# Rishi Sunak tries to lead the UK

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/rishi-sunak-tries-to-lead-the-uk/973706>\
**Category:** Politics & Elections\
**Created:** [October 24, 2022, 1:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/rishi-sunak-tries-to-lead-the-uk/973706 "2022-10-24T13:07:00Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Treppenwitz](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/treppenwitz/32/3445_2.png) [@Treppenwitz](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Treppenwitz)\
**Post date:** [October 25, 2022, 6:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/rishi-sunak-tries-to-lead-the-uk/973706/61 "2022-10-25T18:23:14Z")

</div>

The latest from the people who brought you Liz Truss:

> **[Tory members vent fury at Rishi Sunak’s coronation by MPs](https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-63388010)**
>
> Rishi Sunak's rise to Tory leader without a membership vote fuels discontent among the grassroots.

> Tory members [_party members, not MPs_] were poised to choose their next leader, as they did only weeks ago when they elected Ms Truss instead of Mr Sunak. But this time, [_party_] members were denied a vote, as Mr Sunak was elected unopposed as the only nominee with enough support among Tory MPs…
> 
> …For some [_party_] members, especially those who backed Ms Truss in the last Tory leadership contest, Mr Sunak’s appeal for unity rang hollow. Despite his conciliatory tone, those members feel ignored, or worse snubbed, by Tory MPs who they feel have overturned their will and sparked a fire of discontent at the party’s grassroots.

j

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JRDelirious](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jrdelirious/32/9531_2.png) [@JRDelirious](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JRDelirious)\
**Post date:** [October 25, 2022, 6:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/rishi-sunak-tries-to-lead-the-uk/973706/62 "2022-10-25T18:30:32Z")

</div>

> [@Gyrate](#):
>
> Labour could always, you know, “oppose” in their role as Opposition

The more I read these UK politics threads the more Labour sounds like my Democrats.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Elendil\_s\_Heir](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/7cd45c/32.png) [@Elendil\_s\_Heir](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Elendil_s_Heir)\
**Post date:** [October 25, 2022, 6:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/rishi-sunak-tries-to-lead-the-uk/973706/63 "2022-10-25T18:52:45Z")

</div>

Interesting article on the new PM’s wife:

> **[Akshata Murty: Rishi Sunak's wife is a software heiress who's richer than...](https://www.cnn.com/2022/10/25/business/akshata-murty-rishi-sunak-wife-profile-intl/index.html)**
>
> Rishi Sunak will not only be Britain's youngest leader for 200 years, he is the country's first non-White prime minister. And thanks largely to his wife Akshata Murty, Sunak will be one of the richest people to reach the top of the political...

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Folacin](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/folacin/32/3195_2.png) [@Folacin](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Folacin)\
**Post date:** [October 25, 2022, 7:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/rishi-sunak-tries-to-lead-the-uk/973706/64 "2022-10-25T19:03:00Z")

</div>

Yes, those party members did a bang up job last time, why wouldn’t the Tory MPs want them to choose again?

People cast aspersions on the good-old-boy, smoke-filled backrooms, but they generally produced candidates who were at least competent.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Pleonast](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pleonast/32/1183_2.png) [@Pleonast](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Pleonast)\
**Post date:** [October 25, 2022, 7:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/rishi-sunak-tries-to-lead-the-uk/973706/65 "2022-10-25T19:11:39Z")

</div>

> [@JRDelirious](#):
>
> > [@Gyrate](#):
> >
> > Labour could always, you know, “oppose” in their role as Opposition
> 
> The more I read these UK politics threads the more Labour sounds like my Democrats.

There is the old saying of “never interrupt your enemy’s errors”. Staking out a specific position gives the Tories either a good idea to steal or a bad idea to attack. Let them drown in their own internal squabbles.

The Democrats are more like the Tories: good in opposition, ineffective in power. (Maybe Labour is the same.)

The real problem that the Democrats (and maybe Labour) have is that they want to govern responsibly. And that doesn’t lend itself to distilling complex solutions into simple slogans.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Roderick\_Femm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/roderick_femm/32/14875_2.png) [@Roderick\_Femm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Roderick_Femm)\
**Post date:** [October 26, 2022, 2:54am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/rishi-sunak-tries-to-lead-the-uk/973706/66 "2022-10-26T02:54:58Z")

</div>

> [@Gyrate](#):
>
> Labour ought to have a very easy time in Opposition

Sorry I wasn’t clear. I wanted to know what Labour could usefully do _when they take power_, as everyone seems to assume they will at the next election.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![UDS1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/e47774/32.png) [@UDS1](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/UDS1)\
**Post date:** [October 26, 2022, 3:35am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/rishi-sunak-tries-to-lead-the-uk/973706/67 "2022-10-26T03:35:25Z")

</div>

Pivot towards a softer Brexit, so as to minimise the economic harm inflicted by hard Brexit, and so enhance the UK’s economic capacity to meet the challenges it faces.

