# Return To Office, not working as controlling bosses wanted it

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/return-to-office-not-working-as-controlling-bosses-wanted-it/1020858>\
**Category:** In My Humble Opinion\
**Created:** [July 14, 2025, 10:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/return-to-office-not-working-as-controlling-bosses-wanted-it/1020858 "2025-07-14T22:06:47Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GIGObuster](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/gigobuster/32/421_2.png) [@GIGObuster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GIGObuster)\
**Post date:** [July 14, 2025, 10:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/return-to-office-not-working-as-controlling-bosses-wanted-it/1020858/1 "2025-07-14T22:06:47Z")

</div>

> **[The data is in: RTO policies don't improve employee performance or company...](https://www.businessinsider.com/rto-policies-dont-improve-employee-performance-company-value-controlling-bosses-2024-1)**
>
> Researchers studying RTO policies of S&P 500 companies found no improvement in the value of the businesses that brought workers back to the office.

> Late last year, [Forbes](https://www.forbes.com/sites/shephyken/2023/09/24/nine-out-of-10-companies-will-require-employees-to-return-to-the-office/?sh=12052a8c2baf) reported that 90% of companies will return to the office in 2024, with 28% threatening to fire workers who don’t comply.
> 
> But it turns out that the motivations for calling workers back to the office may have less to do with employee productivity or profit margins and everything to do with catering to the egos of controlling managers who want their workers back, according to a [recent study](https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4675401) published by researchers at the University of Pittsburgh.

**That report was from 2024**. How it is going now in the days many big companies thought that the winds had changed in favor of the narcissistic bosses that believed RTO was the panacea for their problems?

Not so good.

[https://www.inc.com/jessica-stillman/new-data-shows-workers-are-mostly-ignoring-return-to-office-orders/91202144](https://www.inc.com/jessica-stillman/new-data-shows-workers-are-mostly-ignoring-return-to-office-orders/91202144)

> Since the pandemic, Reddit and other forums have been full of outraged employees calling their bosses [various profane and unpleasant things](https://www.inc.com/jessica-stillman/remote-work-commute-office-culture.html) for suggesting they give up their remote setups.
> 
> But these are different times. Many companies are [pursuing increased efficiency](https://www.businessinsider.com/tech-industry-amazon-microsoft-meta-google-companies-intensity-hardcore-2025-3), including through large-scale [layoffs](https://www.inc.com/jessica-stillman/considering-layoffs-read-this-stanford-professors-explanation-of-why-layoffs-are-almost-always-a-bad-idea.html). Like Dimon, bosses seem [all too happy to let go](https://fortune.com/2024/07/24/return-to-office-mandates-layoffs-bamboohr-survey/) of any employee who might defy their RTO orders.
> 
> Which might make you think that employees are finally, begrudgingly heeding the back-to-the-office call. Not so, according to Nick Bloom, the Stanford economist behind the 2022 study and a long-time leader in research into hybrid and remote work.
> 
> ## Employees are still ignoring RTO orders
> 
> In 2023, Bloom shared real estate and transit data suggesting that most businesses were settling at three days in the office and two at home. “The return-to-office push seems to have died,” [he tweeted](https://x.com/I_Am_NickBloom/status/1676516768175599617?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1676516768175599617%7Ctwgr%5Ec230b2b7b7b6de61acfe9de793386801a47489d0%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.inc.com%2Fdraft%2F1689064718.html). “The RTO wars were over. [Hybrid won](https://www.inc.com/jessica-stillman/stanford-remote-work-expert-return-to-office-wars-are-over-hybrid-work-won.html).”
> 
> The rhetoric from bosses may have heated up since then, but according to Bloom’s latest data, the numbers haven’t really budged.
> 
> “While policy requirements for office attendance have jumped 10% since early 2024, actual attendance has barely moved, increasing less than 2% during the same time period,” [reports _Time_](https://time.com/charter/7289256/the-return-to-office-reality-gap/#:~:text=The%20most%20revealing%20finding%3F,Nick%20Bloom%20and%20his%20team).

I lost my State job recently thanks in large part to the Federal funding cuts, and one thing I noticed is that the job boards I check online have hundreds of people applying for remote jobs, sometimes hundreds of applications are already in just after a few hours after a remote job is posted, local jobs that I’m applying too are not so popular.

