# Republican Analyst Says 2014 Was Disaster for Republicans, Long Term

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/republican-analyst-says-2014-was-disaster-for-republicans-long-term/705289>\
**Category:** Politics & Elections\
**Created:** [November 21, 2014, 8:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/republican-analyst-says-2014-was-disaster-for-republicans-long-term/705289 "2014-11-21T20:35:59Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![adaher](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/dec6dc/32.png) [@adaher](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/adaher)\
**Post date:** [November 21, 2014, 11:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/republican-analyst-says-2014-was-disaster-for-republicans-long-term/705289/21 "2014-11-21T23:56:38Z")

</div>

Winning is always a bad thing if you will govern poorly. But once again, we have a Democratic writer putting their hopes in demographics to spare the Democrats the need to actually get people to vote for them. Not gonna happen.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fuzzy\_wuzzy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/a8b319/32.png) [@Fuzzy\_wuzzy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Fuzzy_wuzzy)\
**Post date:** [November 22, 2014, 12:04am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/republican-analyst-says-2014-was-disaster-for-republicans-long-term/705289/22 "2014-11-22T00:04:45Z")

</div>

> [@Evil\_Captor](#):
>
> There are a lot of Democrats who despise the Democratic party, and since the advent of the Tea Party, I am SURE there are a lot of Republicans who DESPISE the Republican Party.

And im sure plenty of columnists post absolute tripe in the hope of getting clicks. Look back at talking heads and columnists 20 or 30 years ago. The vast majority of the opinion pieces from that time were bullcrap, they were bullcrap 20 years before _that_, and they are bullcrap now. Its mostly petty posturing or inane speculation. Most of the pieces contain arguments that cannot be proven or disproven. These men and women have columns to fill. The vast majority of political opinion pieces mean absolutely sod all. Occasionally a piece turns out to be prophetic or to have been worth reading. Those are few and far between.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BobLibDem](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/boblibdem/32/3149_2.png) [@BobLibDem](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BobLibDem)\
**Post date:** [November 22, 2014, 12:07am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/republican-analyst-says-2014-was-disaster-for-republicans-long-term/705289/23 "2014-11-22T00:07:58Z")

</div>

> [@adaher](#):
>
> Winning is always a bad thing if you will govern poorly. But once again, we have a Democratic writer putting their hopes in demographics to spare the Democrats the need to actually get people to vote for them. Not gonna happen.

Has anyone heard Republicans put forth one idea of what they will propose in Congress? Here’s what they will do: try to repeal Obamacare. Propose cuts in taxes. But mostly whine and bitch about Obama.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DigitalC](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/ebca7d/32.png) [@DigitalC](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DigitalC)\
**Post date:** [November 22, 2014, 1:00am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/republican-analyst-says-2014-was-disaster-for-republicans-long-term/705289/24 "2014-11-22T01:00:52Z")

</div>

> [@adaher](#):
>
> Winning is always a bad thing if you will govern poorly. But once again, we have a Democratic writer putting their hopes in demographics to spare the Democrats the need to actually get people to vote for them. Not gonna happen.

This is actually true, if Republicans actually put up a good showing while controlling both houses of congress they would have a shot. It’s an extremely naive hope though and absolutely nothing the Republicans have shown at any point in the recent past suggests they are capable of it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![adaher](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/dec6dc/32.png) [@adaher](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/adaher)\
**Post date:** [November 22, 2014, 1:24am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/republican-analyst-says-2014-was-disaster-for-republicans-long-term/705289/25 "2014-11-22T01:24:04Z")

</div>

At the very least, they’ve shown that they have learned from shutting down the government, as well as the last attempt at impeachment. “Do no harm” is the first principle.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![zoo](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/z/71c47a/32.png) [@zoo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/zoo)\
**Post date:** [November 22, 2014, 2:11am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/republican-analyst-says-2014-was-disaster-for-republicans-long-term/705289/26 "2014-11-22T02:11:11Z")

</div>

> [@adaher](#):
>
> At the very least, they’ve shown that they have learned from shutting down the government, as well as the last attempt at impeachment. “Do no harm” is the first principle.

When did the Republicans attempt to impeach Obama?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BobLibDem](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/boblibdem/32/3149_2.png) [@BobLibDem](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BobLibDem)\
**Post date:** [November 22, 2014, 2:24am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/republican-analyst-says-2014-was-disaster-for-republicans-long-term/705289/27 "2014-11-22T02:24:07Z")

</div>

> [@adaher](#):
>
> “Do no harm” is the first principle.

If you don’t like that principle, they have others.

