the hall, on the right. We try to respond with actual “thinking” here.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sqweels](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/f19dbf/32.png) [@sqweels](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/sqweels)\
**Post date:** [June 4, 2004, 12:16am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/regarding-muslim-fundies/248382/57 "2004-06-04T00:16:46Z")

</div>

**Aldebaran** :

> [@](#):
>
> Wrong. “Hate” is not a teaching of Islam. The same with violence. Violence is only condoned under certain circumstances who are very well dezscribed and defined.

Never said it was. Hatred and violence are natural human conditions that can be _led to_ by exessive strictness in enforcing the precepts of just about any ideological dogma. I would say that one characteristic of fundamentalism is the emphasis on the negative aspects of the dogma–strictness in personal morality, disagreeing with science, making enemies of liberals, etc.

> [@](#):
>
> The problem is that people like you can not look what is behind the “USA=Satan” screaming.

Can you blame me?

> [@](#):
>
> You seem to transfer what I say about the connection between “terrorist” and “fundamentalist Muslim” to this issue.

Most fundamentalist Muslims and most fundamentalist Christians are anti-gay. Only a small percentage of either are extremist enough to become terrorists. The phenomena called “religious fundamentalism” that we’re analyzing is fairly complex but there \*are \* common threads.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![El\_Kabong](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/el_kabong/32/496_2.png) [@El\_Kabong](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/El_Kabong)\
**Post date:** [June 4, 2004, 1:01am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/regarding-muslim-fundies/248382/58 "2004-06-04T01:01:24Z")

</div>

> [@lambchops](#):
>
> There are large differences between Muslim and Christian clerics. There is no set hierarchy (the word itself means an order of priests) in Islam; that is, there is no ‘pope’, ‘bishops’ etc, but merely local clerics who have only the following they can gain with their own words and their own piousness. There is no organised church and no notion that religious law can emanate from anything other than God’s words, as interpreted by religious scholars (as opposed to divinely-inspired but specifically human-created dogma in some Christian churches).
> 
> Thus, a Muslim cleric might only be superior to another in that he is more respected, and thus his interpretation of divine law is more respected. There is no committee that can overrule him, though a committee of other clerics might be seen to be more learned and respectable, and thus more authoritative. Think of it like academia - there isn’t an international committee of academics in, say, music, which can formally overrule a professor of music. All they can do is argue that his analysis of Brahms’ Lullaby is not good, and present their own case.
> 
> This only goes for mainstream Sunni Muslims. The Shi’a have somewhat of a hierarchy, as do some smaller sects.

Right, that’s pretty much what I was curious about, and thanks for the explanation. In any event, while I’ve known enough muslims to understand that the views of the referenced Dutch Imam are not exactly mainstream, there is still a dilemma here: the Imam, and presumably some followers, apparently personally believe they are following the tenets of Islam. Who can say they are not? I see no particular reason to accept **Aldebaran’s** statement that they are not Islamic at all as factual, as this is merely his personal interpretation, not necessarily the judgement of any generally accepted doctrinal authority or even a majority of other adherants.

The same, I think, can be said of terrorists who have claimed to be carrying out their acts based on their interpretations of religious principles. Probably not bin Laden, for example, since he apparently is not in fact a cleric, but my understanding is that some (few maybe, but some) clerics support his organization.

Please note that I am not by any means saying, as some seem to have said here, that all muslims are responsible for the acts of these few, nor that there is something inherently “wrong” with Islam (other than that it is a religion, and blind obedience to illogical religious rules is silly in my view); just that the assertion that these people are “not Islamic” is pretty much meaningless. They think they are Islamic, their followers think they are Islamic, there’s no accepted authority to say otherwise, so hey, they’re Islamic.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Marley23](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/45deac/32.png) [@Marley23](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Marley23)\
**Post date:** [June 4, 2004, 1:52am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/regarding-muslim-fundies/248382/59 "2004-06-04T01:52:09Z")

</div>

> [@Aldebaran](#):
>
> Wrong. People who rewrite a religion in order to create out of it one that fits their goals yet THAT has no theological foundation in the original teachings, are not fundamentalist believers of that religion.

What are they, then? I don’t see them rewriting a religion so much as ignoring some parts and playing up others.

> [@](#):
>
> How can you claim they are?

I’m taking their word for it. What would you call the Taliban government in Afghanistan and the government in Saudi Arabia if not fundamentalist Islam?

> [@](#):
>
> If I rewrite say: Hinduism, until it fits my political goals for using it, then I am a fundamentalist hindu?

The problem is that I don’t see a total rewriting of Islam here, and I don’t think Islam is completely separable from their goals. And if you actually did accept some of the basic teachings of Hinduism and argued in favor of a strict, literal interpretation of Hindu scripture, yes, you could probably be called a fundamentalist.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DMC](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dmc/32/18049_2.png) [@DMC](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DMC)\
**Post date:** [June 4, 2004, 5:23am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/regarding-muslim-fundies/248382/60 "2004-06-04T05:23:20Z")

</div>

> [@gum](#):
>
> This is an Imam, who teaches young muslims. He sells books in his mosque. Books like “The Way of the Muslim”
> 
> …
> 
> Don’t tell me that idiot has no influence. He teaches young kids, fer crying out loud.

There is a preacher, who teaches young christians. He sells tapes in his church. Tapes like “Intolerance of, Discrimination Against and the Death Penalty for Homosexuals is prescribed in the Bible”

Don’t tell me that idiot has no influence. He teaches young kids, fer crying out loud. (Don’t forget, Sunday School is at 9:30 every Sunday morning).

Yes, this is in America. No, the government has not closed his church. His name is Pete Peters, and he arguably has a much broader audience nationwide than the Imam above. He’s been on syndicated radio, the cover of magazines, and even has an outreach program. Oh, he’s also an asshole, and doesn’t speak for most, or even many, christians. With that said, he’s also far from the only example in this country.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/regarding-muslim-fundies/248382.md?page=2)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/regarding-muslim-fundies/248382.md?page=4)
