Saving the world step 1...

From Discovery.com

And from Eruption of Thera

Speculation about the energy in the K-T asteroid

A frightening scale of earthquake power

Also, Tambora which erupted in 1815 is said to have had a power of about 20,000 megatons.

Isn’t it sometimes worth remembering that whether you like it or not, Jesus directly or indirectly influenced the actions of billions of people of over the last two-thousand years, and probably will remain a large influence for the next odd-thousand? I did not claim that Jesus “saved the world” nor did I claim that Christianity is, was, or will be the largest religion. Reread my post. Then read it again. Keep doing this until you comprehend.

I said that Jesus had an influence of a greater magnitude than WWII. WWII influenced, at most, 6.5 billion people so far. WWII likely will not be a major influence within 200 years, and possibly won’t be well remembered within 1000, and probably will be nearly forgotten within 2000. WWII involved millions of participants. Jesus was one man who had and has influence is magnitudes greater than WWII does, did, or will. How can you argue that point? Don’t give me any smug athiest or alternate religion BS either, your belief or non belief in Him is not at question and is not a factor. His influence is the sole focus of this discussion, and it cannot be rationally argued that WWII was greater than Him in this respect.

Thank you and good fucking day.

–Tim

For want of a nail…the rider was lost

For all we know it could have been that Dutch kid with his finger in the dike! :cool:

[Tony Montana]
Ju stick ju finger in a dyke? What de fuck dis guy talking about?
[/Tony Montana]
:smiley:

Once again my OP has been lost in the statistical crap and scientific/religious argument of those who love to get technical and use lots of numbers to prove their point. I have absolutely no interest in religion in the realms of this argument. There was never any poignant moment in time in which Jesus saved the entire human race. He may well be our saviour now and continue to influence the lives of millions of people and in some form ‘save’ us but I DON’T GIVE A TOSS!!

We have two questions that have arisen because of the OP:

  1. Do we actually have the fire power to destroy the earth, or at least wipe out human existence?
  2. If yes, has anyone ever actually ‘saved’ the earth or human existence because of such a threat.

I am now reasonably confident that my question has been answered, if anything, for lack of responses and the answer is ‘no, there is no one human that has saved the earth’ unless someone is holding out on us and can produce a valid story of such an occurrence. Can we also assume now that there has never been any real situation in which the entire earth was at threat and therefore no one has really had the ‘chance’ to save the earth.

The only thing that I can really see is that even if the earth were under threat do we actually think ‘they’ are going to tell us? There may well be men or women who have saved the world (or at least some of it) but we’ll never know.

jackas, are you trying to be insulting to people who tried to answer your OP? Because your post sure reads that way.

Maybe your OP was asking a question that had an obvious answer to most people who study history, so they were trying to find anything close that could be a substitute or in some way help you to find an answer? No, there are no Bruce Willis’s or Harrison Fords that have saved the Earth singlehandedly, as an “action hero” like you say in your OP.

Also, as to your additional questions - these statements of yours seem to conflict with each other, don’t you think?

You want someone to show that we have or do not have the firepower to destroy the Earth, but also complain about those people who “get technical” about it? I guess you better ignore my post about volcanoes and earthquakes and their relative power then…

Why not tone it down a little in GQ, if people are at least making the effort to answer your question, OK?

Well, I don’t really have an answer to the OP (though if I was a little more literal in my interpretations of the bible, I would think that Noah fits the criteria, as curwin mentioned)

Anyway, I just wanted to post a link to Cecil’s column, where he discusses nuclear close calls on the U.S.’ side.

OK people, it can be inferred that the OP is asking for REAL people here, and not fictional characters. So for those of you bringing up Jesus and Noah, please stop joking around! By the way, I know that there was a real Jesus but since so little is actually known about him, I doubt that we can include him in this discussion. I mean, if we’re going to include all characters including fictional ones, I’d like to throw in Prometheous, Ra, and let’s not forget Superman!

Okay, then to answer the Original Post:

No, there has almost certainly never been any situation where one man or woman has “saved” either the Earth in it’s entirety, a large portion of it, or a significant portion of it’s inhabitants.

My reasoning:

There has never been any force capable of such destruction, under the control of any one individual.

I agree with those who say- and state with cites- that all our nuclear weapons are really but a pittance to an entire planet weighing some five hundred billion sextillion tons. (Or thereabouts. :smiley: )

And in any case, all the nukes are not, cannot and will not be under the control of any one person. They’re not even under the control of any one government for Pete’s sake!

In answer to others’ postings, yes, there have been figures, both mythical and actual, that have influenced large numbers of people worldwide (Jesus, Mohammed, Zeus) and even those figures who have almost singlehandedly caused massive decimation of both people and property (Hitler, Stalin, the Caesars) few, if any, have “saved” (meaning a physical salvation from death or injury, not a spiritual ‘saving’) like numbers.

With the possible exceptions of the aforementioned early-warning radar operators… who, it could be argued, may have come closer to accidentally setting off such a catastrophe, rather than averting it.