Abandon notions of cutting taxes for the wealthy as a budgetary priority and refocus budgetary priorities on enhancing the productive capacity of the economy, for the same reason.

Stop wasting time, effort, energy, attention and public money on performative culture war issues and ensure that policy is driven by evidence rather than ideology and fantasy.

And, of course, simply govern with degree of rationality, consistency and stability that will enable business to make plans and will encourage investment.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Smid](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/838e76/32.png) [@Smid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Smid)\
**Post date:** [October 26, 2022, 9:35am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/rishi-sunak-tries-to-lead-the-uk/973706/68 "2022-10-26T09:35:42Z")

</div>

> [@UDS1](#):
>
> And, of course, simply govern with degree of rationality, consistency and stability that will enable business to make plans and will encourage investment.

Yeah, this one has been massively understated in recent times, talk to any exporter and they’ve had to pay huge money to get their systems working for the next stage of import/export from the EU, just to find it delayed again a week before the deadline. Then the rules change all over again. Then the tories change the laws again as some sort of Dogma to claim they’ve done something. There’s been huge amount of needless red tape in the last couple of years for british businesses.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Smid](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/838e76/32.png) [@Smid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Smid)\
**Post date:** [October 26, 2022, 10:03am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/rishi-sunak-tries-to-lead-the-uk/973706/69 "2022-10-26T10:03:31Z")

</div>

So… As usual they all start off thinking something will change when a new PM comes in, he’s going to be more sane, maybe he’s going to relax the war on the EU.

And then the first ludicrous act happens: Braverman back in the cabinet, someone sacked a week earlier for doing something stupid a SECOND time, not counting the mad statements about “tofu eating wokerati” and “I have a dream (of exporting brown people to Rwanda)”.

It’s full steam ahead on the crazy ship.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cervaise](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/cervaise/32/16693_2.png) [@Cervaise](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cervaise)\
**Post date:** [October 26, 2022, 10:51am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/rishi-sunak-tries-to-lead-the-uk/973706/70 "2022-10-26T10:51:02Z")

</div>

> [@Smid](#):
>
> It’s full steam ahead on the crazy ship.

A lot of outlets have described it as a “unity” cabinet, pulling in people with different loyalties to various factions within the party. But when the party is already tearing itself apart, how much unity can there really be?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Stanislaus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/stanislaus/32/3391_2.png) [@Stanislaus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Stanislaus)\
**Post date:** [October 26, 2022, 10:51am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/rishi-sunak-tries-to-lead-the-uk/973706/71 "2022-10-26T10:51:52Z")

</div>

> [@Smid](#):
>
> Braverman back in the cabinet, someone sacked a week earlier for doing something stupid a SECOND time

This is an astonishing move, given that not only was Braverman sacked, but in the “resignation” letter, she explicitly said that what she did was wrong, serious and a sacking offence; it was right for her to go.

It’s pretty obvious that this is a quid pro quo for her throwing nominations his way, but it was also always going to upset a lot of people and give Labour an immediate attack line _and he had a rock solid excuse for not doing it_

PMQs up shortly - this will definitely come up.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pjd](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pjd/32/3009_2.png) [@pjd](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/pjd)\
**Post date:** [October 26, 2022, 11:16am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/rishi-sunak-tries-to-lead-the-uk/973706/72 "2022-10-26T11:16:05Z")

</div>

> [@Stanislaus](#):
>
> PMQs up shortly - this will definitely come up.

It has.  
New boss, same as the old boss.  
Prick.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BlankSlate](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/blankslate/32/80_2.png) [@BlankSlate](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BlankSlate)\
**Post date:** [October 26, 2022, 2:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/rishi-sunak-tries-to-lead-the-uk/973706/73 "2022-10-26T14:25:56Z")

</div>

Like gerrymandering and the electoral college, these ‘coronations’ of prime ministers are a mockery of democracy. Nothing says ‘no confidence’ more than a resignation. A general election should be mandatory every time it happens.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dead\_Cat](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/9fc29f/32.png) [@Dead\_Cat](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dead_Cat)\
**Post date:** [October 26, 2022, 2:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/rishi-sunak-tries-to-lead-the-uk/973706/74 "2022-10-26T14:44:14Z")

</div>

Aside from the fact that any government making such a law is significantly more unlikely than the government of the day abolishing the first-past-the-post voting system, it has practical problems. For example, what if someone wins a general election, then resigns (say) 3 months later due to ill-health, leaving their deputy to take over? Hardly a good idea to mandate another election in such circumstances, it wouldn’t be worth the effort and expense.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Pardel-Lux](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pardel-lux/32/20182_2.png) [@Pardel-Lux](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Pardel-Lux)\
**Post date:** [October 26, 2022, 3:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/rishi-sunak-tries-to-lead-the-uk/973706/75 "2022-10-26T15:05:24Z")

</div>

> [@gnoitall](#):
>
> > [@PatrickLondon](#):
> >
> > My head is with Rishi, my heart is with Penny and my soul is with Boris.”
> 
> I can’t decide whether to pity that MP or be horrified by the abomination of it all.