I ask again, have they given any indication of anything they intend to do, other than shit in Obama’s face at every opportunity? Maybe more Benghazi hearings?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Velocity](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/velocity/32/18006_2.png) [@Velocity](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Velocity)\
**Post date:** [November 22, 2014, 2:42am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/republican-analyst-says-2014-was-disaster-for-republicans-long-term/705289/28 "2014-11-22T02:42:53Z")

</div>

> [@zoo](#):
>
> When did the Republicans attempt to impeach Obama?

I think he’s referring to Clinton in the 1990s.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Robot\_Arm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/robot_arm/32/18280_2.png) [@Robot\_Arm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Robot_Arm)\
**Post date:** [November 22, 2014, 2:46am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/republican-analyst-says-2014-was-disaster-for-republicans-long-term/705289/29 "2014-11-22T02:46:16Z")

</div>

> [@adaher](#):
>
> At the very least, they’ve shown that they have learned from shutting down the government, as well as the last attempt at impeachment. “Do no harm” is the first principle.

Don’t fuck things up. You’re setting the bar pretty high there, don’t you think?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![elucidator](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/8edcca/32.png) [@elucidator](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/elucidator)\
**Post date:** [November 22, 2014, 2:51am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/republican-analyst-says-2014-was-disaster-for-republicans-long-term/705289/30 "2014-11-22T02:51:46Z")

</div>

> [@BobLibDem](#):
>
> …Maybe more Benghazi hearings?

Benghazi? Won’t be seeing him around no more. Here, have some cannoli…

Ding, dong Benghazi’s dead. (Which Ghazi? Ben Ghazi!) Ding, dong, Benghazi is dead!

Benghazi, parrot, pining, dead.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![HMS\_Irruncible](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/hms_irruncible/32/7394_2.png) [@HMS\_Irruncible](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/HMS_Irruncible)\
**Post date:** [November 22, 2014, 2:59am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/republican-analyst-says-2014-was-disaster-for-republicans-long-term/705289/31 "2014-11-22T02:59:08Z")

</div>

Politics is nothing but a stochastic walk into the void. Yes, demographics favors the Democrats. No, this is not the beginning of the end for Republicans. Do not underestimate the bias toward power immanent in the system. The Republican party is that mean awful aunt who takes forever to die. And then she’ll die and it’ll be some awful other cousin.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![adaher](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/dec6dc/32.png) [@adaher](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/adaher)\
**Post date:** [November 22, 2014, 4:10am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/republican-analyst-says-2014-was-disaster-for-republicans-long-term/705289/32 "2014-11-22T04:10:44Z")

</div>

> [@Robot\_Arm](#):
>
> Don’t fuck things up. You’re setting the bar pretty high there, don’t you think?

After Obama got many things he wanted from 2009-2010, that’s probably all the voters have demanded of Republicans since. At first, even that was too hard for them, but they seem to be learning.

A conservative party by its very nature doesn’t HAVE to do anything other than the normal work of government, and they’ll probably do that better than Democrats too. Like passing a budget for starters.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Martin\_Hyde](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/47e85d/32.png) [@Martin\_Hyde](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Martin_Hyde)\
**Post date:** [November 22, 2014, 5:14am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/republican-analyst-says-2014-was-disaster-for-republicans-long-term/705289/33 "2014-11-22T05:14:35Z")

</div>

> [@BrainGlutton](#):
>
> Hm . . . He doesn’t seem to be saying anything about **state** governments. The GOP will remain strong – and will be in a prime position to inflate its strength through gerrymandering – so long as it can hold on to as many of those as it has now. The state level is where the DNC really needs to focus its strategizing, IMO.

Republican Congressional strength and Governor election strength has nothing to do with gerrymandering–you’re just repeating a common urban legend.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ITR\_champion](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/c67d28/32.png) [@ITR\_champion](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ITR_champion)\
**Post date:** [November 22, 2014, 5:37am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/republican-analyst-says-2014-was-disaster-for-republicans-long-term/705289/34 "2014-11-22T05:37:27Z")

</div>

> [@Evil\_Captor](#):
>
> The shellacking isn’t what spells their doom. It’s that the same numerical forces that made their success possible spells success for the Democrats at the White House and in the Senate.

Except that, as already noted, these “numerical forces” don’t actually exist. If you think they do, perhaps you could tell us what these forces are and give some serious backing for them.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![zoo](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/z/71c47a/32.png) [@zoo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/zoo)\
**Post date:** [November 22, 2014, 9:50am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/republican-analyst-says-2014-was-disaster-for-republicans-long-term/705289/35 "2014-11-22T09:50:36Z")

</div>

> [@Velocity](#):
>
> I think he’s referring to Clinton in the 1990s.

