# Sci-fi/action movie tech that is worse than our current tech--and STUPID!

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sci-fi-action-movie-tech-that-is-worse-than-our-current-tech-and-stupid/789293>\
**Category:** Cafe Society\
**Created:** [June 18, 2017, 3:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sci-fi-action-movie-tech-that-is-worse-than-our-current-tech-and-stupid/789293 "2017-06-18T15:29:51Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 4\
**Page:** 10

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DesertDog](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/desertdog/32/11503_2.png) [@DesertDog](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DesertDog)\
**Post date:** [June 29, 2017, 3:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sci-fi-action-movie-tech-that-is-worse-than-our-current-tech-and-stupid/789293/181 "2017-06-29T15:02:13Z")

</div>

> [@buddha\_david](#):
>
> Forget the sword, I’m more concerned about getting impaled on [the guy’s hair!](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Cloud_Strife.png)

(Dunno how I missed this earlier)

You laugh, but in the, um, adult anime [_La Blue Girl_](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Blue_Girl), [Miko](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Blue_Girl#Characters), the main heroine can use her pubic hair as a weapon.

> [@wiki](#):
>
> Miko can use many unusual sexual techniques, such as hardening her pubic hair into needles and firing them at an opponent…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Pantastic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/3bc359/32.png) [@Pantastic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Pantastic)\
**Post date:** [June 29, 2017, 4:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sci-fi-action-movie-tech-that-is-worse-than-our-current-tech-and-stupid/789293/182 "2017-06-29T16:49:37Z")

</div>

> [@Ranchoth](#):
>
> I believe that’s the “Doylist” perspective, more or less. The “Watsonian” one might be that Johnny Rico himself was uninterested in, or felt an in-universe reader would already be familiar with, the details of the Civil Service.

As far as I’m concerned, the book is the book. What the author intended or thought of later or decided to retcon in a sequel may be interesting, but what a book says is limited to the words in the book. I feel like writing a book that says “A” and then later going “oh yeah, it’s really B” is just cheating. It also makes reading the book pointless, as you don’t actually get the story from the book, but have to wait for the author to die and all of their papers to be published in case they change anything later, which is silly.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mr.Doremro](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/5f8ce5/32.png) [@Mr.Doremro](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mr.Doremro)\
**Post date:** [June 29, 2017, 5:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sci-fi-action-movie-tech-that-is-worse-than-our-current-tech-and-stupid/789293/183 "2017-06-29T17:42:14Z")

</div>

> [@CalMeacham](#):
>
> Without carefully looking over al the prior entries, I don’t think anyone has yet mentioned Stormtrooper Armor. It’s clumsy and confining and evidently is useless at stopping blasters from hurting you. It’s a continuing mystery why anyone wears it.

My fanwank for Stormtrooper armor was that energy weapons are not as ubiquitous as they seem throughout the galaxy and projectile weapons (like what the Tusken Raiders used to take potshots at the pod racers in The Phantom Menace - known to us Terrans as ‘guns’ ;)) were equally/more common. To which the Stormtrooper armor was perfectly fine in providing protection.

Then I remember Ewoks beating the crap out of Stormtroopers on Endor with tree branches and my theory gets torched like Uncle Owen and Aunt Beru ☹

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_Other\_Waldo\_Pepper](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/the_other_waldo_pepper/32/12370_2.png) [@The\_Other\_Waldo\_Pepper](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Other_Waldo_Pepper)\
**Post date:** [June 29, 2017, 6:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sci-fi-action-movie-tech-that-is-worse-than-our-current-tech-and-stupid/789293/184 "2017-06-29T18:40:06Z")

</div>

> [@Mr.Doremro](#):
>
> My fanwank for Stormtrooper armor was that energy weapons are not as ubiquitous as they seem throughout the galaxy and projectile weapons (like what the Tusken Raiders used to take potshots at the pod racers in The Phantom Menace - known to us Terrans as ‘guns’ ;)) were equally/more common. To which the Stormtrooper armor was perfectly fine in providing protection.
> 
> Then I remember Ewoks beating the crap out of Stormtroopers on Endor with tree branches and my theory gets torched like Uncle Owen and Aunt Beru ☹

For what it’s worth, consider the exposition from BATMAN BEGINS, for the prototype body armor that Wayne Enterprises had been working on for the military – the stuff that (a) the Pentagon said would’ve been way too expensive per soldier; and, besides, (b) is only bulletproof against “anything but a straight shot.”

So our hero of course starts wearing that discarded prototype, and so long as nobody ever lines up a straight shot the nimble ninja survives glancing gunshots while putting crooks in the hospital. But I ask you: what if folks in the movies are _only ever_ shown landing straight shots against Stormtrooper armor?

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sci-fi-action-movie-tech-that-is-worse-than-our-current-tech-and-stupid/789293.md?page=9)