Is he perhaps simply telling us that he has no heart, no soul and a hollow head?

> [@Gyrate](#):
>
> Labour ought to have a very easy time in Opposition given the absolute chaos in the Tory Party, and yet they just seem to do nothing of note at all. It doesn’t really sell them as the people who should be leading the country.

And there are no other parties in the UK? OK, the LibDems have imploded (rightly so!), the UKIP fools went home to inebriate (wish them a painful hangover), the Tories are committing harakiri (first time ever I wish them success in their endeavour), Labour does not want to be voted into office (no comment), so what’s left? The Greens? Could the Scottish National Party or Sinn Féin take over the whole of the UK? (At least that would solve the independence question) Just wondering, I read somewhere that nature abhorrs voids, despite what has been living in No. 10 recently. Whenever the next election takes place, somebody will have to win it, much as would like a [hung parliament](https://schumanchu.eu/html/l/l_00016wellhungparliament.html).  
Just as an aside: this description reminds me of the last elections here in Berlin. I discarded all parties, one after the other, until only a satirical party was left. Which, of course, isn’t a solution. But a statement.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SanVito](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/sanvito/32/2805_2.png) [@SanVito](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SanVito)\
**Post date:** [October 26, 2022, 3:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/rishi-sunak-tries-to-lead-the-uk/973706/76 "2022-10-26T15:21:35Z")

</div>

Labour will win it, and they want to win it, not sure where you get the idea they don’t. Their efforts are currently focused on bashing the Tories, they aren’t going to write a manifesto for the Tories to cherry pick the good bits.

The other parties are too small to make a significant impact. Sinn Féin don’t take their seats as they won’t swear allegiance to the Crown. The Greens have one MP. Lib Dems have had power within a coalition in recent history, but it was with the Tories, so damaged their reputation to catastrophic proportions. Scottish National Party can only ever have a maximum of 57 seats, but I guess they could go into coalition with Labour, if necessary. Not sure how keen Labour would be on on that though.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Roderick\_Femm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/roderick_femm/32/14875_2.png) [@Roderick\_Femm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Roderick_Femm)\
**Post date:** [October 26, 2022, 3:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/rishi-sunak-tries-to-lead-the-uk/973706/77 "2022-10-26T15:50:13Z")

</div>

> [@UDS1](#):
>
> Pivot towards a softer Brexit, so as to minimise the economic harm inflicted by hard Brexit, and so enhance the UK’s economic capacity to meet the challenges it faces.
> 
> Abandon notions of cutting taxes for the wealthy as a budgetary priority and refocus budgetary priorities on enhancing the productive capacity of the economy, for the same reason.
> 
> Stop wasting time, effort, energy, attention and public money on performative culture war issues and ensure that policy is driven by evidence rather than ideology and fantasy.
> 
> And, of course, simply govern with degree of rationality, consistency and stability that will enable business to make plans and will encourage investment.

Thank you. Those steps seem pretty reasonable, and not particularly left wing just not predatorily pro-rich people. Is there any way a Tory PM could push any of these as policy? I mean, if they are going to lose the next election anyway, why not try to do good in the meantime? Do they have to stay locked into their current self-destructive path?

I know the above sounds hopelessly naive; as I mentioned, I am pretty ignorant of current UK political realpolitik.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pjd](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pjd/32/3009_2.png) [@pjd](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/pjd)\
**Post date:** [October 26, 2022, 3:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/rishi-sunak-tries-to-lead-the-uk/973706/78 "2022-10-26T15:59:23Z")

</div>

> [@Roderick\_Femm](#):
>
> I mean, if they are going to lose the next election anyway, why not try to do good in the meantime?

You seem to be forgetting that the tory party is populated by tories.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Roderick\_Femm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/roderick_femm/32/14875_2.png) [@Roderick\_Femm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Roderick_Femm)\
**Post date:** [October 26, 2022, 4:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/rishi-sunak-tries-to-lead-the-uk/973706/79 "2022-10-26T16:01:20Z")

</div>

Not forgetting, but not particularly familiar with the breed. Are Tories obliged to pursue self-destructive policies until the country goes under, no matter what? How is that in their own interest?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pjd](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pjd/32/3009_2.png) [@pjd](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/pjd)\
**Post date:** [October 26, 2022, 4:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/rishi-sunak-tries-to-lead-the-uk/973706/80 "2022-10-26T16:11:24Z")

</div>

Tories (especially the current lot) are obliged to pursue self-serving policies even, if  
the country goes under (see Brexit).

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/rishi-sunak-tries-to-lead-the-uk/973706.md?page=3)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/rishi-sunak-tries-to-lead-the-uk/973706.md?page=5)
