In other words, you’re a liar. You can’t cite me calling anybody an anti-Semite because you simply made it up. You can’t cite me calling "half " of anybody anti-Semites because you made that up too. And you’re claiming that I said something else (roughly equivelent, you swear!) to anti-Semite, but you can’t cite that, either. And of course pointing out that you’re a liar is “nitpicky” but slandering me is cool.
Of course, I didn’t think you had the guts to answer why it is that the lies you tell don’t go pointed out by others. You just admitted to lying when you claimed I’d called you an anti-Semite, and nobody pointed that out. There’s your answer right there; you can admit you were simply making shit up, and not one person on your “side” says anything to you about it.
That was my point, you are not only a bigot, you are the kind of cowardly little shit that blames his bigotry on other people. Yes, I’m the puppet master, I made you into a bigot. Kay. And as for your claim that people are okay with admissions of bigotry as long as the bigot is arguing with me, well… that says a lot about them. And you that you’re stupid enough to believe that’s acceptable.
But again you serve as an object lesson. If it was bigotry against a ‘protected’ minority, people would be up in arms and your defense would sound like the standard bigoted asshole’s apologia. “Oh, a black man was really annoying, so I’m justified in having a knee-jerk anti black reaction!” But no, Finn was a meanie to you, so people nod and say sure, you can be bigoted against Israel.
And you’re not honest enough to realize that’s not a good thing.
Standard dishonesty from you. Carter has been shown to have been systematically and reliably totally ‘honestly wrong’ about dozens of facts. And yes, despite your defense of a fellow anti-Israel crusader (yet again, ask yourself if you’d be fine with an anti-Palestinian liar, and why or why not). The issue isn’t “gee, we can’t tell intent!” because in some cases Carter admitted that he was wrong before going on and publishing the same fictions, again. In other cases he absolutely had to know and then the question becomes if he’s a deliberate liar or merely senile. Championing a senile bigot is hardly better than a lying bigot, though.
And that’s the point you are deliberately missing.
Although you’ve refused to honestly discuss why you continually lie about me or why you think your fellow travelers accept it, this against shows what you’re about. Sure, Jimmy Carter’s polemics against Israel, provably, contain dozens of major factual inaccuracies that undermine his premise as he uses them as main supporting details that are often in diametric opposition to the actual facts. In many cases, Carter either should have known the truth or did know and then still chose to publish lies.
But that’s not important, because in looking at how Carter’s argument is build on “honest errors” and outright lies, you still want it to “not look at bad”. Sure, Carter can’t get basic facts straight and wrote things he knew weren’t true, but can’t we do something to make him not look so bad? After all, he’s [fill in the blank].
A) A snappy dresser
B) got a divine singing voice
C) a killer vuvuzela player
D) anti-Israel, like the people who want to champion his writings on the subject
Of course, we all know what would happen if someone published a massive polemic laying into Palestine and exonerating Israel, you’d go berserk. Hell, you go berserk when the actual facts are cited and claim that they’re not being used “objectively” enough for you.
The term is accurate. But what a service liars and bigots get from some folks here, all you have to do is consistently lie or be bigoted, and if someone points it out when you’re doing it, why, you get off the hook.
Idiots are free to call me an asshole for minding liars and bigots.
Of course, they’re generally the actual assholes as they don’t mind lying or bigotry, but do mind someone pointing it out.
And, of course your question is rather disingenuous. How about: at least ever, at all. Most of the folks whiniing about how bigots get called bigots or liars get called out for lying haven’t posted, even once, ever, to challenge that shit since either it’s on their “side” or they don’t care about the facts but boy oh boy the accusations annoy them.
Getting annoyed by stylistic rigidity is your perogative, of course. As you’ve admitted that you’d care at all if my accusations are true or not, I really don’t care whether or not you think true accusations are being made more often than you’d like.
You see a topic with one admitted bigot and another obvious bigot posting, and it’s horrible, just horrible that I pointed it out. Obviously that’s a mighty good deal with some of the more rabid anti-Israel crowed. They can post with as much bigotry as they’d like, and they have folks ready to defend them, while admitting that they don’t care about the charges, simply because the word “bigot” was used.
Same old same old. he was convicted of rape by deception, which has been clarified numerous times in this thread, over and over and over.
Why did you post something that you know not to be true and that was, in fact, debunked by your own quote right above it? Another case dealt with, for instance, a man pretending to be a neurosurgeon to make women think he was more desirable than he was. It’s in your own cite. You couldn’t have missed it.
Why is it that you’d post something that your own cite says isn’t true?
And, of course, the Anti-Stylistic Rigidity Warriors couldn’t be bothered to notice that ‘honest error’ either. Totally unexpected.