Well, I got a letter in the mail today that seems like a fabulous opportunity, but seeing as there are a lot of scams out there (some referenced in this very thread) I would like to run it past your wise counsel.
When I unfolded the letter the first thing I noticed was that it was on the letterhead of Dodie Arbiglian* J.D., a lawyer in Canada. I immediately got a queasy feeling as it is hardly ever good to get mail from a law firm whether or not you are in my line of work.
“Firstly (a reassuringly legal term). I must solicit your confidence in this transaction; this is by virtue of its nature as being utterly confidential.”
Oh good, this person knows how to keep a secret.
It turns out that one of their clients died in an accident eight years ago and no one has come forward to claim his “Payable-on-death (“P.O.D.”) savings monetary deposit in the sum Ten Million Nine Hundred and Fifty Thousand United States Dollars (US$10,950,000.00) with a Reputable Bank” (excellent: none of that Canadian money). The lack of a claim means that the government is about to swoop in and take the deposit. To thwart this, Mr. Arbiglian will add my name to the policy (I am a bit confused about what “policy” is being referenced, but IANAL, especially not a Canadian lawyer) owing to the fact that I share the last name, nationality and background (?) with the deceased. In return, me and Mr. Arbiglian, J.D. will share 90% of the proceeds with 10% going to charity, which is a nice touch.
To those of you sneering and saying “Hah! this is an obvious scam”, be aware that Mr. Arbiglian’s law firm (which I will not mention the name of, because confidentiality) has an actual website that looks quite professional and specifies that it is a leading law firm in Toronto**, which I understand is one of Canada’s major cities, and besides, the address given is an actual skyscraper in downtown Toronto not far from the CN Center, which I am told is a major building in its own right.
So this sounds entirely legit, no? I am a little concerned what Mr. Arbiglian means about “sharing” 90% of the cash. Would it be wrong to ask him up front if he has a 50-50 split in mind? And do you think I could convince him to lower the cut going to charity to, say, 3% with us splitting the additional 7%, which comes to a lot of money?
Answers needed fast, otherwise Justin Trudeau will seize the $19,950,000 and use it on fripperies.
*name changed to…uh, not sure who I’d be protecting here but TPTB would probably prefer I not use the real name.
**according to the website, the law firm not only covers a wide range of civil law practice, but also makes yoga and meditation services available to all its clients, another nice touch.