# Resolved: Hijacking threads should never be used as a reason for banning

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/resolved-hijacking-threads-should-never-be-used-as-a-reason-for-banning/975321>\
**Category:** About This Message Board\
**Created:** [November 21, 2022, 3:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/resolved-hijacking-threads-should-never-be-used-as-a-reason-for-banning/975321 "2022-11-21T15:06:03Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 11

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![What\_Exit](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/what_exit/32/10652_2.png) [@What\_Exit](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/What_Exit)\
**Post date:** [November 21, 2022, 4:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/resolved-hijacking-threads-should-never-be-used-as-a-reason-for-banning/975321/11 "2022-11-21T16:17:34Z")

</div>

So as your first thread wasn’t enough you started a second? 😕

> [@Why is a reversed suspension being used as a reason for a permanent banning?](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/why-is-a-reversed-suspension-being-used-as-a-reason-for-a-permanent-banning/974510):
>
> UltraVires has been permanently banned. The first reason for the ban is that he was suspended for a comment made about outdoor mask-wearing during Dick Clarke’s Rocking New Year’s Eve. That suspension was reversed. I disagree with the banning because it removes from the SDMB a poster with an interesting perspective. Sometimes interesting people can be controversial. I’m happy to expand my viewpoint further, and debate the other warnings, which I think should be insufficient for a banning.…

An occasional hijacking alone will not be a reason to ban, but combined with other behaviors or a pattern of trolling via hijacks it will remain a reason to ban. Hijacking alone was not the reason UV was banned.

---

_[View the full topic](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/resolved-hijacking-threads-should-never-be-used-as-a-reason-for-banning/975321)._
