# Sample Math Problem from OECD International HS test

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sample-math-problem-from-oecd-international-hs-test/675375>\
**Category:** Miscellaneous and Personal Stuff I Must Share\
**Created:** [December 3, 2013, 3:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sample-math-problem-from-oecd-international-hs-test/675375 "2013-12-03T15:19:49Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Terr](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/839c29/32.png) [@Terr](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Terr)\
**Post date:** [December 4, 2013, 5:54am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sample-math-problem-from-oecd-international-hs-test/675375/41 "2013-12-04T05:54:07Z")

</div>

> [@Dr.Strangelove](#):
>
> You (or they?) left out an utterly critical constraint, which is that each letter stands for a _different_ digit. Without that, F could be anywhere from 0 to 4.

I was writing from memory. I am sure they formulated it correctly.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jragon](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/e19b73/32.png) [@Jragon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jragon)\
**Post date:** [December 4, 2013, 6:06am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sample-math-problem-from-oecd-international-hs-test/675375/42 "2013-12-04T06:06:57Z")

</div>

> [@Terr](#):
>
> A couple of years ago this problem was given as homework to my neighbor’s kid who was in 5th grade:
> 
> In the following formula, each letter stands for a digit(same letter - same digit):
> 
> FOUR + FIVE = NINE
> 
> What digit does F stand for?
> 
> I was surprised they gave this in fifth grade. Now this is a non-trivial problem. It can be solved either the long way - by finding what each letter represents, or the short way - by short-circuiting just for F. The long way, IIRC, took me something like five minutes.

> [@Terr](#):
>
> A couple of years ago this problem was given as homework to my neighbor’s kid who was in 5th grade:
> 
> In the following formula, each letter stands for a digit(same letter - same digit):
> 
> FOUR + FIVE = NINE
> 
> What digit does F stand for?
> 
> I was surprised they gave this in fifth grade. Now this is a non-trivial problem. It can be solved either the long way - by finding what each letter represents, or the short way - by short-circuiting just for F. The long way, IIRC, took me something like five minutes.

I think the hardest part is framing the problem in terms of the rules of addition, once I tried to solve the problem by reducing it to:

F\*10^3 + O \* 10^2 + U 10 + R + (etc) = (F+F)\*10^3 + (O+I)\*10^2 + (etc)

It’s really messy, because while that way of representing it works, the trick is more about reasoning about the circumstances under which numbers can carry (meaning, under which circumstances (O+I)\*10^2 can be expanded to (O+I - n) \* 10^2 + 1 \* 10^3) than it is about solving anything. There are a lot of “hidden constraints”.

> [@Terr](#):
>
> AFAIK and figured out, there was only one answer: 2. What is the second one?

First let’s get out of the way the case where letters aren’t unique, in which case the trivial case is

0000 + 0000 = 0000  
or  
1010 + 1010 = 2020

And similar nonsense up to F=4

Assuming they ARE unique,

R + E = E implies R is 0. This means that the carry into U+V is 0

U+V = N

O+I = I on first glance appears to imply that O = 0, and we’re stuck due to uniqueness, but that’s not necessarily true. If U+V carries, then all that is required is that (O+I) = 10+(I-1) = 9+I =\> O = 9.

This means that, if U+V carries, O+I carries. Which means that 2\*F+1 = N

Edit: It should be noted that since O can’t be 0, at this point we know U+V must carry.

So now we have

F9U0 + FIVE = NINE

What values can F be? Well, we know that 2F+1 \< 10, so F \<= 4. But 8+1 = 9 = N, and O=9, since we’re maintaining uniqueness (N =/= O) we know that F \<= 3.

Now we need a consistency check to narrow down F.

So we know that 2F + 1 = N and U+V-10 = N (remember that U+V must carry, hence U+V-10)

Let’s say F is 3, then N is 7. What combinations of U+V-10 = 7? The only one is 8+9 or 9+8, which is impossible, since O is 9.

So F is 2, then N is 5. Thus U+V can be 9+6 (again, impossible), or 7+8 (possible).

If F is 1, then N is 3. U+V is 9+4 (impossible), 8+5 (possible), or 7+6 (possible).

