# Resolved:  Christmas should be rescinded as a national holiday in the U.S.

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/resolved-christmas-should-be-rescinded-as-a-national-holiday-in-the-u-s/333553>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [December 1, 2005, 2:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/resolved-christmas-should-be-rescinded-as-a-national-holiday-in-the-u-s/333553 "2005-12-01T14:31:38Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 6

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/left_hand_of_dorkness/32/7156_2.png) [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Left_Hand_of_Dorkness)\
**Post date:** [December 2, 2005, 2:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/resolved-christmas-should-be-rescinded-as-a-national-holiday-in-the-u-s/333553/101 "2005-12-02T14:41:09Z")

</div>

> [@Debaser](#):
>
> If the stereotypes are absurd and unwelcome then why don’t you attack those on the secular left who exhibit them! All I’m doing is pointing out the absurdity of these beliefs. Blaming me for pointing out the absurdity of secular leftist beliefs is like blaming the weatherman for the storm.
> 
> Now you’re calling the ideas of the secular left rididulous. Does this make you as rude as I? :rolleyes:

No, it doesn’t, because rudeness lies not in the facts, but in the attitude. "I’m not being rude–I’m just speaking the TROOOOOOTH!!!11!1"is the first refuge of the boorish.

I made the argument without contemptuous and contemptible  
stereotyping. You didn’t; and therein lies the difference.

Daniel

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![wonky](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/wonky/32/393_2.png) [@wonky](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/wonky)\
**Post date:** [December 2, 2005, 2:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/resolved-christmas-should-be-rescinded-as-a-national-holiday-in-the-u-s/333553/102 "2005-12-02T14:50:44Z")

</div>

> [@Left Hand of Dorkness](#):
>
> While I understand the word’s etymoogy, its etymology and its current meaning are two separate things. Let me ask a couple questions:
> 
> 1. On what day do most Americans celebrate Christmas?
> 2. What do most Americans call the holiday celebrated on December 25?
> 
> The answer to these two questions ought to determine what term the government uses in its official documents to refer to the holiday it provides its workers on December 25.

1. On what day do most Americans celebrate Independence Day?
2. What do most Americans call the holiday celebrated on July 4th?

If the government has to use the common term, they should have a “4th of July” holiday. Instead, it’s “Independence Day.”

There’s no reason the common term and the official term have to be the same word or words.

Words can invoke change. The Christians overlaid their holidays on older festivals and renamed them. To the victor belongs the spoils, and I think it’s clear that secular Christmas has overtaken religious Christmas. Hell, that’s what the religious Christians get so pissed off about.

There’s nothing imprecise about having two terms for something, one of which the religious folk use, the other that the government uses, and the rest of us get to pick which one we like better. Having two terms for two similar things is better than having one term for two dissimilar things, if your interest really is communication.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SentientMeat](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/43a26b/32.png) [@SentientMeat](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SentientMeat)\
**Post date:** [December 2, 2005, 2:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/resolved-christmas-should-be-rescinded-as-a-national-holiday-in-the-u-s/333553/103 "2005-12-02T14:55:40Z")

</div>

In the midst of much apparent rudeness and ridicule, I wish everyone here a Merry Xmas.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Scott\_Plaid](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/258eb7/32.png) [@Scott\_Plaid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Scott_Plaid)\
**Post date:** [December 2, 2005, 2:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/resolved-christmas-should-be-rescinded-as-a-national-holiday-in-the-u-s/333553/104 "2005-12-02T14:57:14Z")

</div>

Bah Humbug!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/left_hand_of_dorkness/32/7156_2.png) [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Left_Hand_of_Dorkness)\
**Post date:** [December 2, 2005, 3:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/resolved-christmas-should-be-rescinded-as-a-national-holiday-in-the-u-s/333553/105 "2005-12-02T15:00:36Z")

</div>

> [@jsgoddess](#):
>
> 1. On what day do most Americans celebrate Independence Day?
> 2. What do most Americans call the holiday celebrated on July 4th?
> 
> If the government has to use the common term, they should have a “4th of July” holiday. Instead, it’s “Independence Day.”

First off, I’m guessing that you’ll find nowhere near the consensus on what to call July 4 as you’ll find on what to call December 25. Second, July 4 is a holiday invented by the government (or vice versa); their decision on what to call it has an official quality that is disanalogous from what the government chooses to call December 25. Third, if the government decided to call it The Fourth of July, I wouldn’t have a problem with that.

