# Remember that talk of Democrats working for unity? Heh.

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/remember-that-talk-of-democrats-working-for-unity-heh/387091>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [January 7, 2007, 11:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/remember-that-talk-of-democrats-working-for-unity-heh/387091 "2007-01-07T23:41:23Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Mace](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_mace/32/185_2.png) [@John\_Mace](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Mace)\
**Post date:** [January 8, 2007, 12:54am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/remember-that-talk-of-democrats-working-for-unity-heh/387091/21 "2007-01-08T00:54:12Z")

</div>

Eh. The “6 for '06” proposals aren’t all that controversial, and the ones they’ve pushed thru so far got plenty of votes from the Republicans. Let’s give the Dems a few months to establish a track record and see how things work out. I just don’t see it as that big a deal that the Dems wanted to get their key agenda items voted on quickly. If there’s anything the Republicans have major heartburn over, Bush can veto it. Personally, I’m loving this whole divided government thing.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Uncommon\_Sense](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/f9ae1b/32.png) [@Uncommon\_Sense](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Uncommon_Sense)\
**Post date:** [January 8, 2007, 12:55am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/remember-that-talk-of-democrats-working-for-unity-heh/387091/22 "2007-01-08T00:55:43Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Pochacco]  
That’s funny. I don’t remember many Democrats running on a platform of bi-partisanship last year. Mostly they ran on “the Republicans are a bunch of screw-ups and we can do better.”

The Republicans had their turn. They fucked things up. Now the remaining Republicans can choose to follow the Democrat lead or get voted out in even bigger numbers two years from now.

All this whining about “where’s the bipartisanship?” is, yes, just whining. The Republicans spent the last twelve years kicking the Democrats in the teeth and chuckling about it. Now that the tables have turned they’re crying like little babies after less than a week. How about waiting to see how much the Democrats actually do abuse their power before damning them, hmmm?  
[/QUOTE]

Quit being a douche.  
If one of the biggest complaints from the left the last few years wasn’t, "the pubbies won’t play nice ☹ ", then I’m Uncle Fester’s reincarnate.

All the OP is saying is, “Now that you guys have the power let’s see if you’ll play by the rules you claim the right **should** have been playing by this whole time.”

Simple really.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Uncommon\_Sense](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/f9ae1b/32.png) [@Uncommon\_Sense](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Uncommon_Sense)\
**Post date:** [January 8, 2007, 1:03am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/remember-that-talk-of-democrats-working-for-unity-heh/387091/23 "2007-01-08T01:03:37Z")

</div>

Sorry, I’m just frustrated that posters will get all up-in-arms over what the other side does, but when it appears that their guys are about to do the same things, it suddenly becomes alright. Of course that’s human nature, but I though most of the posters here were above that.

(BTW, I think the dems should ram it down the pubbies throats and vice versa. They don’t play nice together and it’s the only way to get the majority party’s ideas implemented. So no, I’m not bitter, I just think both sides ought to acknowledge this and quit pussy-footin’ around.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![duffer](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/duffer/32/1026_2.png) [@duffer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/duffer)\
**Post date:** [January 8, 2007, 1:12am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/remember-that-talk-of-democrats-working-for-unity-heh/387091/24 "2007-01-08T01:12:12Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Uncommon Sense]  
Sorry, I’m just frustrated that posters will get all up-in-arms over what the other side does, but when it appears that their guys are about to do the same things, it suddenly becomes alright. Of course that’s human nature, but I though most of the posters here were above that.

(BTW, I think the dems should ram it down the pubbies throats and vice versa. They don’t play nice together and it’s the only way to get the majority party’s ideas implemented. So no, I’m not bitter, I just think both sides ought to acknowledge this and quit pussy-footin’ around.)  
[/QUOTE]

In a sense, this boils down my whole OP. As I’ve stated previously in other threads, politics in the US are more about cheering on your team like in sports, not about what is “good” for the country.

Every argument we’ve seen in the Pit and GD over the past few years are about to be revived. It’s just that the party in question will be Dem instead of GOP, and vice versa.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_Hamster\_King](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/8edcca/32.png) [@The\_Hamster\_King](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Hamster_King)\
**Post date:** [January 8, 2007, 1:20am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/remember-that-talk-of-democrats-working-for-unity-heh/387091/25 "2007-01-08T01:20:35Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Uncommon Sense]  
Quit being a douche.  
If one of the biggest complaints from the left the last few years wasn’t, "the pubbies won’t play nice ☹ ", then I’m Uncle Fester’s reincarnate.

