With your stick to Alpha Centuri, under ideal conditions and avoiding all the little real-world complications, yes! Rather a lot of years later, in fact.
This idea was suggested in several Sci-fi novels as some means of interstellar FTL communications. It doesn’t work because it ignores the wave nature of particles/matter.
That’s exactly why I proposed it during the discussion with my friend. I was thinking, hey, if the stick moves instantaneously, well, faster than light communication!
Now, though, my ignorance has been cruelly stomped on. <sob>
Just out of curiosity, could you name some?
Sorry, I cannot. I recall it being mentioned, actually, in a book on sci-fi novels and sci-fi technology, IIRC called “Amazing Stories - The science in science fiction” or somesuch. It has been a number of years since I sold the book to a used book store but i remember the example fairly well. Unfortunately an Amazon search turns up nothing.
The freight train analogy might be confusing, because the couplers are deliberately left very loose (compared to a passenger train) to enable the locomotives to overcome the inertia of each stationary wagon one by one. This is different to the stretching of the train’s components themselves, which happens like the stick, taking place at the speed of sound. The couplers stretch at the speed of the just-beginning-to-move train, and that’s only about walking pace. The stationary train is shorter than the moving one, because their are air gaps in the couplers which will no longer exist when the locomotives are under load.
They guy on Alpha C is gonna have to listen real close to hear you tapping on your end of the stick.
Surely what happens then is that you have sound waves going in both directions along the stick. Doesn’t this happen in a lot of quite ordinary media (including gases, liquids and solids)? And the stick doesn’t break unless the combined stretching of the two sound waves exceeds its limits at some point.
Actually, the same thing would happen if just one end is pulled. The far end of the stick is effectively immobile because it isn’t going to move for a long time.
Someone sign that guy up for the 'Dope; I like the way he thinks.
[QUOTE=chorpler]
Peter Morris, you thievin’ rascal, I posed this exact same question (really, almost word-for-word exact)
Danm! I was about to ask the same question too!!!
Starting a train and braking it are two different animals. In braking, each car has a set of air brakes and all are actuated by releasing the pressure in the brake line. This isn’t precisely simultanerous with all cars, but is is a different mechanism than having slack in the couplings and starting to pull from one end. In short, each car has a stopper but not a starter.
The analogy of starting the train by pulling on one end and the way that a rod actually moves is a good one. Think of the stick as a long chain of little bits of incremental lengths all connected with strong, massless springs. You can see that second incremental bit won’t start to move until the first one has moved far enough to compress or extend the string far enough so that it exerts a force on it. This is all merely a way of illustrating that nothing is infinitely rigid.
Right. It’s not hard to conceptualize that a long rod made out of Jell-o from here to Proxima Centauri would take a long time for a push at one end to be transmitted to the other. It’s just hard to visualize it with a wooden pole because we inherently think of it as solid and rigid. Of course it isn’t. Or perhaps they both are. It’s just a matter of degrees.
Surprised no one has brought up Superluminal Scissors in this thread. A bit different experiment than that posed in the OP but the question at issue is the same.