> [@](#):
>
> There’s nothing imprecise about having two terms for something, one of which the religious folk use, the other that the government uses, and the rest of us get to pick which one we like better. Having two terms for two similar things is better than having one term for two dissimilar things, if your interest really is communication.

There’s nothing imprecise about it, but there is something obfuscatory about it. And nobody has demonstrated any harm whatsoever behind the government’s referring to the holiday the way that it’s **universally** referred to by the government’s constituents.

Daniel

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Debaser](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/3da27b/32.png) [@Debaser](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Debaser)\
**Post date:** [December 2, 2005, 3:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/resolved-christmas-should-be-rescinded-as-a-national-holiday-in-the-u-s/333553/106 "2005-12-02T15:19:17Z")

</div>

> [@Left Hand of Dorkness](#):
>
> No, it doesn’t, because rudeness lies not in the facts, but in the attitude. "I’m not being rude–I’m just speaking the TROOOOOOTH!!!11!1"is the first refuge of the boorish.

:shrug:

You’re entitled to your opinion. I disagree, of course. 😉

I said the secular left was “wacko” you called their position “ridiculous”. Tomato, Tomaato.

> [@](#):
>
> I made the argument without contemptuous and contemptible  
> stereotyping. You didn’t; and therein lies the difference.

Aren’t I allowed to poke fun at stereotypes as long as your a member of the group? (Ex: A Polish guy can make polish jokes without being a racist.) I am a secular person. That’s why it irks me even more that some secular people can be such wackos.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Debaser](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/3da27b/32.png) [@Debaser](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Debaser)\
**Post date:** [December 2, 2005, 3:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/resolved-christmas-should-be-rescinded-as-a-national-holiday-in-the-u-s/333553/107 "2005-12-02T15:21:19Z")

</div>

Holy pronoun confusion, Batman. “Aren’t I allowed to poke fun at stereotypes as long as **I’m** a member of the group?”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![wonky](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/wonky/32/393_2.png) [@wonky](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/wonky)\
**Post date:** [December 2, 2005, 3:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/resolved-christmas-should-be-rescinded-as-a-national-holiday-in-the-u-s/333553/108 "2005-12-02T15:37:39Z")

</div>

> [@Left Hand of Dorkness](#):
>
> And nobody has demonstrated any harm whatsoever behind the government’s referring to the holiday the way that it’s **universally** referred to by the government’s constituents.

I don’t think I need to demonstrate harm to say that in an ideal world the US government wouldn’t have a holiday called “Christmas.” You will recall, I hope, that no one in this thread has said that he wants to see it changed. A couple of us have said that yeah, it’s not a neutral term and yeah, a different name might be nice. So it doesn’t make sense to say that we haven’t demonstrated harm or thought of the practicalities when none of us are suggesting this happen.

It’s definitely a Caesar’s wife sort of situation.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/e99b99/32.png) [@Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Diogenes_the_Cynic)\
**Post date:** [December 2, 2005, 4:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/resolved-christmas-should-be-rescinded-as-a-national-holiday-in-the-u-s/333553/109 "2005-12-02T16:04:14Z")

</div>

> [@Debaser](#):
>
> I think it is fair to characterize the ACLU as an anti-religous lobbying group. They are a lobbying group. Their interpretation of the 1st ammendment can be called “anti-religious”. You might disagree with this sentiment, but it’s hardly a stretch for somebody to make such a claim.

Yes it is. It’s a ridiculous stretch. The ACLU fights FOR religious rights, not against them. I defy you to show a single cite for the ACLU ever once lobbying to deprive a single person of his right to free practice of religion. I can show you cites where they have fought to protect the rights of Christian students in public schools. You can’t show me any where they tried to deprive any Christians of their rights.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shodan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/9f8e36/32.png) [@Shodan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shodan)\
**Post date:** [December 2, 2005, 4:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/resolved-christmas-should-be-rescinded-as-a-national-holiday-in-the-u-s/333553/110 "2005-12-02T16:52:06Z")

</div>

> [@Diogenes the Cynic](#):
>
> Yes it is. It’s a ridiculous stretch. The ACLU fights FOR religious rights, not against them. I defy you to show a single cite for the ACLU ever once lobbying to deprive a single person of his right to free practice of religion.