So we get:  
29{7,8}0 + 2I{8,7}E = 5I5E  
or  
19{8,5,7,6}0 + 1I{5,8,6,7}E = 3I3E

I and E can be freely chosen from whatever remains after making your valid choice of U and V.

So F can be 1 or 2.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Terr](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/839c29/32.png) [@Terr](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Terr)\
**Post date:** [December 4, 2013, 6:16am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sample-math-problem-from-oecd-international-hs-test/675375/43 "2013-12-04T06:16:59Z")

</div>

Ulf and Jragon - nice. So far everyone I presented it to, including myself (granted, it was a pretty small sample - maybe 10 people) just did 2 and no one got to 1.

But anyway - this was done in homework in 5th grade. I would say solving this is way more difficult than the OPs high school exam question. I know one is geometry and the other kinda algebra, but still.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bengangmo](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/50afbb/32.png) [@bengangmo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bengangmo)\
**Post date:** [December 4, 2013, 6:38am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sample-math-problem-from-oecd-international-hs-test/675375/44 "2013-12-04T06:38:39Z")

</div>

> [@Robot\_Arm](#):
>
> Piece of cake, but then there’s this gem in the description of allowable answers:Pi = 3 is considered a correct answer! What the fuck?

They had an article on this in today’s paper here (Singapore) -

they made the point that the test is supposed to test reasoning skills more than rote regurgitation.

If true - it seems appropriate to me to accept Pi=3 as a possible solution so long as the student was explicit in setting that at the outset.

For me - I intuitively thought that the total opening area must be 1/3 of the circumference - so half of 1/3 as 1/6 I would have guessed - then thought “Nah, it can’t be that easy”

My just finished primary three (3rd grade? She’s 9)

For math they learn the “model method”. Naturally, to help he with homework I must also learn it. Must say - it is very very powerful. Using this, she can solve the types of problems I recall from age around 12 or 13 or so.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![psychobunny](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/54ee81/32.png) [@psychobunny](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/psychobunny)\
**Post date:** [December 4, 2013, 7:50am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sample-math-problem-from-oecd-international-hs-test/675375/45 "2013-12-04T07:50:56Z")

</div>

OK, the way I did the latter one:

[spoiler]was to determine that the R had to be zero so O had to be a nine so that if the U and V added up to more than 10 the second column would work. Therefore F has to be less than 4 or less. Since U=V = N+10, and the 9 is taken, the N has to be either 3 or 5, so F has to be either one or two. The answer I got was

## 1960 1572

3532[/spoiler]  
I just wondered if there was an actual formula you could use.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Robot\_Arm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/robot_arm/32/18280_2.png) [@Robot\_Arm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Robot_Arm)\
**Post date:** [December 4, 2013, 10:18am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sample-math-problem-from-oecd-international-hs-test/675375/46 "2013-12-04T10:18:09Z")

</div>

> [@bengangmo](#):
>
> They had an article on this in today’s paper here (Singapore) -
> 
> they made the point that the test is supposed to test reasoning skills more than rote regurgitation.
> 
> If true - it seems appropriate to me to accept Pi=3 as a possible solution so long as the student was explicit in setting that at the outset.

The idea is to understand what you’re doing, rather than to get the right answer?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bengangmo](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/50afbb/32.png) [@bengangmo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bengangmo)\
**Post date:** [December 4, 2013, 11:19am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sample-math-problem-from-oecd-international-hs-test/675375/47 "2013-12-04T11:19:59Z")

</div>

That’s what I took from the article. Rather explicitly - they said the test was to test knowledge application and reasoning ability.

To my mind, if you have got the reasoning part correct, but set Pi as 3 instead of 3.14 then so what. Putting in the “right” value of Pi is pretty damn easy and doesn’t test much of anything. Understanding how to reason and arrive at the answer is much more important - is that bad?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jragon](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/e19b73/32.png) [@Jragon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jragon)\
**Post date:** [December 4, 2013, 11:40am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sample-math-problem-from-oecd-international-hs-test/675375/48 "2013-12-04T11:40:14Z")

</div>

Is setting Pi to 3 really that much less correct than setting it to 3.1 or 3.14 or 3.141? I mean, yeah, you lose precision, but it’s a bit silly to get worked up about it. If we wanted a numerically perfect answer we’d ask for it in **terms of** pi. If we needed an actual calculation for real world purposes that really needed that precision, we’d probably be using a calculator or somesuch with a much more precise value.