All the OP is saying is, “Now that you guys have the power let’s see if you’ll play by the rules you claim the right **should** have been playing by this whole time.”

Simple really.  
[/QUOTE]  
Did you even read what you quoted? Specifically, “How about waiting to see how much the Democrats actually do abuse their power before damning them, hmmm?”

If, over the next few months, we consistently see the kind of shenanigans that the Republicans were famous for (holding open floor votes, holding secret committee meetings, keeping the contents of bills secret until the eleventh hour, improperly terminating debates) then I will join with you in decrying the bully-boy tactics of the Democrats.

**But merely being partisan is not abusing power.** And pretending that the Democrats are acting in bad faith from the get-go merely because they are aggressively advancing their agenda is disingenuous. The Democrats didn’t get elected because they promised to play nice with the Republicans. The Democrats got elected because they promised to fix what the Republicans had broken.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GIGObuster](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/gigobuster/32/421_2.png) [@GIGObuster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GIGObuster)\
**Post date:** [January 8, 2007, 1:29am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/remember-that-talk-of-democrats-working-for-unity-heh/387091/26 "2007-01-08T01:29:11Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Pochacco]  
Did you even read what you quoted? Specifically, “How about waiting to see how much the Democrats actually do abuse their power before damning them, hmmm?”

If, over the next few months, we consistently see the kind of shenanigans that the Republicans were famous for (holding open floor votes, holding secret committee meetings, keeping the contents of bills secret until the eleventh hour, improperly terminating debates) then I will join with you in decrying the bully-boy tactics of the Democrats.

**But merely being partisan is not abusing power.** And pretending that the Democrats are acting in bad faith from the get-go merely because they are aggressively advancing their agenda is disingenuous. The Democrats didn’t get elected because they promised to play nice with the Republicans. The Democrats got elected because they promised to fix what the Republicans had broken.  
[/QUOTE]

I rarely do this, but this deserves to be repeated, and you all really need to check the cartoon \*\*Bosda Di’Chi of Tricor \*\* linked to.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_Hamster\_King](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/8edcca/32.png) [@The\_Hamster\_King](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Hamster_King)\
**Post date:** [January 8, 2007, 1:30am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/remember-that-talk-of-democrats-working-for-unity-heh/387091/27 "2007-01-08T01:30:12Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=duffer]  
As I’ve stated previously in other threads, politics in the US are more about cheering on your team like in sports, not about what is “good” for the country.  
[/QUOTE]  
You’re wrong. There’s a real difference between the Democrats and the Republicans. If the Democrats had controlled the government over the last 6 years would we be running record deficits? Would we be mired in Iraq? Would the prescription drug plan be such a fuck-up? Would New Orleans have been left to rot?

More Democrats in power and fewer Republicans is good for the country. More Democratic legislation passed and less Republican legislation passed is good for the country. Pretending there isn’t a difference is rubbish.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Uncommon\_Sense](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/f9ae1b/32.png) [@Uncommon\_Sense](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Uncommon_Sense)\
**Post date:** [January 8, 2007, 1:33am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/remember-that-talk-of-democrats-working-for-unity-heh/387091/28 "2007-01-08T01:33:57Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Pochacco]  
Did you even read what you quoted? Specifically, “How about waiting to see how much the Democrats actually do abuse their power before damning them, hmmm?”  
[/quote]  
Yes, thanks, that’s why I followed up with the second post right away - to clarify.

> [@](#):
>
> If, over the next few months, we consistently see the kind of shenanigans that the Republicans were famous for (holding open floor votes, holding secret committee meetings, keeping the contents of bills secret until the eleventh hour, improperly terminating debates) then I will join with you in decrying the bully-boy tactics of the Democrats.

Don’t cut the dems short, they held their ground pretty well. Minority?, sometimes I wonder if being the minority in congress doesn’t come with (greater) benefits.

