Republican “migrants stunt”

I have a better idea. Universal healthcare. Available to all citizens, as well as certain permanent residents and visa holders. Part of obtaining permanent resident status or receiving a visa would be satisfying the requirements for payment of medical bills, either by private insurance coverage or a reciprocal agreement between the US and applicants government’s UHC system.

You get sick or injured, you get treated. If you are a citizen, your UHC coverage pays the bill. If you’re a resident alien or visa holder, the US is either reimbursed by your home country’s system, or by the private insurance required for receiving resident status or your visa.

Not a legal resident? You get treated, but now you owe the US government for your care. Can’t pay? Well, since you have no insurance and no legal right to be in this country, you get deported (IMHO, it would be cruel to imprison someone for debts incurred due to illness, injury, or accident). When you are deported, you are informed in no uncertain terms that application for entry into the US will be denied until your bill is paid. Illegal entry to avoid payment is a crime against the US Treasury and will result in jail time.

Solve two problems with one act. You want to immigrate here legally? Sure, show that you will be a contributing member of society and that the cost of your healthcare is covered, come on. Want to come here to go to school? Sure, show that you can pay tuition, pass the courses, and that your healthcare is covered and all is good. Want to simply work here for a limited time and return home? Well, you get the idea.

ETA: Typo

I agree it’s not fair to punish the employer for being lied to by the employees - but there are plenty of situations where the employers weren’t lied to. They either didn’t ask or outright prefer to hire the undocumented because it is easier to exploit them - you can’t scare people who are working legally by threatening to call immigration. In some cases, the employer even provides the false information to be used for eVerify

If they didn’t fill out the I-9, then that is already against employment law. The punishments for not having that filled out are harsh enough already. I know employers who have been hit with thousands of dollars of fines, not because their employees were illegal, but because they weren’t diligent with their paperwork. I pay a third party to come in and inspect my I-9’s every 6 months to make sure that I am compliant, and don’t get hit by fines.

Not sure what you are wanting to do there to make it more harsh, without punishing innocent small employers even more than they already are.

And that’s fraud and possibly conspiracy, which is a crime itself as well. I have no problem with prosecuting employers engaged in such.

What I do have a problem with is going after employers who have accepted documents presented in good faith, or leaving employees left with no recourse if they are mistakenly flagged.

(in strong German accent, by a dude in a black leather trench coat) “Your Papers please”. Not to mention if the GOP gets control, they will make the card so hard to get by minorities, no fair election will ever occur again. A terrible, terrible idea.
Personally, I don’t care if “illegals” pick strawberries or clean hotel rooms… no, I do care, I like to see those necessary jobs get done, and Americans can’t or won’t do them. I worked on a migrant farm worker project and those people (likely half of whom were illegals) were super hard working and not “bad hombres”.

Unless the Republicans were running it.

I have an even better idea-Universal healthcare. Available to all humans.

No, national ID cards work only if there is no problem obtaining them. And I’m not saying they’re a good idea, just that they would go a long way toward preventing employing those not legally allowed to work in the country. Or at least not employing them aboveboard.

The migrants stunt was so godawful that even Jared Kushner is speaking out against it. I guess it’s true what they say about broken clocks.

This is an incentive to avoid treatment for communicable diseases.

But I’m not here to jump on you. Every comprehensive immigration policy has big moral and practical problems. Every one.

You can take the position that, in the real world, a politically possible shift in the direction of immigration leniency will always be an improvement. That close to my position. And it’s dependent on there being other people pushing against open borders.

Spoken like someone who doesn’t know what the quota is for the unskilled laborers who do most of the agricultural work. Here’s a hint: Making it “four times higher” wouldn’t make any difference at all.

Which means only under a Democratic Congress and President. Under a GOP one- not so much. So since I do not think you or anyone can guarantee the GOP will never, ever again have such control, the idea is- as I said- A terrible, terrible idea.

A cruel hoax perpetrated on asylum-seekers–the same “reverse Freedom Rides” BS they pulled on black families in the 60s. If they’re so concerned about the undocumented flooding into the country, they should pay attention to the ports, not the borders.

Thank you for pointing that out…I guess the same sort of people are up to the same sort of hijinks…

Or Jared, whose political career is tied to Trump, recognizes that DeSantis has gotten a little to big for his britches and been elevated from Trump supporter to rival.

Yes.

That’s the short answer. For a more complete answer there are various conditions and qualifications before these people can get a work permit, but the vast majority of them will be able to legally work in the US.

In recent years (outside of the the Trump administration during covid) the eventual rejection rate for this category of migrants runs about 60%. Nonetheless, until their cases are decided these people are legally allowed to live and work in the US. The fact that their cases often take many years to decide is on us and our dysfunctional immigration system, not the asylum seekers who are complying with the rules.

Have to remember that Kushner is on Team Trump - discrediting Ron DeSantis benefits his team. It’s not so much that Kushner gives a damn about the migrants as he sees a way to gain political advantage for his father-in-law.

And one of those qualifications is that it has been over 365 days since they have applied for asylum, is it not?

I am on your side here. I think that the rejection rate should be much closer to 0%, and it should take much less time to get that determination.

But, I am discussing the laws as they currently stand, dysfunctional as they are.

Do you mean 4x is too small compared to current rates? Or that if we bumped the visa rate it would increase demand? Or something else?

This site gives the daily breakdown of 2.2k invited, 4k unauthorized and apprehend, and 1k unauthorized and undetected. If I understand these numbers correctly it seems like a 2x increase would be sustainable at current demand.

One huge caveat that these numbers lump all source countries together. I suspect the ratio of demand and visas is much higher for the countries sending a lot of the 5k unauthorized. I think this is why you suggested 4x is not high enough.

This is an area I don’t know much about and am curious what a sustainable immigration rate would be. IIRC @PhillyGuy’s 4x assumed a path to authorized status for the existing +10M unauthorized workers.

I’m not sure that is the bandwagon anyone wants to be hopping on right now…

I mean that, under the current rules, there is no legal path to immigration for an unskilled worker (aside from “sneak in and hope for an amnesty”). These people aren’t “not waiting their turn”; they don’t have a turn to wait. Four times zero is still zero.

Incorrect. According to my most recent look-up/information they can apply for a work authorization when their case has been in the system for 150 days and can receive one at 180 days into their wait, or at about six months into their stay in the US.

Assuming, of course, there aren’t bureaucratic delays for that.

Not sure how they’re supposed to survive until that point, but in practice I assume it’s charity or under the table work or both.

In Kushner’s case it’s the family brand/business he’s supporting as well as a political candidate.

Yes.

The current system only wants highly skilled, highly educated immigrants.

Most of the people who want in are not that. Also, it seems we are heading towards a shortage of people for jobs that don’t require higher education or elite skills, as well as a shrinking youth demographic. Both of those latter problems could be mitigated by allowing younger and less educated people to enter. I can’t help but think that the rejection of this option is connected to the fact that a lot of the people matching that description also happen to have darker skin and/or non-Christian religions which for some stupid reason scares some people.