Here’s an interesting scam that’s worth talking about - comments on social media that look like this:
Thanks for sharing such valuable information! I need some advice. I have a SafePal wallet with USDT and I have the seed phrase (east, bedroom, contribute, aquarium, friendly, decline, perform, shark, bucket piano, catamaran, detergent). What’s the best way to send them to Binance?
So at face value, this appears to be a naive person accidentally sharing a critical piece of sensitive information online (the seed phrase, which is like a password for a crypto wallet - NB the one in the above quote I just made up for this example).
The target victim is someone who knows enough to realise that they can access the contents of the SafePal wallet using the seed phrase; when they do this, they discover that the wallet contains the equivalent of thousands of dollars in crypto - usually USDT. The ‘victim’ decided to make off with some or all of the money by transferring it to their own wallet.
They immediately hit a snag - there is a fee for the network service used to make the transfer, and this fee cannot be paid using a portion of the USDT value in the wallet - it needs to be paid in a separate cryptocurrency (usually TRX).
The fee is some smallish fraction of the potential prize, so the opportunistic thief-victim deposits a sufficient amount of TRX into the wallet and attempts to effect the transfer.
Only at this point do they discover that an additional security feature is in place - outbound transfers require two electronic signatures - and they are not in possession of the information to authorise the outbound transfer - they cannot transfer out the USDT; they cannot even recover the TRX they paid in.
The scammer (who does have the information for both signatures) has automation set up at their end, to empty the TRX out, resetting the trap for the next victim.
This is a particularly interesting one because the scam only targets people who are sufficiently dishonest to try to take advantage of a person who appears to be oversharing sensitive financial information. So I suppose an argument could be made that the victim deserves what they get. Not sure I’m completely comfortable making that argument though, so I won’t.