# Rotten Tomatoes, IMDB or NetFlix, which rating more closely matches yours?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/rotten-tomatoes-imdb-or-netflix-which-rating-more-closely-matches-yours/409213>\
**Category:** Cafe Society\
**Created:** [June 24, 2007, 2:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/rotten-tomatoes-imdb-or-netflix-which-rating-more-closely-matches-yours/409213 "2007-06-24T14:33:15Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 13\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Khadaji](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/9e8a1a/32.png) [@Khadaji](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Khadaji)\
**Post date:** [June 24, 2007, 2:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/rotten-tomatoes-imdb-or-netflix-which-rating-more-closely-matches-yours/409213/1 "2007-06-24T14:33:15Z")

</div>

It is probably a close tie between Rotten Tomatoes and NetFlix. RT usually does a good job, but sometimes way off. Netflix is harder to judge because it only allows four stars. More granularity would help.

IMDB is the worst of the 3, often giving great ratings to terrible movies and bad ratings to movies I like.

How about you?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_DiFool](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_difool/32/19543_2.png) [@John\_DiFool](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_DiFool)\
**Post date:** [June 24, 2007, 2:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/rotten-tomatoes-imdb-or-netflix-which-rating-more-closely-matches-yours/409213/2 "2007-06-24T14:53:39Z")

</div>

I trust IMDB when it comes to older movies; for newer ones it is virtually worthless for at least a month (often several months) after the release date because of all the idiot votes (1’s and 10’s) a new movie invariably gets, and even then there have been several recent films whose IMDB ratings I still don’t trust, at all (_Snakes on a Plane_ anyone?). RT is better for new releases, but I dislike the binary rating system (thumbs up…err fresh or rotten). I don’t pay attention to Netflix’s ratings even though I am a member because just about everything is between 3.5 and 4.5 stars (inclusive), too coarse a scale to rely on.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Harmonious\_Discord](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/74df32/32.png) [@Harmonious\_Discord](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Harmonious_Discord)\
**Post date:** [June 24, 2007, 3:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/rotten-tomatoes-imdb-or-netflix-which-rating-more-closely-matches-yours/409213/3 "2007-06-24T15:10:35Z")

</div>

The person I think does a good job at reviews is The Filthy Critic.  
[The Filthy Critic](http://www.bigempire.com/filthy/)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![don\_t\_ask](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/e68b1a/32.png) [@don\_t\_ask](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/don_t_ask)\
**Post date:** [June 24, 2007, 3:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/rotten-tomatoes-imdb-or-netflix-which-rating-more-closely-matches-yours/409213/4 "2007-06-24T15:21:36Z")

</div>

I have discovered so many good movies, TV shows, books and CDs at [Metacritic](http://www.metacritic.com/) that barely a week goes by without me checking it. The scoring method is far better than the Rotten Tomatoes model.

Everyone I have recommended it to uses it now.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![some\_white\_dude](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/b487fb/32.png) [@some\_white\_dude](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/some_white_dude)\
**Post date:** [June 24, 2007, 9:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/rotten-tomatoes-imdb-or-netflix-which-rating-more-closely-matches-yours/409213/5 "2007-06-24T21:41:44Z")

</div>

Nearly every Netflix rating I see is somewhere in the vicinity of four stars, so they’re pretty useless to me. Rotten Tomatoes is generally pretty accurate. I don’t really pay attention to IMDb’s ratings, aside from checking out their top 100 or whatever it is every once in a while.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MovieMogul](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/f08c70/32.png) [@MovieMogul](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MovieMogul)\
**Post date:** [June 24, 2007, 9:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/rotten-tomatoes-imdb-or-netflix-which-rating-more-closely-matches-yours/409213/6 "2007-06-24T21:47:10Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=don’t ask]  
I have discovered so many good movies, TV shows, books and CDs at [Metacritic](http://www.metacritic.com/) that barely a week goes by without me checking it. The scoring method is far better than the Rotten Tomatoes model.