What the data is reporting:

> **[Bosses say RTO, workers say no | LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/news/story/bosses-say-rto-workers-say-no-6953241/)**
>
> Some of the world's biggest companies are warning workers to comply with recent RTO orders, but survey data show that office attendance has increased just 2% since 2024.

> Geographic Arbitrage Factor:  
> Remote-first companies access top talent from lower-cost markets while maintaining competitive salaries. RTO companies pay premium local wages for smaller talent pools.
> 
> The Numbers:  
> Remote workers report higher satisfaction  
> Location flexibility fills positions 40% faster  
> Geographic diversity improves problem-solving
> 
> Strategic Implications:  
> In markets where 25% fewer entry-level positions exist and college graduates face record unemployment, restricting talent pools through location requirements compounds hiring challenges.
> 
> Winning Strategy: Focus on results, not presence. Companies thriving evolved management practices instead of reverting to pre-2020 models.

What do you guys think? It looks as if the RTO is still there, but not working as expected, and IMHO it is looking as a mistake for large corporations that are leaving a lot of talent out.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Saint\_Cad](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/saint_cad/32/18907_2.png) [@Saint\_Cad](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Saint_Cad)\
**Post date:** [July 14, 2025, 10:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/return-to-office-not-working-as-controlling-bosses-wanted-it/1020858/2 "2025-07-14T22:11:59Z")

</div>

I think for many companies RTO was a way to get employees to quit in a way it’s not the companies fault and that way, they don’t have to pay severence or unemployment.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GIGObuster](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/gigobuster/32/421_2.png) [@GIGObuster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GIGObuster)\
**Post date:** [July 14, 2025, 10:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/return-to-office-not-working-as-controlling-bosses-wanted-it/1020858/3 "2025-07-14T22:15:11Z")

</div>

I also did think that, maybe the bosses wanted that result like Elon got with Xitter, but as Time reported in a link in the quotes:

> The most revealing finding? While policy requirements for office attendance have jumped 10% since early 2024, actual attendance has barely moved, increasing less than 2% during the same period based on [data collected by Stanford Professor Nick Bloom and his team](https://wfhresearch.com/data/). This growing compliance gap signals something fundamental: employees are quietly rejecting mandates they find disconnected from both their needs and their demonstrated productivity.

That, or many bosses are quietly chickening out..

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dewey\_Finn](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dewey_finn/32/4222_2.png) [@Dewey\_Finn](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dewey_Finn)\
**Post date:** [July 14, 2025, 10:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/return-to-office-not-working-as-controlling-bosses-wanted-it/1020858/4 "2025-07-14T22:27:01Z")

</div>

I think some employers re-thought RTO policies once they realized that they didn’t have sufficient office space for everyone. Remember that one advantage of WFH is the need for less office space at the expense of using people’s homes instead.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Skywatcher](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/skywatcher/32/254_2.png) [@Skywatcher](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Skywatcher)\
**Post date:** [July 14, 2025, 10:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/return-to-office-not-working-as-controlling-bosses-wanted-it/1020858/5 "2025-07-14T22:28:36Z")

</div>

I work under the Department of Commerce umbrella and there simply isn’t anywhere to put all of our remote workers, at least not yet. The lease for a satellite building was allowed to expire due to not enough in-person workers to justify keeping it open; I don’t know if any buildings in our headquarters complex also closed for the same reason.

Not only are circumstances created by previous administrations blocking – or at least significantly delaying – RTO, our union has taken an active interest in not disrupting anyone’s lives.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Procrustus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/procrustus/32/2994_2.png) [@Procrustus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Procrustus)\
**Post date:** [July 14, 2025, 10:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/return-to-office-not-working-as-controlling-bosses-wanted-it/1020858/6 "2025-07-14T22:30:39Z")

</div>

> [@Dewey\_Finn](#):
>
> Remember that one advantage of WFH is the need for less office space at the expense of using people’s homes instead.