> [@](#):
>
> **But merely being partisan is not abusing power.** And pretending that the Democrats are acting in bad faith from the get-go merely because they are aggressively advancing their agenda is disingenuous. **The Democrats didn’t get elected because they promised to play nice with the Republicans. The Democrats got elected because they promised to fix what the Republicans had broken.**

Then you say that.  
All that is is a set-up for future rationalisations. From now on you’ll simply say that the dems were right all along and that they should do whatever they possibly can to make things right again, even if that means playing unfairly, or nastily, or whatever the right was accused of.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Uncommon\_Sense](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/f9ae1b/32.png) [@Uncommon\_Sense](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Uncommon_Sense)\
**Post date:** [January 8, 2007, 1:39am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/remember-that-talk-of-democrats-working-for-unity-heh/387091/29 "2007-01-08T01:39:34Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Pochacco]  
You’re wrong. There’s a real difference between the Democrats and the Republicans. If the Democrats had controlled the government over the last 6 years would we be running record deficits?  
[/quote]

Hard to say, but probably not.

> [@](#):
>
> Would we be mired in Iraq?

Eventually, yes.

> [@](#):
>
> Would the prescription drug plan be such a fuck-up?

Probably.

> [@](#):
>
> Would New Orleans have been left to rot?

Name one act the pubbies shot down where the dems had such chance at righting _that_ ship?

> [@](#):
>
> More Democrats in power and fewer Republicans is good for the country. More Democratic legislation passed and less Republican legislation passed is good for the country. Pretending there isn’t a difference is rubbish.

Sure, for now. Then we’ll have to re-distribute the weight back to the port side (God, I wish there was a third choice…) again, otherwise all the Rum will spill into the ocean.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![duffer](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/duffer/32/1026_2.png) [@duffer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/duffer)\
**Post date:** [January 8, 2007, 1:42am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/remember-that-talk-of-democrats-working-for-unity-heh/387091/30 "2007-01-08T01:42:15Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Pochacco]  
The Democrats got elected because they promised to fix what the Republicans had broken.  
[/QUOTE]

Bullshit. The Dems were elected on a promise to work with the “opposition” to work for the good of the “American People.”

Shutting them out may be what they see as payback for slights over the last 12 years. It doesn’t do a lot for the country.

If the Dems want to restore civility, more power to them. But you know damn well that ain’t gonna happen. It’s going to be more of the same, with a different party in power.

If you want to delude yourself, go for it.

Keep in mind, the GOP has had 12 years of studying the Dem’s gameplan while out of power to counter-attack.

Hope you enjoyed the high horse. It isn’t going to get any better. Unfortunately.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bricker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/977dab/32.png) [@Bricker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bricker)\
**Post date:** [January 8, 2007, 1:44am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/remember-that-talk-of-democrats-working-for-unity-heh/387091/31 "2007-01-08T01:44:43Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Pochacco]  
You’re wrong. There’s a real difference between the Democrats and the Republicans. If the Democrats had controlled the government over the last 6 years would we be running record deficits? Would we be mired in Iraq? Would the prescription drug plan be such a fuck-up? Would New Orleans have been left to rot?

More Democrats in power and fewer Republicans is good for the country. More Democratic legislation passed and less Republican legislation passed is good for the country. Pretending there isn’t a difference is rubbish.  
[/QUOTE]

There’s a difference.

I don’t agree at all that the Democrats’ ideas are better. I believe that the Republicans are the better choice for steering the country.

But – at least for the next two years – the Democrats have their chance to steer; the people have spoken. I expect them do what they can to further their agenda… why shouldn’t they?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GIGObuster](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/gigobuster/32/421_2.png) [@GIGObuster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GIGObuster)\
**Post date:** [January 8, 2007, 1:44am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/remember-that-talk-of-democrats-working-for-unity-heh/387091/32 "2007-01-08T01:44:49Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Uncommon Sense]

Don’t cut the dems short, they held their ground pretty well. Minority?, sometimes I wonder if being the minority in congress doesn’t come with (greater) benefits.

[/QUOTE]

Yeah right, the democrat’s hearings on the Downing street memos and other items on the Iraq war sure were noticed or useful with no subpoena powers.

