# Riemann's posts in 'The Quarantine Zone' **URL:** \ **Category:** The BBQ Pit\ **Created:** [May 13, 2021, 6:27am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/riemanns-posts-in-the-quarantine-zone/941965 "2021-05-13T06:27:20Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 9
**Author:** ![Riemann](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/riemann/32/3133_2.png) [@Riemann](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Riemann)\ **Post date:** [May 13, 2021, 4:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/riemanns-posts-in-the-quarantine-zone/941965/9 "2021-05-13T16:24:55Z")
> [@ratatoskK](#): > > he’s being a dick An opinion that I’m _sure_ you arrived at through careful and objective consideration of the Quarantine Zone thread, and _not at all_ because I disputed your prescriptivist hogwash in this thread: > [@"waiting for" vs. "waiting on"](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/waiting-for-vs-waiting-on/941299): > > This question was inspired by the thread [“in to” vs. “into”](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/in-to-vs-into/941131) It drives me crazy when I hear something like, “I was waiting on so-and-so to get back to me about my question.” To me, this is a clear example where one should use “waiting for”. The phrase “waiting on” refers specifically to the sort of thing done by waiters and waitresses. It is an act of service, to stand by someone, and wait for their instructions. A lieutenant might wait on a general while the general decides what to do next. B… --- _[View the full topic](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/riemanns-posts-in-the-quarantine-zone/941965)._