# Ruth Actually Hit 718 HRs and Maris had 62 HRs in '61.

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ruth-actually-hit-718-hrs-and-maris-had-62-hrs-in-61/809725>\
**Category:** The Game Room\
**Created:** [February 28, 2018, 3:53am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ruth-actually-hit-718-hrs-and-maris-had-62-hrs-in-61/809725 "2018-02-28T03:53:55Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mangosteen](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/6a8cbe/32.png) [@Mangosteen](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mangosteen)\
**Post date:** [February 28, 2018, 3:53am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ruth-actually-hit-718-hrs-and-maris-had-62-hrs-in-61/809725/1 "2018-02-28T03:53:55Z")

</div>

Ruth Actually Hit 718 HRs (lifetime) and Maris had 62 HRs in '61, but the home runs were hit early in a game that was either rained out or for some reason called before the game was “official”. Thus all the stats are thrown out.

On July 17, 1961 in Baltimore Maris hit a home run that was nullified because it started raining in the fifth inning. Had his July 17 home run counted, Maris would have hit number 59 during his game 154 (still missing Ruth’s record) and number 60 during his game 158. And eventually go on to hit 62 that year.

Ruth lost two HRs to rain outs and two more when his home run balls bounced out of the stands and back on the field. The umpires mistakenly called the plays a “double” instead of a home run.  
How many strikeouts did Nolan Ryan _really_ throw. Certainly more than the 5,714 he is credited with.

IMHO this is BS. How does MLB justify this injustice?  
,

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![running\_coach](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/running_coach/32/15836_2.png) [@running\_coach](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/running_coach)\
**Post date:** [February 28, 2018, 3:59am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ruth-actually-hit-718-hrs-and-maris-had-62-hrs-in-61/809725/2 "2018-02-28T03:59:52Z")

</div>

[Armando Galarraga’s near-perfect game.](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armando_Galarraga%27s_near-perfect_game)  
In 1991, MLB changed the rules of what defined a no-hitter, wiping out 31 no-hitters including Haddix’s 12 perfect inning effort because he gave up a hit in the 13th… Yet, they couldn’t go back 24 hours, with video evidence and the umpire’s admission to his mistake, to fix a “blown perfect game” that was the fault of a league official.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kent\_Clark](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kent_clark/32/105_2.png) [@Kent\_Clark](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kent_Clark)\
**Post date:** [February 28, 2018, 4:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ruth-actually-hit-718-hrs-and-maris-had-62-hrs-in-61/809725/3 "2018-02-28T16:27:50Z")

</div>

Let’s not forget [Hank Aaron](https://retrosimba.com/2012/02/17/hank-aaron-and-the-home-run-that-wasnt-vs-cardinals/).

> [@](#):
>
> Pelekoudas, in his sixth season as a National League umpire, ruled that Aaron’s left foot was in front of the batter’s box and thus Aaron had hit the ball illegally.

I’m willing to be that virtually every professional athlete can point to an “injustice” with the rules.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Telemark](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/telemark/32/372_2.png) [@Telemark](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Telemark)\
**Post date:** [February 28, 2018, 4:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ruth-actually-hit-718-hrs-and-maris-had-62-hrs-in-61/809725/4 "2018-02-28T16:42:02Z")

</div>

> [@Mangosteen](#):
>
> How many strikeouts did Nolan Ryan _really_ throw. Certainly more than the 5,714 he is credited with.

A strike is only a strike when the ump calls it a strike. There is no other definition.

> [@Mangosteen](#):
>
> IMHO this is BS. How does MLB justify this injustice?

I’m not seeing any injustice. Can you clarify?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RickJay](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/bb73d2/32.png) [@RickJay](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RickJay)\
**Post date:** [February 28, 2018, 4:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ruth-actually-hit-718-hrs-and-maris-had-62-hrs-in-61/809725/5 "2018-02-28T16:59:18Z")

</div>

> [@Mangosteen](#):
>
> How many strikeouts did Nolan Ryan _really_ throw. Certainly more than the 5,714 he is credited with.
> 
> IMHO this is BS. How does MLB justify this injustice?  
> ,

This strikes me as being rather easily justified; a player’s statistics in a game that does not count should not count.

