# Save PBS!

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/save-pbs/572421>\
**Category:** Cafe Society\
**Created:** [February 24, 2011, 3:36am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/save-pbs/572421 "2011-02-24T03:36:17Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FoieGrasIsEvil](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/foiegrasisevil/32/16638_2.png) [@FoieGrasIsEvil](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/FoieGrasIsEvil)\
**Post date:** [February 24, 2011, 6:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/save-pbs/572421/21 "2011-02-24T18:30:33Z")

</div>

> [@PunditLisa](#):
>
> I’ve always wondered why, if PBS receives millions of dollars in taxpayer subsidies per year, presumably to create educational programs, how they can then go and charge the local stations a fee to air that same program? Seems a bit like double dipping to me.

I’ve always wondered why, if PBS receives millions of dollars in taxpayer subsidies per year, presumably to create an atmosphere conducive to winning football games, how they can go and charge the local stations a fee to air that program? Or black it out at will?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Grey](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/b782af/32.png) [@Grey](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Grey)\
**Post date:** [February 24, 2011, 6:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/save-pbs/572421/22 "2011-02-24T18:45:22Z")

</div>

> [@Mr.Moto](#):
>
> I think we can agree that the American public, left right and center, would be distrustful of broadcast networks that were initiated by the government.

Well +22 years of public broadcasting and the nefarious impact is what exactly? Maybe it’s an American thing but I would have used cautious instead of distrustful. Fantastic resource that could be abused but, as far as I’ve ever seen or heard, hasn’t to any noticable degree.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Rattlehead02](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/rattlehead02/32/3944_2.png) [@Rattlehead02](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Rattlehead02)\
**Post date:** [February 24, 2011, 6:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/save-pbs/572421/23 "2011-02-24T18:49:57Z")

</div>

> [@FoieGrasIsEvil](#):
>
> I’ve always wondered why, if PBS receives millions of dollars in taxpayer subsidies per year, presumably to create an atmosphere conducive to winning football games, how they can go and charge the local stations a fee to air that program? Or black it out at will?

Well, to be fair no one should have to sit through the awfulness that is typically found in PBS in the first place 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![flickster](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/7bcc69/32.png) [@flickster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/flickster)\
**Post date:** [February 24, 2011, 7:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/save-pbs/572421/24 "2011-02-24T19:29:19Z")

</div>

> [@1step4word](#):
>
> Sorry in a time of great finanical deficits and hundreds of choices television I don’t see a need for tax money going to support PBS or NPR . They have some quality programing they should be able to compete without the gov’t handouts.

This x 2

Back in the day when there were only the 2-3 other networks, I would probably have thought otherwise. However in today’s world of 100s of networks - they need to be able to survive on their own. I’m sure there would be lines of sponsors wanting to pay for advertising on much of their programming. They don’t need Uncle Sugar to survive on the open market.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![johnpost](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/f17d59/32.png) [@johnpost](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/johnpost)\
**Post date:** [February 24, 2011, 8:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/save-pbs/572421/25 "2011-02-24T20:24:10Z")

</div>

> [@1step4word](#):
>
> Sorry in a time of great finanical deficits and hundreds of choices television I don’t see a need for tax money going to support PBS or NPR . They have some quality programing they should be able to compete without the gov’t handouts.

> [@flickster](#):
>
> This x 2
> 
> Back in the day when there were only the 2-3 other networks, I would probably have thought otherwise. However in today’s world of 100s of networks - they need to be able to survive on their own. I’m sure there would be lines of sponsors wanting to pay for advertising on much of their programming. They don’t need Uncle Sugar to survive on the open market.

there are people for whom cable is not available. even if available it might not be affordable. on other boards there is a lot of discussion where people have dropped cable because of not being able to afford it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![shiftless](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/e9c0ed/32.png) [@shiftless](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/shiftless)\
**Post date:** [February 24, 2011, 8:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/save-pbs/572421/26 "2011-02-24T20:45:15Z")

</div>

When I was young there were only 5 channels available and PBS was the only place to see nekked boobs on TV(Benny Hill). The need for PBS to recieve tax dollars is long, long past. If you think it’s a really important channel, send them some money. I know I send money to HBO every month.