[You make it too easy.](http://www.aclu.org/safefree/general/17658leg20021030.html)

Regards,  
Shodan

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Scott\_Plaid](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/258eb7/32.png) [@Scott\_Plaid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Scott_Plaid)\
**Post date:** [December 2, 2005, 4:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/resolved-christmas-should-be-rescinded-as-a-national-holiday-in-the-u-s/333553/111 "2005-12-02T16:57:16Z")

</div>

So, the whole “Your Right to swing fist your ends when it reaches my nose” fact goes away when you want it to, I suppose.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shodan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/9f8e36/32.png) [@Shodan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shodan)\
**Post date:** [December 2, 2005, 5:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/resolved-christmas-should-be-rescinded-as-a-national-holiday-in-the-u-s/333553/112 "2005-12-02T17:07:12Z")

</div>

> [@jsgoddess](#):
>
> I don’t think I need to demonstrate harm to say that in an ideal world the US government wouldn’t have a holiday called “Christmas.”

Actually, yes you do.

Unless you want to establish the principle of “you aren’t hurting anyone, but I don’t like it, so stop” as valid. In which case, gay marriage is done for.

Regards,  
Shodan

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/e99b99/32.png) [@Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Diogenes_the_Cynic)\
**Post date:** [December 2, 2005, 5:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/resolved-christmas-should-be-rescinded-as-a-national-holiday-in-the-u-s/333553/113 "2005-12-02T17:10:41Z")

</div>

> [@Shodan](#):
>
> [You make it too easy.](http://www.aclu.org/safefree/general/17658leg20021030.html)
> 
> Regards,  
> Shodan

What does this link have to do with my question? I asked for a cite for the ACLU trying to abridge anyone’s religious freedoms. You linked to an ACLU list of John Ashcroft’s civil liberties abuses. How does that constutute a response to my question? Are you actually trying to suggest that Mr. Ashcrofts religious liberties have somehow been assaulted by the ACLU? Please specify exactly what religious right you think the ACLU is attacking on this page. As it stands, I’m baffled by your link. It seems to be a complete _non-sequitur_. Did you accidentally link the wrong page or something?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/e99b99/32.png) [@Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Diogenes_the_Cynic)\
**Post date:** [December 2, 2005, 5:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/resolved-christmas-should-be-rescinded-as-a-national-holiday-in-the-u-s/333553/114 "2005-12-02T17:12:45Z")

</div>

> [@Shodan](#):
>
> Actually, yes you do.
> 
> Unless you want to establish the principle of “you aren’t hurting anyone, but I don’t like it, so stop” as valid. In which case, gay marriage is done for.
> 
> Regards,  
> Shodan

The establishment Clause doesn’t say it’s ok to endorse a religious view “if you aren’t hurting anyone.” The government doesn’t have a right to endorse Christianity. Period.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/left_hand_of_dorkness/32/7156_2.png) [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Left_Hand_of_Dorkness)\
**Post date:** [December 2, 2005, 5:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/resolved-christmas-should-be-rescinded-as-a-national-holiday-in-the-u-s/333553/115 "2005-12-02T17:22:59Z")

</div>

> [@jsgoddess](#):
>
> I don’t think I need to demonstrate harm to say that in an ideal world the US government wouldn’t have a holiday called “Christmas.”

But they don’t. They’ve got employees who celebrate a holiday on December 25, and those employees call their holiday Christmas, so the government calls the holiday by the name that it’s known by.

If my name is Jesus Almodovar and I get a job for the government, should the government change my name to James–er, Josh–er, Jay? Of course not: the fact that the government refers to me by a name with a Christian etymology does not constitute government endorsement of Christianity. Changing my name in government documents would be obfuscatory and unhelpful. Similarly, they’re calling a holiday by a name with a Christian etymology because that’s its name. Coming up with a new name for it would be obfuscatory and unhelpful.

Daniel

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![wonky](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/wonky/32/393_2.png) [@wonky](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/wonky)\
**Post date:** [December 2, 2005, 6:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/resolved-christmas-should-be-rescinded-as-a-national-holiday-in-the-u-s/333553/116 "2005-12-02T18:03:11Z")

</div>

> [@Shodan](#):
>
> Actually, yes you do.
> 
> Unless you want to establish the principle of “you aren’t hurting anyone, but I don’t like it, so stop” as valid. In which case, gay marriage is done for.