The sum total of all statistics should be an accurate total of the statistics accumulated in championship games, that is, games that actually count as wins and losses in the standings. If a team goes 88-74 and in those 162 games accumulates 143 home runs, the of all individual home run totals should be 143.

I don’t know if you like this justification - personally, I like it - but there it is.

I do not understand how this constitutes an injustice. Players are not entitled to statistics or records or particular numbers. The numbers simply are what they are.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Little\_Nemo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/little_nemo/32/3120_2.png) [@Little\_Nemo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Little_Nemo)\
**Post date:** [February 28, 2018, 5:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ruth-actually-hit-718-hrs-and-maris-had-62-hrs-in-61/809725/6 "2018-02-28T17:10:45Z")

</div>

I don’t see it as an injustice as long as the method for counting records is clear and it’s applied to all players. If Ruth and Maris and Ryan “lost” some of their accomplishments because of the way records are counted, then other players lost some of their accomplishments as well.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jackmannii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jackmannii/32/311_2.png) [@Jackmannii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jackmannii)\
**Post date:** [February 28, 2018, 5:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ruth-actually-hit-718-hrs-and-maris-had-62-hrs-in-61/809725/7 "2018-02-28T17:11:11Z")

</div>

Bob Feller might well be among the top ten all time leaders in wins if it wasn’t for WWII costing him several years of playing time (figure 20 wins a year, carry the 2, hmmm).

How can MLB justify the injustice of not adding to his numbers?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ElvisL1ves](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/5daacb/32.png) [@ElvisL1ves](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ElvisL1ves)\
**Post date:** [February 28, 2018, 5:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ruth-actually-hit-718-hrs-and-maris-had-62-hrs-in-61/809725/8 "2018-02-28T17:12:40Z")

</div>

How many homers did Ted Williams lose to his WW2 and Korea service, in his prime years? Of course, Ted didn’t consider those years lost.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mhendo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mhendo/32/3159_2.png) [@mhendo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mhendo)\
**Post date:** [February 28, 2018, 5:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ruth-actually-hit-718-hrs-and-maris-had-62-hrs-in-61/809725/9 "2018-02-28T17:12:43Z")

</div>

> [@RickJay](#):
>
> This strikes me as being rather easily justified; a player’s statistics in a game that does not count should not count.
> 
> The sum total of all statistics should be an accurate total of the statistics accumulated in championship games, that is, games that actually count as wins and losses in the standings. If a team goes 88-74 and in those 162 games accumulates 143 home runs, the of all individual home run totals should be 143.
> 
> I don’t know if you like this justification - personally, I like it - but there it is.
> 
> I do not understand how this constitutes an injustice. Players are not entitled to statistics or records or particular numbers. The numbers simply are what they are.

Yep, this is pretty much my take on the matter.

> [@running\_coach](#):
>
> [Armando Galarraga’s near-perfect game.](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armando_Galarraga%27s_near-perfect_game)  
> In 1991, MLB changed the rules of what defined a no-hitter, wiping out 31 no-hitters including Haddix’s 12 perfect inning effort because he gave up a hit in the 13th… Yet, they couldn’t go back 24 hours, with video evidence and the umpire’s admission to his mistake, to fix a “blown perfect game” that was the fault of a league official.

What happened to Galarraga sucked big time, but there’s an important difference in principle here.

Changing Galarraga’s outing to a Perfect Game would require actually altering the in-game boxscore. A perfect game is 27 batters up, and 27 batters down, with no-one reaching base. But in that game, when the bad “safe” call was made at first, a runner reached base and another hitter came to the plate. That next hitter then recorded an out. In order to give Galarraga his due, you would have to turn a base hit into an out, and you would have to actually erase an out from the game’s data.

None of that was required for MLB’s 1991 rule change.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![running\_coach](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/running_coach/32/15836_2.png) [@running\_coach](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/running_coach)\
**Post date:** [February 28, 2018, 5:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ruth-actually-hit-718-hrs-and-maris-had-62-hrs-in-61/809725/10 "2018-02-28T17:20:55Z")

</div>

> [@Jackmannii](#):
>
> Bob Feller might well be among the top ten all time leaders in wins if it wasn’t for WWII costing him several years of playing time (figure 20 wins a year, carry the 2, hmmm).
> 
> How can MLB justify the injustice of not adding to his numbers?

