[QUOTE=Jackmannii]
Not that Rush’s behavior sounds nifty, but he supposedly wasparodying an op-ed in the L.A. Times by David Ehrenstein:
"The Times op-ed, written by cultural critic David Ehrenstein, is headlined "Obama the ‘Magic Negro.’ " Ehrenstein invoked the cinematic trope of the “Magic Negro,” which he defined as follows:
The Magic Negro is a figure of postmodern folk culture, coined by snarky 20th century sociologists, to explain a cultural figure who emerged in the wake of Brown vs. Board of Education. “He has no past, he simply appears one day to help the white protagonist,” reads the description on Wikipedia .
He’s there to assuage white “guilt” (i.e., the minimal discomfort they feel) over the role of slavery and racial segregation in American history, while replacing stereotypes of a dangerous, highly sexualized black man with a benign figure for whom interracial sexual congress holds no interest.
As might be expected, this figure is chiefly cinematic – embodied by such noted performers as Sidney Poitier, Morgan Freeman, Scatman Crothers, Michael Clarke Duncan, Will Smith and, most recently, Don Cheadle. And that’s not to mention a certain basketball player whose very nickname is “Magic.”
Ehrenstein concluded: “Like a comic-book superhero, Obama is there to help, out of the sheer goodness of a heart we need not know or understand. For as with all Magic Negroes, the less real he seems, the more desirable he becomes. If he were real, white America couldn’t project all its fantasies of curative black benevolence on him.” "
And Limbaugh could hardly be trying to one-up Imus, since he Limbaugh parody was aired days before Imus got into trouble.
[/QUOTE]
Morgan Freeman doesn’t count. He IS God, or haven’t you noticed?