Did you even read the thread? How many times do I have to repeat that I am not, and have not, suggested that it be stopped? In an ideal world, you would get your head out of your ass. That doesn’t mean that you’re hurting anyone, except maybe yourself, by having your head in your ass.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![wonky](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/wonky/32/393_2.png) [@wonky](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/wonky)\
**Post date:** [December 2, 2005, 6:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/resolved-christmas-should-be-rescinded-as-a-national-holiday-in-the-u-s/333553/117 "2005-12-02T18:08:48Z")

</div>

> [@Left Hand of Dorkness](#):
>
> But they don’t. They’ve got employees who celebrate a holiday on December 25, and those employees call their holiday Christmas, so the government calls the holiday by the name that it’s known by.

You’ve lost me. How is that not the government having a holiday called “Christmas”?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/left_hand_of_dorkness/32/7156_2.png) [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Left_Hand_of_Dorkness)\
**Post date:** [December 2, 2005, 6:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/resolved-christmas-should-be-rescinded-as-a-national-holiday-in-the-u-s/333553/118 "2005-12-02T18:38:13Z")

</div>

> [@jsgoddess](#):
>
> You’ve lost me. How is that not the government having a holiday called “Christmas”?

In the sense that the government has an employee named Jesus, they’ve got a holiday named Christmas. But the government is no more responsible for the holiday’s name than for the employee’s name, and it would be equally silly for them to create a new name for either the holiday or them employee.

Daniel

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Psycho\_Pirate](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/9e8a1a/32.png) [@Psycho\_Pirate](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Psycho_Pirate)\
**Post date:** [December 2, 2005, 6:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/resolved-christmas-should-be-rescinded-as-a-national-holiday-in-the-u-s/333553/119 "2005-12-02T18:55:58Z")

</div>

> [@Diogenes the Cynic](#):
>
> What does this link have to do with my question? I asked for a cite for the ACLU trying to abridge anyone’s religious freedoms. You linked to an ACLU list of John Ashcroft’s civil liberties abuses. How does that constutute a response to my question? Are you actually trying to suggest that Mr. Ashcrofts religious liberties have somehow been assaulted by the ACLU? Please specify exactly what religious right you think the ACLU is attacking on this page. As it stands, I’m baffled by your link. It seems to be a complete _non-sequitur_. Did you accidentally link the wrong page or something?

Well, I’m not **Shodan** , but perhaps he is referring to the 3rd bullet in “Other Concerns”

> [@](#):
>
> Has blurred the line between church and state by conducting daily sessions of prayer and Bible study at the DOJ. (According to a recent report in the New Yorker, these sessions have not been occurring since September 11.)

I personally fail to see how a person having voluntary sessions of prayer and Bible study blurs the line between separation of church and state. Granted, this doesn’t really fit your definition of the ACLU abridging Ashcroft’s right to carry out these activities, but the fact that they find such mundane activities as a “concern” is a little troubling to me.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![wonky](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/wonky/32/393_2.png) [@wonky](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/wonky)\
**Post date:** [December 2, 2005, 7:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/resolved-christmas-should-be-rescinded-as-a-national-holiday-in-the-u-s/333553/120 "2005-12-02T19:00:35Z")

</div>

> [@Left Hand of Dorkness](#):
>
> In the sense that the government has an employee named Jesus, they’ve got a holiday named Christmas. But the government is no more responsible for the holiday’s name than for the employee’s name, and it would be equally silly for them to create a new name for either the holiday or them employee.

That’s a good point. But my argument would be that the government’s “Christmas” isn’t the same thing as Jerry Falwell’s “Christmas.” At least it shouldn’t be. The government’s Christmas includes a day off and trees stuck on windows (that’s how the local SSA office decorates, with window clings). Jerry Falwell’s Christmas includes nativity scenes and religious ceremonies.

If government employees want to put a big nativity scene in city hall, should that be okay? After all, that wouldn’t be the government making a choice or picking the decorations, just allowing an extant holiday to be expressed in a pre-existing way. Or if it’s not universal, does that make it not okay?

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/resolved-christmas-should-be-rescinded-as-a-national-holiday-in-the-u-s/333553.md?page=5)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/resolved-christmas-should-be-rescinded-as-a-national-holiday-in-the-u-s/333553.md?page=7)