For a problem more about conceptualization than calculation, 3 is plenty sufficient.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Haunted\_Pasta](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/94ad74/32.png) [@Haunted\_Pasta](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Haunted_Pasta)\
**Post date:** [December 4, 2013, 3:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sample-math-problem-from-oecd-international-hs-test/675375/49 "2013-12-04T15:15:32Z")

</div>

I wouldn’t feel like a good Doper if I didn’t pedantically point out that the first picture in the diagram is incorrect. The feature it shows as being 200 centimeters is the outside diameter, when according to the problem it should be the inside diameter.

I feel I should win _at least_ a ham sandwich for this stunning and revelatory observation.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Robot\_Arm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/robot_arm/32/18280_2.png) [@Robot\_Arm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Robot_Arm)\
**Post date:** [December 4, 2013, 3:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sample-math-problem-from-oecd-international-hs-test/675375/50 "2013-12-04T15:35:45Z")

</div>

> [@bengangmo](#):
>
> That’s what I took from the article. Rather explicitly - they said the test was to test knowledge application and reasoning ability.
> 
> To my mind, if you have got the reasoning part correct, but set Pi as 3 instead of 3.14 then so what. Putting in the “right” value of Pi is pretty damn easy and doesn’t test much of anything. Understanding how to reason and arrive at the answer is much more important - is that bad?

I think that knowing the value of pi is about more than memorization, though. It is emphatically _not_ 3; it’s not even rational. That’s an exercise in spatial awareness and reasoning skills, too; and it’s something they should know about circles before they start trying to build revolving doors. Just two decimal places would be fine.

And I was quoting Tom Lehrer.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/left_hand_of_dorkness/32/7156_2.png) [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Left_Hand_of_Dorkness)\
**Post date:** [December 4, 2013, 5:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sample-math-problem-from-oecd-international-hs-test/675375/51 "2013-12-04T17:05:21Z")

</div>

> [@Robot\_Arm](#):
>
> And I was quoting Tom Lehrer.

I get it.

You can’t take three from pi, three is **less** than pi, so you look at the one in the tenths place. Now, that’s really one tenth, so you change the tenth to .1, and there’s four in the hundredths place…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/left_hand_of_dorkness/32/7156_2.png) [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Left_Hand_of_Dorkness)\
**Post date:** [December 4, 2013, 5:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sample-math-problem-from-oecd-international-hs-test/675375/52 "2013-12-04T17:14:14Z")

</div>

> [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](#):
>
> You can’t take three from pi

:smack: PI FROM THREE! PI FROM THREE!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ulf\_the\_Unwashed](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/b4bc9f/32.png) [@Ulf\_the\_Unwashed](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ulf_the_Unwashed)\
**Post date:** [December 4, 2013, 5:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sample-math-problem-from-oecd-international-hs-test/675375/53 "2013-12-04T17:28:42Z")

</div>

> [@Jragon](#):
>
> Is setting Pi to 3 really that much less correct than setting it to 3.1 or 3.14 or 3.141? I mean, yeah, you lose precision, but it’s a bit silly to get worked up about it. If we wanted a numerically perfect answer we’d ask for it in **terms of** pi. If we needed an actual calculation for real world purposes that really needed that precision, we’d probably be using a calculator or somesuch with a much more precise value.
> 
> For a problem more about conceptualization than calculation, 3 is plenty sufficient.

One issue that I have with the problem as constituted is that it sets up rather arbitrary standards for what is a correct answer and doesn’t communicate it to the solvers. The moment you allow an approximation, you open a potentially thorny can of worms, to mix a couple of metaphors. Solvers should know what level of accuracy they’re expected to adhere to. I would never draw any significant conclusions from one problem, but I would be REALLY reluctant to take anything away from a problem where the guidelines aren’t made clear to the solvers.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Thudlow\_Boink](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/thudlow_boink/32/320_2.png) [@Thudlow\_Boink](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Thudlow_Boink)\
**Post date:** [December 4, 2013, 5:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sample-math-problem-from-oecd-international-hs-test/675375/54 "2013-12-04T17:31:49Z")

</div>

> [@Jragon](#):
>
> Is setting Pi to 3 really that much less correct than setting it to 3.1 or 3.14 or 3.141? I mean, yeah, you lose precision, but it’s a bit silly to get worked up about it. If we wanted a numerically perfect answer we’d ask for it in **terms of** pi. If we needed an actual calculation for real world purposes that really needed that precision, we’d probably be using a calculator or somesuch with a much more precise value.