[http://www.commondreams.org/headlines05/0616-01.htm](http://www.commondreams.org/headlines05/0616-01.htm)

> [@](#):
>
> Conyers, the senior Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, will hold his forum without the full authority and resources normally involved in a congressional hearing. The Republican-run Judiciary Committee doesn’t recognize Conyers’ forum as official.
> 
> Initially, Republicans denied Conyers access to a room in the Capitol complex for his forum, but on Wednesday he was granted use of a small room. Because he lacks the committee’s consent, Conyers has no subpoena powers, investigative staff or funds to conduct his inquiry.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GIGObuster](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/gigobuster/32/421_2.png) [@GIGObuster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GIGObuster)\
**Post date:** [January 8, 2007, 1:52am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/remember-that-talk-of-democrats-working-for-unity-heh/387091/33 "2007-01-08T01:52:36Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=duffer]  
Bullshit. The Dems were elected on a promise to work with the “opposition” to work for the good of the “American People.”  
[/quote]

:rolleyes:

I need to tell myself that indeed one has to hate the bullshit not the bullshitter.

> **[Why The Democrats Won](http://www.cbsnews.com/news/why-the-democrats-won/?index=1)**
>
> Bush, Iraq War And Congressional Corruption Badly Hurt The GOP

> [@](#):
>
> Throughout the campaign season, Democrats argued that Republicans in Congress represented a “culture of corruption.” This theme appears to have resonated among voters. Forty-one percent of voters said that corruption and scandals in government were extremely important in their House vote, with an additional 33 percent saying the issues were very important. Those citing corruption and scandals as very important favored Democratic House candidates by 8 points, and those who said they were extremely important favored Democrats by 24 points.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Uncommon\_Sense](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/f9ae1b/32.png) [@Uncommon\_Sense](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Uncommon_Sense)\
**Post date:** [January 8, 2007, 1:53am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/remember-that-talk-of-democrats-working-for-unity-heh/387091/34 "2007-01-08T01:53:50Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Bricker]  
There’s a difference.

I don’t agree at all that the Democrats’ ideas are better. I believe that the Republicans are the better choice for steering the country.

But – at least for the next two years – the Democrats have their chance to steer; the people have spoken. I expect them do what they can to further their agenda… why shouldn’t they?  
[/QUOTE]

Thankyou, exactly.  
Example;  
If a Chief Justice needs to be appointed let the ruling party give 'er. As long as he/she aint a total whack job, that is. Not every damned appointee needs to be a moderate for cripes sake!!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Uncommon\_Sense](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/f9ae1b/32.png) [@Uncommon\_Sense](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Uncommon_Sense)\
**Post date:** [January 8, 2007, 1:56am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/remember-that-talk-of-democrats-working-for-unity-heh/387091/35 "2007-01-08T01:56:42Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=GIGObuster]  
:rolleyes:

I need to tell myself that indeed one has to hate the bullshit not the bullshitter.

> **[Why The Democrats Won](http://www.cbsnews.com/news/why-the-democrats-won/?index=1)**
>
> Bush, Iraq War And Congressional Corruption Badly Hurt The GOP

> [@](#):
>
> Throughout the campaign season, Democrats argued that Republicans in Congress represented a “culture of corruption.” This theme appears to have resonated among voters. Forty-one percent of voters said that corruption and scandals in government were extremely important in their House vote, with an additional 33 percent saying the issues were very important. Those citing corruption and scandals as very important favored Democratic House candidates by 8 points, and those who said they were extremely important favored Democrats by 24 points.

[/QUOTE]

Keep those numbers handy, you might need them again in a few years. Just switch the parties around.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![duffer](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/duffer/32/1026_2.png) [@duffer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/duffer)\
**Post date:** [January 8, 2007, 1:59am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/remember-that-talk-of-democrats-working-for-unity-heh/387091/36 "2007-01-08T01:59:15Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Pochacco]  
You’re wrong. There’s a real difference between the Democrats and the Republicans. If the Democrats had controlled the government over the last 6 years would we be running record deficits? Would we be mired in Iraq? Would the prescription drug plan be such a fuck-up? Would New Orleans have been left to rot?

More Democrats in power and fewer Republicans is good for the country. More Democratic legislation passed and less Republican legislation passed is good for the country. Pretending there isn’t a difference is rubbish.  
[/QUOTE]

Nope. We’d have Viet Nam, double digit inflation, oil crises. 40 years of Democratic Congresses (with occasional Democratic Presidents) to take care of that pesky prescription drug annoyance.

