# RIP Scalia

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/rip-scalia/746056>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [February 13, 2016, 10:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/rip-scalia/746056 "2016-02-13T22:39:35Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 188

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bricker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/977dab/32.png) [@Bricker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bricker)\
**Post date:** [February 15, 2016, 4:11am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/rip-scalia/746056/188 "2016-02-15T04:11:41Z")

</div>

> [@TonySinclair](#):
>
> Heh, after spending all of 2014 on Benghazi and all of 2015 on email servers, the right wingnuts are upset if anyone questions Scalia.

What?

I thought that was manufactured outrage.

I thought it so hard, I even started a thread that said as much:

> [@Hilary Clinton and the Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Personal E-mail Account](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hilary-clinton-and-the-terrible-horrible-no-good-very-bad-personal-e-mail-account/714092/1):
>
> Of course, some of those with an axe to grind against Secretary Clinton are now piously announcing their great concern for transparent retention of e-mail records.  
> .  
> .  
> .
> 
> To the extent it’s a violation, it’s one of NARA policy, and purely technical in nature. She used a personal account but sent mail to the [state.gov](http://state.gov) accounts of her staff, where that e-mail was properly retained as a record.
> 
> This is manufactured outrage.

Well?

---

_[View the full topic](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/rip-scalia/746056)._