Sure, PBS puts on some goods stuff sometimes but that doesn’t excuse “Are You Being Served” and similar. I can’t imagine why our taxes should be spent delivering cheaply made British sitcoms to the masses, unless it’s someone’s idea that even crappy British TV is somehow more uplifting than regular old American TV.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fear\_Itself](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/fear_itself/32/19637_2.png) [@Fear\_Itself](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Fear_Itself)\
**Post date:** [February 24, 2011, 8:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/save-pbs/572421/27 "2011-02-24T20:52:04Z")

</div>

> [@Sam\_A.Robrin](#):
>
> Government loves to create problems for which it can offer itself as the solution…

Uh huh… Is that just common knowledge, or is it chiselled in stone somewhere?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Drunky\_Smurf](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/drunky_smurf/32/449_2.png) [@Drunky\_Smurf](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Drunky_Smurf)\
**Post date:** [February 24, 2011, 9:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/save-pbs/572421/28 "2011-02-24T21:39:15Z")

</div>

PBS sucks\* and needs to let out to pasture to survive or die on it’s own.

\*Except Rick Steves travel shows. The government needs to give him 20 billion dollars and his own tv station.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![johnpost](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/f17d59/32.png) [@johnpost](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/johnpost)\
**Post date:** [February 24, 2011, 10:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/save-pbs/572421/29 "2011-02-24T22:05:59Z")

</div>

PBS and NPR are some of the least expensive educational resources this nation has. The USA is getting dumber and dropping in its position in the world. I think they are needed more than ever.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_Tao\_s\_Revenge](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/73ab20/32.png) [@The\_Tao\_s\_Revenge](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Tao_s_Revenge)\
**Post date:** [February 24, 2011, 10:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/save-pbs/572421/30 "2011-02-24T22:25:14Z")

</div>

> [@flickster](#):
>
> This x 2
> 
> Back in the day when there were only the 2-3 other networks, I would probably have thought otherwise. However in today’s world of 100s of networks - they need to be able to survive on their own. I’m sure there would be lines of sponsors wanting to pay for advertising on much of their programming. They don’t need Uncle Sugar to survive on the open market.

Yes commercialism. That totally won’t reduce PBS to the lowest common denominator.

I’ve had satellite and I can’t think of one program on it’s 150+ channels that had the same impact as [Lafayette: The Lost Hero](http://www.pbs.org/lafayette/).

The guy was George Washington’s right hand man, a brave, daring, soldier and tactician ,and a fervent American patriot to the ideals of the revolution. He fought tenaciously for American freedom. He knew the importance of liberty for all, and that it meant freeing the slaves. He lived an interesting life born of French aristocracy, and was very helpful getting French aid during the American Revolution. When he went back to France, trying to keep the peace he got caught up in the middle of the French Revolution in a bad way and spent a good chunk of time imprisoned.

When he died he had arranged for American soil to be brought in for his French grave and the flags of both countries to be flown above it. His patriotism to both countries strong as ever.

The guy was 10 kinds of cool and for some reason commercial media never saw fit to mention him much, if it all.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dewey\_Finn](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dewey_finn/32/4222_2.png) [@Dewey\_Finn](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dewey_Finn)\
**Post date:** [February 24, 2011, 10:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/save-pbs/572421/31 "2011-02-24T22:57:14Z")

</div>

One thing I’ve noticed with PBS is that in some densely populated areas of the country there are multiple competing PBS stations. For example, where I grew up in Connecticut, we had WEDW (Connecticut Public Television) on Channel 49, WNET on Channel 13 out of Manhattan and WLIW on Channel 21 out of Long Island. Would it be less expensive to run public television if there were fewer overlapping affiliates? Would it be desirable to do so?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![johnpost](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/f17d59/32.png) [@johnpost](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/johnpost)\
**Post date:** [February 24, 2011, 11:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/save-pbs/572421/32 "2011-02-24T23:49:37Z")

