# Saying "fuck you" to another poster gets only a mod note?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/saying-fuck-you-to-another-poster-gets-only-a-mod-note/831072>\
**Category:** About This Message Board\
**Created:** [March 13, 2019, 3:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/saying-fuck-you-to-another-poster-gets-only-a-mod-note/831072 "2019-03-13T15:04:16Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 18\
**Page:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MrDibble](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mrdibble/32/114_2.png) [@MrDibble](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MrDibble)\
**Post date:** [March 15, 2019, 5:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/saying-fuck-you-to-another-poster-gets-only-a-mod-note/831072/61 "2019-03-15T17:35:18Z")

</div>

> [@Colibri](#):
>
> Thank you for once again confirming that the poster in question didn’t say what you claimed he said.

I didn’t claim “he said” it.

> [@](#):
>
> Rather, as you’ve explained here, you were responding to what you _imagined_ he meant.

No, “imagined” implies it was not a good inference from his actual words. I responded to the clearest literal interpretation. Interpretation is not imagination.

> [@](#):
>
> If you have to explain your reasoning, then the meaning of the post you were responding to clearly wasn’t explicit.

Not explicit =/= different meaning.

> [@](#):
>
> That in itself would have been good reason not to cut you any slack on the response.

Like I said before, that’s your privilege.

> [@](#):
>
> As mentioned above, moderators take into account a poster’s history in deciding on a response.

…but Gods forbid us posters get uppity and do _exactly the same thing_…:rolleyes:

> [@](#):
>
> When you have a history of animosity with a particular poster, you’re not going to get much allowance on insults.

I didn’t have a particular “history of animosity” with that poster. Before that post, obviously. But I was quite familiar with his stances on things.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MrDibble](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mrdibble/32/114_2.png) [@MrDibble](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MrDibble)\
**Post date:** [March 15, 2019, 5:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/saying-fuck-you-to-another-poster-gets-only-a-mod-note/831072/62 "2019-03-15T17:37:02Z")

</div>

> [@Colibri](#):
>
> And as he admits, his response was based on personal animosity.

\*Now \*who’s putting words in whose mouth?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MrDibble](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mrdibble/32/114_2.png) [@MrDibble](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MrDibble)\
**Post date:** [March 15, 2019, 5:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/saying-fuck-you-to-another-poster-gets-only-a-mod-note/831072/63 "2019-03-15T17:40:46Z")

</div>

> [@Slash1972](#):
>
> Seems pretty consistent that a poster is going to get at least a Mod Note for telling another poster “Fuck You” in some forums. So, don’t do that.

Naah - consistency would be making this one a warning.

I’m not arguing that my warning wasn’t valid. I said “Fuck you” to someone in IMHO, after all. Justified as it was, it was against the rules.

I \*am \*arguing that the reasoning given why \*this \*isn’t a warning is _post hoc_ bullshit.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iiandyiiii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/iiandyiiii/32/7924_2.png) [@iiandyiiii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iiandyiiii)\
**Post date:** [March 15, 2019, 5:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/saying-fuck-you-to-another-poster-gets-only-a-mod-note/831072/64 "2019-03-15T17:42:13Z")

</div>

> [@Colibri](#):
>
> In other words, the poster didn’t actually say what **Mr. Dibble** claimed he said. He put words in his mouth that weren’t in his post, and didn’t ask for an explanation. And as he admits, his response was based on personal animosity.

By your definition, you just put words in his mouth (he didn’t state is was “based on personal animosity”). It was an interpretation, which is necessary for much of communication. Just like your interpretation that he meant that his angry response was “based on personal animosity”.

It really is possible to interpret something in different ways, and that doesn’t necessarily mean putting words into someone else’s mouth.

(Cue for a long discussion about what it exactly means to “put words into someone’s mouth”)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Colibri](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/colibri/32/1841_2.png) [@Colibri](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Colibri)\
**Post date:** [March 15, 2019, 6:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/saying-fuck-you-to-another-poster-gets-only-a-mod-note/831072/65 "2019-03-15T18:07:26Z")

</div>

> [@iiandyiiii](#):
>
> By your definition, you just put words in his mouth (he didn’t state is was “based on personal animosity”).

Fine. That means you agree that he put words in the other poster’s mouth (to put words in your mouth).😉

> [@](#):
>
> It really is possible to interpret something in different ways, and that doesn’t necessarily mean putting words into someone else’s mouth.

