Republicans don't give a CHIP about children's health care

I’m ignoring all of it. No religious considerations for social policy.

So?

Because your ilk use them as weapons. You cherry-pick guidance when it suits you and screech like frightened geese when faith is used to advance a policy you don’t like.

But that’s not the principal reason. The principal reason is: because those teachings are not intended to be applied piecemeal. People wring their hands at the Church’s rejection of birth control, not understanding that the Church also teaches that sex is reserved to a marital act and in that context alone does the rule exist.

Not really. It’s perfectly possible to imagine a secular, atheistic affirmation of the need to protect human life in the womb, and more so not even necessary to imagine it: there are pro-life atheists.

No. It’s policy you don’t want, so it’s swept away as theocratic, your supposed interest in religiously based social policy a mere wisp of a memory now that we pick something you disfavor. Keep your theology off my biology!