Mays would have almost certainly passed Ruth if he hadn’t served. And look at the time Williams lost.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Skywatcher](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/skywatcher/32/254_2.png) [@Skywatcher](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Skywatcher)\
**Post date:** [February 28, 2018, 5:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ruth-actually-hit-718-hrs-and-maris-had-62-hrs-in-61/809725/11 "2018-02-28T17:35:46Z")

</div>

> [@Mangosteen](#):
>
> How does MLB justify this injustice?

[Exhibition game - Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exhibition_game#Baseball) 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_DiFool](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_difool/32/19543_2.png) [@John\_DiFool](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_DiFool)\
**Post date:** [February 28, 2018, 6:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ruth-actually-hit-718-hrs-and-maris-had-62-hrs-in-61/809725/12 "2018-02-28T18:25:54Z")

</div>

Ruth lost one when he hit a game winning homer out of the park, but where the rules of the time only let the winning run score-he got credited with a double.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Colibri](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/colibri/32/1841_2.png) [@Colibri](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Colibri)\
**Post date:** [February 28, 2018, 6:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ruth-actually-hit-718-hrs-and-maris-had-62-hrs-in-61/809725/13 "2018-02-28T18:30:52Z")

</div>

Up until 1931, a ball that bounced over the fence on one hop was considered a home run. These are now considered ground-rule doubles.

Apparently none of Ruth’s homers were such “bounce” home runs. But they certainly must have contributed to the totals of many other players.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![OldGuy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/3bc359/32.png) [@OldGuy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/OldGuy)\
**Post date:** [February 28, 2018, 9:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ruth-actually-hit-718-hrs-and-maris-had-62-hrs-in-61/809725/14 "2018-02-28T21:56:51Z")

</div>

To put it another way. If a team has a rainout, the game is rescheduled. So a batter has 162 + a fraction games to hit home runs in. Why should he get this advantage over another palyer with no rainouts?

And let’s not get into the asterisk hullabaloo when they changed the schedule to 162 games from 154.

The thing that does bother me a bit is when they describe postseason records and compare current players with three post-season series to the oldtimers with only the World Series.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Robot\_Arm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/robot_arm/32/18280_2.png) [@Robot\_Arm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Robot_Arm)\
**Post date:** [February 28, 2018, 10:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ruth-actually-hit-718-hrs-and-maris-had-62-hrs-in-61/809725/15 "2018-02-28T22:16:41Z")

</div>

> [@mhendo](#):
>
> What happened to Galarraga sucked big time, but there’s an important difference in principle here.
> 
> Changing Galarraga’s outing to a Perfect Game would require actually altering the in-game boxscore. A perfect game is 27 batters up, and 27 batters down, with no-one reaching base. But in that game, when the bad “safe” call was made at first, a runner reached base and another hitter came to the plate. That next hitter then recorded an out. In order to give Galarraga his due, you would have to turn a base hit into an out, and you would have to actually erase an out from the game’s data.

I maintain that Galarraga is more famous for missing the perfect game than he would be if he’d gotten it. If the ump had gotten the call right, everyone would have cheered, and we’d all know what an awesome game he pitched that day, and SportsCenter would say “that’s the 20th perfect game in MLB history”. As amazing and rare as that feat is, it would have been just another perfect game. But as it happened, everybody knows he deserved a perfect game, but didn’t get it. I checked Wikipedia; there were two other perfect games that season and there have been three more sense then. Without looking, can you name any of those pitchers?

I don’t know if that’s any consolation to Galarraga, but I think it’s an interesting way to look at it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kent\_Clark](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kent_clark/32/105_2.png) [@Kent\_Clark](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kent_Clark)\
**Post date:** [February 28, 2018, 10:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ruth-actually-hit-718-hrs-and-maris-had-62-hrs-in-61/809725/16 "2018-02-28T22:24:42Z")

</div>

In 1929 the St. Louis Browns put an 11’ fence above the right field wall. It’s pretty well accepted that at least one of Ruth’s home runs in St. Louis in 1927 would have hit the fence, while at least one of Jimmie Foxx’s 1933 doubles in St. Louis would have gone into the stands.