As an employer I can confirm this. We don’t require anyone to come in to the office (except reception) and our overhead has dropped noticably. Not only do we need less space, but we are getting slightly less per foot rate due to overall vacancies. Employees are happy, we’re happy. Some environmental advantages as well.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dewey\_Finn](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dewey_finn/32/4222_2.png) [@Dewey\_Finn](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dewey_Finn)\
**Post date:** [July 14, 2025, 10:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/return-to-office-not-working-as-controlling-bosses-wanted-it/1020858/7 "2025-07-14T22:35:33Z")

</div>

And some employees moved far away from their workplaces, even to different states. So RTO isn’t really possible for some.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![snowthx](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/snowthx/32/10660_2.png) [@snowthx](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/snowthx)\
**Post date:** [July 14, 2025, 10:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/return-to-office-not-working-as-controlling-bosses-wanted-it/1020858/8 "2025-07-14T22:35:48Z")

</div>

In some cases, the RTO motivation is not from the office itself, but from the area the office is located - downtown wants it workers back…

> **[How California state workers' delayed return to office will impact struggling...](https://www.cbsnews.com/sacramento/news/how-california-rto-delay-impact-sacramento-businesses/)**
>
> Many Downtown Sacramento business owners are surprised after the governor's mandate for state workers to return to the office four days a week starting on July 1 is now on pause.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Procrustus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/procrustus/32/2994_2.png) [@Procrustus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Procrustus)\
**Post date:** [July 14, 2025, 10:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/return-to-office-not-working-as-controlling-bosses-wanted-it/1020858/9 "2025-07-14T22:40:14Z")

</div>

> [@Dewey\_Finn](#):
>
> And some employees moved far away from their workplaces, even to different states

We have two employees who moved out of the country. Those are the only two that really aren’t working out, unfortunately.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [July 14, 2025, 11:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/return-to-office-not-working-as-controlling-bosses-wanted-it/1020858/10 "2025-07-14T23:02:52Z")

</div>

> [@GIGObuster](#):
>
> > [@](#):
> >
> > Strategic Implications:  
> > In markets where 25% fewer entry-level positions exist and college graduates face record unemployment, restricting talent pools through location requirements compounds hiring challenges.

This looks to me like the author got it backwards. College graduates facing record unemployment means that the market currently favors the employers, not the employees, so companies are free to restrict talent pools if they like.

Requiring RTO is probably still a bad idea. But the market conditions make it less bad, not more.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dewey\_Finn](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dewey_finn/32/4222_2.png) [@Dewey\_Finn](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dewey_Finn)\
**Post date:** [July 14, 2025, 11:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/return-to-office-not-working-as-controlling-bosses-wanted-it/1020858/11 "2025-07-14T23:06:09Z")

</div>

I’m a little surprised that was allowed. Someone asked in an all hands meeting at my employer and they said that we’re not set up for employing people outside the country.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GIGObuster](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/gigobuster/32/421_2.png) [@GIGObuster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GIGObuster)\
**Post date:** [July 14, 2025, 11:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/return-to-office-not-working-as-controlling-bosses-wanted-it/1020858/12 "2025-07-14T23:06:12Z")

</div>

Yeah, but if that last line was so, then one should see more than the less than 2% growth of RTO.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Odesio](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/odesio/32/20003_2.png) [@Odesio](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Odesio)\
**Post date:** [July 14, 2025, 11:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/return-to-office-not-working-as-controlling-bosses-wanted-it/1020858/13 "2025-07-14T23:08:00Z")

</div>

> [@GIGObuster](#):
>
> What do you guys think? It looks as if the RTO is still there, but not working as expected, and IMHO it is looking as a mistake for large corporations that are leaving a lot of talent out.

Last time we had an RTO was in 2023, and management had to walk that back because we were losing employees at an alarming rate. Later this summer, I’ll need to start coming into the office three times a week. Many employees at my company are super salty about it, and we’re going to lose people, but I think it’s by design. Based on the reports my managers have been asking me to generate about our work population, I’d say we’re in for a round of layoffs in early 2026.

I think working from home really changed expectations of the workforce. I was indifferent to working from home prior to Covid, but even with some of the drawbacks, working from home has prove immensely beneficial. I spend less money in clothing, commuting, and food and I have an extra 1.5 hours to myself each day because I don’t have to drive to and from work. Going back to the office is going to feel like a pay cut.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ludovic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/7ab992/32.png) [@Ludovic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ludovic)\
**Post date:** [July 14, 2025, 11:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/return-to-office-not-working-as-controlling-bosses-wanted-it/1020858/14 "2025-07-14T23:15:10Z")

</div>

> [@Chronos](#):
>
> This looks to me like the author got it backwards. College graduates facing record unemployment means that the market currently favors the employers, not the employees, so companies are free to restrict talent pools if they like.
> 
> Requiring RTO is probably still a bad idea. But the market conditions make it less bad, not more.