A Democrat in charge of New Orleans responsible for the known hurricane risk, a Democrat governor responsible for state emergencies. You think it’s reasonable to blame someone in Washington for what the local government should have done?

They were elected to manage the local stuff. Washington (Bush could have done better), is not the first line of help. The Federal government is the last line of defense to protect people.

Where was Congress over the last 20 years to help out with dikes and flood mitigation? Where was the President _over the last 20 years_ to help out with known flaws?

Why are the Pols in LA given a pass when they were elected to help protect citizens from such a massive disaster?  
Why is Clinton (you’re blaming the President for a natural disaster) given a pass on the flood of '97 in Grand Forks? The flood that allowed Al Gore to stand in a hanger at the GFAFB preaching Global Warming to displaced residents as the cause of the flood? Nice posturing.

Guess what? Not a single lost life. Know why? Yes, you do. It’s because our local government was prepared for such a rare occurance and mobilized.

Our small town hick government prevented a single death, while the big time leaders of a city that knew a hurricane was likely to destroy much of the city sat on their asses and decided to deflect blame to those they thought should save them from themselves.  
Yep. Democrats have the magic bullet. Good luck with that.  
And when you grow up, maybe you’ll understand that neither party is the cure. It comes down to locality and your leadership.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GIGObuster](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/gigobuster/32/421_2.png) [@GIGObuster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GIGObuster)\
**Post date:** [January 8, 2007, 1:59am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/remember-that-talk-of-democrats-working-for-unity-heh/387091/37 "2007-01-08T01:59:37Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Bricker]  
There’s a difference.

I don’t agree at all that the Democrats’ ideas are better. I believe that the Republicans are the better choice for steering the country.  
[/quote]

And I do believe that on the whole no party in control of all branches of power is a good choice. It is only when they have the power to be on each other’s toes that the country can have the hope to get a responsible government.

The eternal vigilance of the people is needed today more than ever.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GIGObuster](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/gigobuster/32/421_2.png) [@GIGObuster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GIGObuster)\
**Post date:** [January 8, 2007, 2:01am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/remember-that-talk-of-democrats-working-for-unity-heh/387091/38 "2007-01-08T02:01:07Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Uncommon Sense]  
Keep those numbers handy, you might need them again in a few years. Just switch the parties around.  
[/QUOTE]

You are confusing me with someone else.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MMI](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/53a042/32.png) [@MMI](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MMI)\
**Post date:** [January 8, 2007, 2:02am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/remember-that-talk-of-democrats-working-for-unity-heh/387091/39 "2007-01-08T02:02:53Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=duffer]  
This isn’t really a Pitting of the Democrats. I’ve said it before, I’m saying it now, and I’m sure there will be plenty of opportunities to say it in the future. The Party politics are too far entrenched not to. This is more a Pitting of those high-minded among us that were so righteous in their calls of “unfairness” by the GOP over the years in Congress.

[/QUOTE]

So, the Democrats take Congress back after 12 years out of power and after 6 years in which the Republican majority do everything they can to keep the Democrats utterly impotent. Refusing to allow democrats to offer amendments, using loaded conference committees to rewrite legislation as they saw fit, holding votes open until they can strong arm reluctant members of their own party to sign onto the leaderships bills, rewriting congressional documents to mock the democrats.

The new Speaker of the House announces that the Democrats, will, in fact, restore the old school of operating Congress- where even the eeee-vil opposition can participate in government.

But, the democrats _will_ pass their first 100 hours of legislation first.

I guess they are just as bad.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Revtim](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/revtim/32/1042_2.png) [@Revtim](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Revtim)\
**Post date:** [January 8, 2007, 2:03am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/remember-that-talk-of-democrats-working-for-unity-heh/387091/40 "2007-01-08T02:03:13Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Uncommon Sense]

[QUOTE=Pochacco]  
Would we be mired in Iraq?  
[/QUOTE]

Eventually, yes.  
[/QUOTE]  
Why is that?

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/remember-that-talk-of-democrats-working-for-unity-heh/387091.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/remember-that-talk-of-democrats-working-for-unity-heh/387091.md?page=3)