If that had happened, Foxx and Ruth would have each ended up with 59 home runs in their best seasons.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jaycat](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jaycat/32/3015_2.png) [@jaycat](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/jaycat)\
**Post date:** [February 28, 2018, 11:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ruth-actually-hit-718-hrs-and-maris-had-62-hrs-in-61/809725/17 "2018-02-28T23:16:21Z")

</div>

One of the funnest games I ever watched was Red Sox Matt Young’s 1992, 8-inning, [no-hitter](http://www.baseball-almanac.com/boxscore/04121992.shtml) against the Indians. He gave up 7 walks and 6 steals and lost the game 2-1. The woulda-been no-hitter (totally legit IMO) was erased by the rule change.

I mean, what was he supposed to do? Insist that the Indians take their last at-bat in the bottom of the 9th?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![running\_coach](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/running_coach/32/15836_2.png) [@running\_coach](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/running_coach)\
**Post date:** [February 28, 2018, 11:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ruth-actually-hit-718-hrs-and-maris-had-62-hrs-in-61/809725/18 "2018-02-28T23:35:10Z")

</div>

> [@jaycat](#):
>
> One of the funnest games I ever watched was Red Sox Matt Young’s 1992, 8-inning, [no-hitter](http://www.baseball-almanac.com/boxscore/04121992.shtml) against the Indians. He gave up 7 walks and 6 steals and lost the game 2-1. The woulda-been no-hitter (totally legit IMO) was erased by the rule change.
> 
> I mean, what was he supposed to do? Insist that the Indians take their last at-bat in the bottom of the 9th?

I’ve often heard the phrase “facing the minimum” meaning 27 batters. It’s possible to do that and not pitch a perfect game, a walk and caught stealing or a double play will do it.  
I agree you have to do the full nine innings/27 outs to qualify.

[23 no-hitters and three perfect games lost with two outs in the ninth.](http://research.sabr.org/journals/with-two-out-in-the-ninth-the-almost-no-hitters)  
No idea how many with 0 or 1 out.  
That’s why you play nine.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BlankSlate](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/blankslate/32/80_2.png) [@BlankSlate](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BlankSlate)\
**Post date:** [March 1, 2018, 1:05am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ruth-actually-hit-718-hrs-and-maris-had-62-hrs-in-61/809725/19 "2018-03-01T01:05:09Z")

</div>

> [@jaycat](#):
>
> One of the funnest games I ever watched was Red Sox Matt Young’s 1992, 8-inning, [no-hitter](http://www.baseball-almanac.com/boxscore/04121992.shtml) against the Indians. He gave up 7 walks and 6 steals and lost the game 2-1. The woulda-been no-hitter (totally legit IMO) was erased by the rule change.
> 
> I mean, what was he supposed to do? Insist that the Indians take their last at-bat in the bottom of the 9th?

Ha ha, I missed that one. That was only two years after the Yankees’ Andy Hawkins lost an eight inning “no hitter” 4-0 to the White Sox. I was listening to the game on the radio at the time, but I couldn’t tell you all the things that went wrong. Those were some dark days.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Colibri](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/colibri/32/1841_2.png) [@Colibri](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Colibri)\
**Post date:** [March 1, 2018, 3:22am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ruth-actually-hit-718-hrs-and-maris-had-62-hrs-in-61/809725/20 "2018-03-01T03:22:03Z")

</div>

> [@Robot\_Arm](#):
>
> I maintain that Galarraga is more famous for missing the perfect game than he would be if he’d gotten it. If the ump had gotten the call right, everyone would have cheered, and we’d all know what an awesome game he pitched that day, and SportsCenter would say “that’s the 20th perfect game in MLB history”. As amazing and rare as that feat is, it would have been just another perfect game. But as it happened, everybody knows he deserved a perfect game, but didn’t get it. I checked Wikipedia; there were two other perfect games that season and there have been three more sense then. Without looking, can you name any of those pitchers?
> 
> I don’t know if that’s any consolation to Galarraga, but I think it’s an interesting way to look at it.

Harvey Haddix is probably more famous for having pitched 12 perfect innings than if he had won a 9 inning perfect game.

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ruth-actually-hit-718-hrs-and-maris-had-62-hrs-in-61/809725.md?page=2)