But “interpreting it” means that the poster said something different than he actually said. So you agree that the poster’s literal comment was different from what was attributed to it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Leaffan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/leaffan/32/299_2.png) [@Leaffan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Leaffan)\
**Post date:** [March 15, 2019, 6:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/saying-fuck-you-to-another-poster-gets-only-a-mod-note/831072/66 "2019-03-15T18:10:34Z")

</div>

Hi. Well, I’m glad the conversation has shifted away from me now. 🙂

Listen, what I said was wrong and I admit it. Had I been given a warning I would have agreed to it, but a mod note was sufficient for me to take a step back and calm down.

The OP of that original thread, to which I replied, has a transgender step-son. I have a transgender daughter. The OP and I sometimes communicate via other media and as you can imagine some of this stuff regarding homophobia, etc. is quite real to us and downright hurtful to experience.

Mea culpa. I shan’t do it again and once again, I apologize. Thank you engineer\_comp\_geek for your patience and understanding.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mona\_Lisa\_Simpson](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/ce7236/32.png) [@Mona\_Lisa\_Simpson](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mona_Lisa_Simpson)\
**Post date:** [March 15, 2019, 6:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/saying-fuck-you-to-another-poster-gets-only-a-mod-note/831072/67 "2019-03-15T18:18:45Z")

</div>

And weirdly, just as I was about to post to this thread, as the OP of the thread that is in question, Leaffan posts. I disagree with Leaffan about many aspects of politics, 9Plus, he’s a Toronto Maple Leafs fan…I live in Vancouver…) but I respect him because he is upstanding in his human rights stances, immigration, rights for the transgendered, etc.

I was concerned when I saw Leaffan’s post I did not want him to go to SMDB jail, get warnings etc. I messaged him privately. I saw it was a Note, and I was confused but relieved.  
Anyway, carry on with your hijack.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Peter\_Morris](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/peter_morris/32/359_2.png) [@Peter\_Morris](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Peter_Morris)\
**Post date:** [March 15, 2019, 6:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/saying-fuck-you-to-another-poster-gets-only-a-mod-note/831072/68 "2019-03-15T18:19:23Z")

</div>

Statement quoted : ten more years of Apartheid would have been a good thing.

Statement actually made: the final ten years of Apartheid aren’t a good reason for disliking Reagan.  
Yeah, I see a huge distinction there. Bad boy for misquoting him.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iiandyiiii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/iiandyiiii/32/7924_2.png) [@iiandyiiii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iiandyiiii)\
**Post date:** [March 15, 2019, 6:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/saying-fuck-you-to-another-poster-gets-only-a-mod-note/831072/69 "2019-03-15T18:34:19Z")

</div>

> [@Colibri](#):
>
> But “interpreting it” means that the poster said something different than he actually said. So you agree that the poster’s literal comment was different from what was attributed to it.

Interpretation is about what was meant, not what was said. He said X – by saying X, I think it’s clear he meant Y.

But that’s not really the meat of why I challenged you – I challenged you because you said **MrDibble** made a false statement about that other poster. Unless you can read minds, you don’t know that either. You might think he interpreted it wrong, but you can’t know for sure (and neither can he). Since you’re a moderator, I think that’s an important distinction to make.

Also, I wanted to make it clear that **MrDibble** isn’t the only one who interpreted those words as he did. Reasonable people can disagree on such things, and IMO reasonable people are disagreeing in this case.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BigT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bigt/32/12044_2.png) [@BigT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BigT)\
**Post date:** [March 15, 2019, 7:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/saying-fuck-you-to-another-poster-gets-only-a-mod-note/831072/70 "2019-03-15T19:47:29Z")

</div>

> [@Colibri](#):
>
> Thank you for once again confirming that the poster in question didn’t say what you claimed he said. Rather, as you’ve explained here, you were responding to what you _imagined_ he meant. If you have to explain your reasoning, then the meaning of the post you were responding to clearly wasn’t explicit.

That’s a bad argument. Explaining something simply means that you don’t think the person you are explaining it to understands. It’s extremely common that what is obvious to one person is not obvious to another. I’ve had to explain post that were obvious to me several times.

**MrDibble** is the closest thing on this board we have to an expert on Apartheid, as far as I know. He lives in the area where it happened, and is himself black. He is also well educated, and is an online activist, and thus experiences the tactics of the other side a lot.