I agree that the conditions facing employees does not compound the problems of RTO for the employer. But it’s possible that the employment market conditions have shifted in a negative-sum rather than zero-sum way. Some people in employment-related subreddits think that we’re in a vicious cycle when employees know that they have to apply for more than an order of magnitude more jobs than they previously had to. So, even employers who want to hire people still have to wade through thousands of applications.

And, here is the kicker for employers. It would be good if they had thousands of enthusiastic, highly-qualified applicants to choose from. But in order to stand a chance, the prospective employees have to lower their own standards of when not to apply, resulting in those thousands of applications having a lot of chaff with the wheat.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Procrustus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/procrustus/32/2994_2.png) [@Procrustus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Procrustus)\
**Post date:** [July 14, 2025, 11:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/return-to-office-not-working-as-controlling-bosses-wanted-it/1020858/15 "2025-07-14T23:32:59Z")

</div>

> [@Dewey\_Finn](#):
>
> I’m a little surprised that was allowed. Someone asked in an all hands meeting at my employer and they said that we’re not set up for employing people outside the country.

Yeah, it’s probably not kosher. We deposit their paycheck into their domestic account. Maybe officially they’re in Tacoma or Boise.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dewey\_Finn](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dewey_finn/32/4222_2.png) [@Dewey\_Finn](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dewey_Finn)\
**Post date:** [July 14, 2025, 11:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/return-to-office-not-working-as-controlling-bosses-wanted-it/1020858/16 "2025-07-14T23:35:02Z")

</div>

Isn’t the country where they live going to want payroll taxes paid?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GIGObuster](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/gigobuster/32/421_2.png) [@GIGObuster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GIGObuster)\
**Post date:** [July 14, 2025, 11:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/return-to-office-not-working-as-controlling-bosses-wanted-it/1020858/17 "2025-07-14T23:44:22Z")

</div>

I depends on the country they moved to.

> **[4 Countries Without Income Taxes](https://www.investopedia.com/articles/personal-finance/100215/5-countries-without-income-taxes.asp)**
>
> Some of the most popular countries that offer the financial benefit of having no income tax are Bermuda, Monaco, the Bahamas, and the United Arab Emirates (UAE).

> Bermuda, Monaco, the Bahamas, and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) are four countries that don’t have personal income taxes.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ShadowFacts](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/shadowfacts/32/2934_2.png) [@ShadowFacts](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ShadowFacts)\
**Post date:** [July 14, 2025, 11:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/return-to-office-not-working-as-controlling-bosses-wanted-it/1020858/18 "2025-07-14T23:47:06Z")

</div>

> [@Dewey\_Finn](#):
>
> Isn’t the country where they live going to want payroll taxes paid

There are countries that have remote worker visas specifically for these kinds of arrangements.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Hari\_Seldon](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/hari_seldon/32/5173_2.png) [@Hari\_Seldon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Hari_Seldon)\
**Post date:** [July 15, 2025, 12:05am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/return-to-office-not-working-as-controlling-bosses-wanted-it/1020858/19 "2025-07-15T00:05:40Z")

</div>

My son spends a month here every year and I don’t think his employer has any idea he is out of the US. He should probably pay Canadian taxes on his earnings during that month, but no one knows he is working here.

Getting back to the OP, my son-in-law works for Amazon who has mandated BTO, but really hasn’t enforced it and isn’t really set up for everyone to come in. He is now actively searching for another job.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Saint\_Cad](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/saint_cad/32/18907_2.png) [@Saint\_Cad](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Saint_Cad)\
**Post date:** [July 15, 2025, 12:12am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/return-to-office-not-working-as-controlling-bosses-wanted-it/1020858/20 "2025-07-15T00:12:22Z")

</div>

> [@Dewey\_Finn](#):
>
> And some employees moved far away from their workplaces, even to different states. So RTO isn’t really possible for some.

Some were hired in different states because they were told they didn’t have to come to the office. Now their companies are telling them they have to move because of RTO.

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/return-to-office-not-working-as-controlling-bosses-wanted-it/1020858.md?page=2)