Everyone I have recommended it to uses it now.  
[/QUOTE]  
I’ll second that. IMDB skews way too much towards fans, RT suffers from the black/white, either/or mentality, and I don’t get Netflix. Metacritic is more nuanced in its approach (using a sliding scale) and more discriminating as well (not every random Tom/Dick blog gets cited).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![1point618](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/1/c57346/32.png) [@1point618](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/1point618)\
**Post date:** [June 25, 2007, 2:26am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/rotten-tomatoes-imdb-or-netflix-which-rating-more-closely-matches-yours/409213/7 "2007-06-25T02:26:38Z")

</div>

I’ve found that the reviewers at [www.chud.com](http://www.chud.com) tend to have very similar tastes to mine (except when it comes to horror) so I’ve begun trusting them for the most part. Metacritic looks promising though.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Frostillicus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/e9bcb4/32.png) [@Frostillicus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Frostillicus)\
**Post date:** [June 25, 2007, 2:31am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/rotten-tomatoes-imdb-or-netflix-which-rating-more-closely-matches-yours/409213/8 "2007-06-25T02:31:13Z")

</div>

Netflix uses a 5 star rating, not 4 stars. I should know; I just rated a movie five minutes ago.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Geobabe](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/geobabe/32/3908_2.png) [@Geobabe](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Geobabe)\
**Post date:** [June 25, 2007, 4:30am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/rotten-tomatoes-imdb-or-netflix-which-rating-more-closely-matches-yours/409213/9 "2007-06-25T04:30:30Z")

</div>

[movielens](http://movielens.umn.edu) is a neat site; it’s a computing project at U of Minnesota, and you have to spend some time rating movies you’ve already seen, but once you’ve done that, it’s very accurate, IME. I’ve only had a handful that I’ve rated significantly differently than the predicted rating.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Raza](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/raza/32/213_2.png) [@Raza](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Raza)\
**Post date:** [June 25, 2007, 4:40am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/rotten-tomatoes-imdb-or-netflix-which-rating-more-closely-matches-yours/409213/10 "2007-06-25T04:40:51Z")

</div>

Another two thumbs up for Metacritic. I’ve been relying on them for a couple of years, for both movies and games. But what is the “sliding scale” of which ArchiveGuy speaks?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Siam\_Sam](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/d78d45/32.png) [@Siam\_Sam](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Siam_Sam)\
**Post date:** [June 25, 2007, 4:46am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/rotten-tomatoes-imdb-or-netflix-which-rating-more-closely-matches-yours/409213/11 "2007-06-25T04:46:29Z")

</div>

Roger Ebert and I – and the wife – tend to have the same tastes. We’re glad he’s returning, albeit slowly.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Khadaji](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/9e8a1a/32.png) [@Khadaji](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Khadaji)\
**Post date:** [June 25, 2007, 11:02am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/rotten-tomatoes-imdb-or-netflix-which-rating-more-closely-matches-yours/409213/12 "2007-06-25T11:02:26Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Frostillicus]  
Netflix uses a 5 star rating, not 4 stars. I should know; I just rated a movie five minutes ago.  
[/QUOTE]

lol. Yes, thank you for pointing out my typo! You see, the _5_ key and the \*4 \*key are right next to each other on my keyboard. Sometimes I hit the wrong key. Well spotted! 😛

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MovieMogul](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/f08c70/32.png) [@MovieMogul](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MovieMogul)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2007, 4:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/rotten-tomatoes-imdb-or-netflix-which-rating-more-closely-matches-yours/409213/13 "2007-07-12T16:59:01Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Raza]  
Another two thumbs up for Metacritic. I’ve been relying on them for a couple of years, for both movies and games. But what is the “sliding scale” of which ArchiveGuy speaks?  
[/QUOTE]  
Rotten Tomatoes gets a percentage simply from a Good/Bad, Yes/No mode of thinking. Which means a 90% may mean 90% of the critics may have thought it was OK/pretty good, but nowhere near as praiseworthy as the percentage suggests.

Metacritic evaluates each critic’s response and level of enthusiasm toward the film in assigning a number value. Sure, it’s a little more subjective, but it also more clearly helps delineate those films that have large-but-tepid support vs. large-and-jubilant support. RT makes no distinction.