Not attempt, Clinton was impeached.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ZebraShaSha](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/z/eada6e/32.png) [@ZebraShaSha](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ZebraShaSha)\
**Post date:** [November 22, 2014, 11:36am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/republican-analyst-says-2014-was-disaster-for-republicans-long-term/705289/36 "2014-11-22T11:36:40Z")

</div>

> [@doorhinge](#):
>
> Have you seen the Chicago Democrats gerrymandering of U.S. Congressman Luis Gutiérrez’s Illinois’s 4th District?
> 
> [Illinois 4th District - Google My Maps](https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer?mid=zQ8Zk-5ey-Y8.kpXX_nkp2XMI&msa=0&hl=en&ie=UTF8&t=m&ll=41.878253,-87.777328&spn=0.230063,0.411301&z=11&source=embed)
> 
> They carved into the letter “C”. Probably because they’re such huge Chicago Cubs fans.

Have you seen Texas Republican’s idea of gerrymandering, specifically Austin’s 6 congressional districts, none of which include more than 27% of Austin residents (the largest city in the country without an anchor district)? [One district](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas%27s_15th_congressional_district) stretches to Mexico (some 300 miles away), [one district](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas%27s_10th_congressional_district) stretches to Houston (170ish miles), [one](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas%27s_17th_congressional_district) goes to Waco, etc.

Or what about North Carolina, where in the last election people voted 53% for Democrats but only won 4 of 13 seats?

Or Pennsylvania, where citizens voted 50% for Democrats, but got only 5 out of 18 seats?

The only reason Republicans had any sort of midterm victory is how tight they’ve controlled districting over the last decade, after the rise of the Tea Party nation-wide. If we ever get sensible districting again, Republicans are toast.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![adaher](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/dec6dc/32.png) [@adaher](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/adaher)\
**Post date:** [November 22, 2014, 11:53am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/republican-analyst-says-2014-was-disaster-for-republicans-long-term/705289/37 "2014-11-22T11:53:51Z")

</div>

Nope. It’s Democrats who create 90% Democratic districts so that there will be minorities in Congress. In a 50-50 country, that means they are almost guaranteed to lose. “sensible” districting would involve an end to racial gerrymandering.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![zoo](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/z/71c47a/32.png) [@zoo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/zoo)\
**Post date:** [November 22, 2014, 1:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/republican-analyst-says-2014-was-disaster-for-republicans-long-term/705289/38 "2014-11-22T13:42:15Z")

</div>

> [@adaher](#):
>
> Nope. It’s Democrats who create 90% Democratic districts so that there will be minorities in Congress. In a 50-50 country, that means they are almost guaranteed to lose. “sensible” districting would involve an end to racial gerrymandering.

Now you are wrong again. If Democrats were drawing the districts to their advantage as aggressively as Republicans we would see examples of states with Republican majority votes giving more seats to Democrats. I used the impeachment example above to point out another example of where you were wrong, not to belittle you but to help you to correct your position. The purpose of this board is to fight ignorance. You can do a better job of checking your facts before you post.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [November 22, 2014, 2:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/republican-analyst-says-2014-was-disaster-for-republicans-long-term/705289/39 "2014-11-22T14:26:39Z")

</div>

> [@Martin\_Hyde](#):
>
> Republican Congressional strength and Governor election strength has nothing to do with gerrymandering–you’re just repeating a common urban legend.

True WRT governors, false WRT the HoR.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Martin\_Hyde](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/47e85d/32.png) [@Martin\_Hyde](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Martin_Hyde)\
**Post date:** [November 22, 2014, 2:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/republican-analyst-says-2014-was-disaster-for-republicans-long-term/705289/40 "2014-11-22T14:40:10Z")

</div>

> [@BrainGlutton](#):
>
> True WRT governors, false WRT the HoR.

True WRT both. Even the liberal Washington Post thoroughly debunked this, there’s a small handful of seats that the GOP probably picked up due to Gerrymandering, but not enough to make or break their majority. A lot of Republican states (in States with less than five districts) are very difficult to gerrymander anyway. I wouldn’t doubt Kansas Republicans would love to gerrymander their State but when you’ve only got a few population centers and a few congressional districts you can’t really replicate what they did in states like Ohio. Other Southern States like South Carolina are legally required by the Federal government to gerrymander, to guarantee “majority-minority districts”, but that was ill thought out liberal policy because it guarantees less diverse districts elsewhere that are less competitive. But that cannot be ascribed to Republican gerrymandering when it is mandated by the Federal courts.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/republican-analyst-says-2014-was-disaster-for-republicans-long-term/705289.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/republican-analyst-says-2014-was-disaster-for-republicans-long-term/705289.md?page=3)