</div>

> [@Dewey\_Finn](#):
>
> One thing I’ve noticed with PBS is that in some densely populated areas of the country there are multiple competing PBS stations. For example, where I grew up in Connecticut, we had WEDW (Connecticut Public Television) on Channel 49, WNET on Channel 13 out of Manhattan and WLIW on Channel 21 out of Long Island. Would it be less expensive to run public television if there were fewer overlapping affiliates? Would it be desirable to do so?

you might have had overlapping coverage. people on the other side of each of those three stations may have only had the one station. the FCC licenses stations in an attempt to give everyone coverage without stations interfering with each other.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Le\_Ministre\_de\_l\_au-dela](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/le_ministre_de_l_au-dela/32/12181_2.png) [@Le\_Ministre\_de\_l\_au-dela](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Le_Ministre_de_l_au-dela)\
**Post date:** [February 25, 2011, 12:45am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/save-pbs/572421/33 "2011-02-25T00:45:16Z")

</div>

For me, the fundamental question is - why have none of the commercial stations/networks that were devoted to intelligent programming survived? Does the need to derive revenue from advertising automatically cause [Network Decay](http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/NetworkDecay)?

I’m not sure it is possible for PBS/NPR to survive without the government funding, and, in my opinion, US society is better off for their existence.

One way or another, I still watch PBS and listen to NPR regularly after 35 years since I first encountered them. In that time, The Learning Channel, the History Channel, Discovery Channel, ScyFy, A&E have all morphed into pointless shit.

I’m a Canadian, so I can’t really influence US institutions like Congress. It would be a real shame if PBS/NPR were to disappear or to suffer demolition by neglect, though.

We have our own struggles with the CBC and its long, painful slide from robust to underfunded to who knows what?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![flickster](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/7bcc69/32.png) [@flickster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/flickster)\
**Post date:** [February 25, 2011, 3:39am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/save-pbs/572421/34 "2011-02-25T03:39:27Z")

</div>

> [@johnpost](#):
>
> there are people for whom cable is not available. even if available it might not be affordable. on other boards there is a lot of discussion where people have dropped cable because of not being able to afford it.

That doesn’t mean it’s the tax payer’s responsibility to subsidize your viewing pleasure. Where I grew up we could only receive an occasional snow storm quality image of PBS. If it’s that important to you, you’ll figure out a way.

> [@The Tao's Revenge](#):
>
> Yes commercialism. That totally won’t reduce PBS to the lowest common denominator.

Pfft, like dependence on Government funding has no effect :rolleyes:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FoieGrasIsEvil](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/foiegrasisevil/32/16638_2.png) [@FoieGrasIsEvil](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/FoieGrasIsEvil)\
**Post date:** [February 25, 2011, 4:28am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/save-pbs/572421/35 "2011-02-25T04:28:31Z")

</div>

> [@GildedLily](#):
>
> Well, to be fair no one should have to sit through the awfulness that is typically found in PBS in the first place 🙂

Of course not. Tounge planted firmly in cheek for \*\*PunditLisa \*\*as she lives 'round these parts…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![PunditLisa](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/4af34b/32.png) [@PunditLisa](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/PunditLisa)\
**Post date:** [February 25, 2011, 2:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/save-pbs/572421/36 "2011-02-25T14:08:29Z")

</div>

> [@FoieGrasIsEvil](#):
>
> I’ve always wondered why, if PBS receives millions of dollars in taxpayer subsidies per year, presumably to create an atmosphere conducive to winning football games, how they can go and charge the local stations a fee to air that program? Or black it out at will?

Luckily I’m 100 feet from Hamilton County, so I’m personally spared the PBS taxes. But there’s no doubt that the Hamilton Co taxpayers are getting hosed!