It’s entirely expected that he would notice something that you guys wouldn’t related to the subject, and then have to try and explain what is obvious to him.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MrDibble](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mrdibble/32/114_2.png) [@MrDibble](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MrDibble)\
**Post date:** [March 15, 2019, 9:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/saying-fuck-you-to-another-poster-gets-only-a-mod-note/831072/71 "2019-03-15T21:01:13Z")

</div>

I’m not Black. I’m Coloured.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Biffster](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/biffster/32/339_2.png) [@Biffster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Biffster)\
**Post date:** [March 16, 2019, 12:02am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/saying-fuck-you-to-another-poster-gets-only-a-mod-note/831072/72 "2019-03-16T00:02:55Z")

</div>

> [@MrDibble](#):
>
> I’m not Black. I’m Coloured.

Me too. I’m sort of a beigy-pink.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kayaker](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kayaker/32/441_2.png) [@kayaker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kayaker)\
**Post date:** [March 16, 2019, 2:17am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/saying-fuck-you-to-another-poster-gets-only-a-mod-note/831072/73 "2019-03-16T02:17:26Z")

</div>

> [@MrDibble](#):
>
> I’m not Black. I’m Coloured.

You’ve just _got_ to use the “u”, don’t you?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MrDibble](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mrdibble/32/114_2.png) [@MrDibble](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MrDibble)\
**Post date:** [March 16, 2019, 6:24am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/saying-fuck-you-to-another-poster-gets-only-a-mod-note/831072/74 "2019-03-16T06:24:57Z")

</div>

> [@kayaker](#):
>
> You’ve just _got_ to use the “u”, don’t you?

It’s a [proper name](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coloureds)for the ethnicity, it’d be wrong to spell it “Colored” even if you’re an American. Even Wikipedia gets that.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kayaker](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kayaker/32/441_2.png) [@kayaker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kayaker)\
**Post date:** [March 16, 2019, 10:59am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/saying-fuck-you-to-another-poster-gets-only-a-mod-note/831072/75 "2019-03-16T10:59:51Z")

</div>

> [@MrDibble](#):
>
> It’s a [proper name](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coloureds)for the ethnicity, it’d be wrong to spell it “Colored” even if you’re an American. Even Wikipedia gets that.

Ouch. I did not know that.

Sorry. We coul?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Enola\_Gay](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/3ab097/32.png) [@Enola\_Gay](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Enola_Gay)\
**Post date:** [March 16, 2019, 6:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/saying-fuck-you-to-another-poster-gets-only-a-mod-note/831072/76 "2019-03-16T18:29:10Z")

</div>

> [@MrDibble](#):
>
> I’m not Black. I’m Coloured.

Mr. Dibble, does Coloured have a negative, positive, or neutral connotation? I was in South Africa during Apartheid (1982) & heard the term a lot & as an American (who would also be classified as Coloured under SA’s definition), I found the term to be quite offensive. So I’m curious as to how it is perceived today.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MrDibble](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mrdibble/32/114_2.png) [@MrDibble](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MrDibble)\
**Post date:** [March 16, 2019, 9:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/saying-fuck-you-to-another-poster-gets-only-a-mod-note/831072/77 "2019-03-16T21:08:29Z")

</div>

It’s completely neutral to most people. Some people do prefer other terms, especially when they can be certain of more specificity, but most Coloureds can’t, and don’t care. The term’s never carried the offence of the American “colored folk” here, there were much worse terms for that (hence my problem with the username Hottentot Venus a few years ago) plus it was never applied to Black people, so wasn’t really the same usage as “colored”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TokyoBayer](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/tokyobayer/32/13989_2.png) [@TokyoBayer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TokyoBayer)\
**Post date:** [March 17, 2019, 8:58am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/saying-fuck-you-to-another-poster-gets-only-a-mod-note/831072/78 "2019-03-17T08:58:44Z")

</div>

> [@iiandyiiii](#):
>
> Also, I wanted to make it clear that **MrDibble** isn’t the only one who interpreted those words as he did. Reasonable people can disagree on such things, and IMO reasonable people are disagreeing in this case.

I agree. I think his interpretation was correct.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/saying-fuck-you-to-another-poster-gets-only-a-mod-note/831072.md?page=3)
