You’re the expert. Certainly my observation that a small number of people are really upset about this and the rest are just grumbling doesn’t carry any value.
Yes, given I was responding to a terrorist funded scenario I am projecting that people would object. It’s a crazy world out there but a Mohammed Atta Food Court isn’t going to be as popular as you think.
You were supposed to find the very idea of a Mohammed Atta Food Court too ludicrous to take it seriously. Which part of culinary school, basketball court, day care, and meditation rooms makes you suspect the sinister hand of Al Qaeda?
A terrorist funded scenario that you invented in your own mind and then assumed everyone in New York agreed with? Yeah that is the projecting that I was referring to.
You’d better get that third party away from your computer.
One has not been found despite months of crying from the likes of WND and the Washington Times. I see no reason to waste money or effort trying to look for something that professional haters with all the resources of the press have not found.
For one thing, it is contrary to all history regarding Wahabbism, al Qaida, and related groups. They have never tried to go “stealth” with an idea, always broadcasting their hatred openly and publishing their intentions. To promote the sort of idea that gets upset at the Cordoba Initiative, one would have to postulate that the Islamists would be willing to fund an organization that has been openly rejecting their brand of Islam for more than ten years prior to the WTC/Pentagon attacks, just so they could put up a community center in Manhattan.
That is a variety of paranoia in which I am unwilling to expend any effort.