I’m glad they black out local games that don’t sell out, though. Because eventually the other owners are going to start balking about the unfairness of a profit-sharing arrangement when one team doesn’t bring any profits to the table!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_Tao\_s\_Revenge](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/73ab20/32.png) [@The\_Tao\_s\_Revenge](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Tao_s_Revenge)\
**Post date:** [February 25, 2011, 3:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/save-pbs/572421/37 "2011-02-25T15:08:45Z")

</div>

> [@flickster](#):
>
> That doesn’t mean it’s the tax payer’s responsibility to subsidize your viewing pleasure. Where I grew up we could only receive an occasional snow storm quality image of PBS. If it’s that important to you, you’ll figure out a way.

Yea we’ll write our representatives. It’s a public good that’s too important to risk.

> [@](#):
>
> Pfft, like dependence on Government funding has no effect :rolleyes:

I love that. Completely reduce my post to one line so you can dismiss it with a one liner. I give an example and you edit it out so you can give a sound byte. If you’re an example of commercialized media success, you clearly, and desperately needed some PBS growing up.

I’ll take your lack of counter example as clear proof you have no counter example to shows like Lafayette: The Lost Hero.  
Nor have I seen continuing long lasting series of the quality of the PBS series [American Experience](http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/) on commercialized television.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![flickster](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/7bcc69/32.png) [@flickster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/flickster)\
**Post date:** [February 25, 2011, 3:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/save-pbs/572421/38 "2011-02-25T15:52:23Z")

</div>

> [@The\_Tao\_s\_Revenge](#):
>
> Yea we’ll write our representatives. It’s a public good that’s too important to risk.
> 
> I love that. Completely reduce my post to one line so you can dismiss it with a one liner. I give an example and you edit it out so you can give a sound byte. If you’re an example of commercialized media success, you clearly, and desperately needed some PBS growing up.
> 
> I’ll take your lack of counter example as clear proof you have no counter example to shows like Lafayette: The Lost Hero.  
> Nor have I seen continuing long lasting series of the quality of the PBS series [American Experience](http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/) on commercialized television.

Quality entertainment that CAN survive with commercial sponsorship instead of taxpayer funding

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![johnpost](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/f17d59/32.png) [@johnpost](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/johnpost)\
**Post date:** [February 25, 2011, 4:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/save-pbs/572421/39 "2011-02-25T16:04:14Z")

</div>

> [@flickster](#):
>
> … However in today’s world of 100s of networks - they need to be able to survive on their own. .

> [@johnpost](#):
>
> there are people for whom cable is not available. even if available it might not be affordable. on other boards there is a lot of discussion where people have dropped cable because of not being able to afford it.

> [@flickster](#):
>
> That doesn’t mean it’s the tax payer’s responsibility to subsidize your viewing pleasure. Where I grew up we could only receive an occasional snow storm quality image of PBS. If it’s that important to you, you’ll figure out a way.

i don’t think it’s the tax payer’s responsibility to subsidize the air travel system for people’s travel convenience. people should use the rail and highway system which are already tax payer subsidized.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FoieGrasIsEvil](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/foiegrasisevil/32/16638_2.png) [@FoieGrasIsEvil](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/FoieGrasIsEvil)\
**Post date:** [February 25, 2011, 4:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/save-pbs/572421/40 "2011-02-25T16:08:38Z")

</div>

> [@PunditLisa](#):
>
> Luckily I’m 100 feet from Hamilton County, so I’m personally spared the PBS taxes. But there’s no doubt that the Hamilton Co taxpayers are getting hosed!
> 
> I’m glad they black out local games that don’t sell out, though. Because eventually the other owners are going to start balking about the unfairness of a profit-sharing arrangement when one team doesn’t bring any profits to the table!

Yeah, plus (being the rabid fan I am regardless of how bad the team may be at any given moment) there’s mysterious internet ways to watch the blacked out games anyhow if I can’t manage to get to a game in person. And I live in Hidden Valley in Indiana, so…I’m with you on dodging the tax burden of Hamilton County. I do my part though…spent a lot of money on the Brown family over the years.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/save-pbs/572421.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/save-pbs/572421.md?page=3)