When I first read the OP’s link, I mentally solved the problem and “gave” my answer as 200pi/6 or 100pi/3. That is, I did give it in terms of pi, because the problem asked for the maximum arc length, not _a numerical approximation to the maximum arc length_.

In an idealized situation, _any_ answer other than this one is only an approximation. In a real-world situation, _any answer at all_ is an approximation, because we can’t say that the diameter is 200 cm with infinite precision, or that the shape is a perfect circle.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![silenus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/silenus/32/166_2.png) [@silenus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/silenus)\
**Post date:** [December 4, 2013, 5:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sample-math-problem-from-oecd-international-hs-test/675375/55 "2013-12-04T17:35:07Z")

</div>

It just took my senior Government class less than 5 seconds to solve it. They simplified pi to 3 to do it, but it still took less time for them to solve it than it did me to explain it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Skammer](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/skammer/32/143_2.png) [@Skammer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Skammer)\
**Post date:** [December 4, 2013, 5:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sample-math-problem-from-oecd-international-hs-test/675375/56 "2013-12-04T17:59:41Z")

</div>

I had the answer expressed as a product of pi in about 10 seconds. It took slightly me longer to multiply an irrational number by a repeating decimal…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Inner\_Stickler](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/inner_stickler/32/318_2.png) [@Inner\_Stickler](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Inner_Stickler)\
**Post date:** [December 4, 2013, 6:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sample-math-problem-from-oecd-international-hs-test/675375/57 "2013-12-04T18:04:25Z")

</div>

> [@Haunted\_Pasta](#):
>
> I wouldn’t feel like a good Doper if I didn’t pedantically point out that the first picture in the diagram is incorrect. The feature it shows as being 200 centimeters is the outside diameter, when according to the problem it should be the inside diameter.

The dashed line disappears into the outline of the circle. Were it to measure the outside diameter, I would expect it to look like a tangent with the dashes visible along the length of the line. That being said, I took a straight edge and held it against the line and while it covered up a portion of the outline, it did not line up with the inner circle, either. So they’re measuring neither the inner nor the outer diameter but an unspecified center diameter.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shalmanese](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/45deac/32.png) [@Shalmanese](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shalmanese)\
**Post date:** [December 4, 2013, 7:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sample-math-problem-from-oecd-international-hs-test/675375/58 "2013-12-04T19:00:19Z")

</div>

To get an idea of why this might be considered hard, watch a group of eight grade kids try to solve the problem:

> [@](#):
>
> There are 125 sheep and 5 dogs in a flock. How old is the shepherd?”

[video here](http://robertkaplinsky.com/how-old-is-the-shepherd/)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Haunted\_Pasta](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/94ad74/32.png) [@Haunted\_Pasta](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Haunted_Pasta)\
**Post date:** [December 4, 2013, 7:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sample-math-problem-from-oecd-international-hs-test/675375/59 "2013-12-04T19:34:44Z")

</div>

> [@Inner\_Stickler](#):
>
> The dashed line disappears into the outline of the circle. Were it to measure the outside diameter, I would expect it to look like a tangent with the dashes visible along the length of the line. That being said, I took a straight edge and held it against the line and while it covered up a portion of the outline, it did not line up with the inner circle, either. So they’re measuring neither the inner nor the outer diameter but an unspecified center diameter.

You chose your user name in anticipation of this exact moment, didn’t you?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Inner\_Stickler](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/inner_stickler/32/318_2.png) [@Inner\_Stickler](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Inner_Stickler)\
**Post date:** [December 4, 2013, 7:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sample-math-problem-from-oecd-international-hs-test/675375/60 "2013-12-04T19:39:12Z")

</div>

I just really want a ham sandwich.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sample-math-problem-from-oecd-international-hs-test/675375.md?page=2)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sample-math-problem-from-oecd-international-hs-test/675375.md?page=4)
