# SCOTUS grants cert in NYSRPA v NYC (gun case)

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/scotus-grants-cert-in-nysrpa-v-nyc-gun-case/828201>\
**Category:** Miscellaneous and Personal Stuff I Must Share\
**Created:** [January 22, 2019, 3:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/scotus-grants-cert-in-nysrpa-v-nyc-gun-case/828201 "2019-01-22T15:54:11Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 4\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iamthewalrus\_3](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/258eb7/32.png) [@iamthewalrus\_3](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iamthewalrus_3)\
**Post date:** [April 19, 2019, 9:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/scotus-grants-cert-in-nysrpa-v-nyc-gun-case/828201/21 "2019-04-19T21:33:36Z")

</div>

> [@UltraVires](#):
>
> After the Supreme Court grants cert, the state repeals the law, says it is now moot and the case is dismissed. The law is then re-enacted. Rinse and repeat.

The second time, the case won’t be dismissed, because the Supreme Court isn’t dumb.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bone](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bone/32/407_2.png) [@Bone](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bone)\
**Post date:** [May 20, 2019, 3:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/scotus-grants-cert-in-nysrpa-v-nyc-gun-case/828201/22 "2019-05-20T15:46:55Z")

</div>

> [@Bone](#):
>
> [Looks like NY is balking.](https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/18/18-280/96331/20190412152613471_nysrpa%20v%20cny%2018-180%20ltr%204%2012%2019.pdf) They are seeking to moot the case, and I suspect it’s out of a desire to not want to create precedent.
> 
> I would hope SCOTUS would still hear the case, but I would think they would probably punt at this point.

I was wrong. [SCOTUS denied the motion April 29.](https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/new-york-state-rifle-pistol-association-inc-v-city-of-new-york-new-york/) Looks like the case will move forward.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![HurricaneDitka](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/96bed5/32.png) [@HurricaneDitka](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/HurricaneDitka)\
**Post date:** [October 7, 2019, 5:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/scotus-grants-cert-in-nysrpa-v-nyc-gun-case/828201/23 "2019-10-07T17:40:08Z")

</div>

Oral arguments are [scheduled for Dec 2nd](https://www.scotusblog.com/events/2019-12/).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Iggy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/iggy/32/3364_2.png) [@Iggy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Iggy)\
**Post date:** [October 13, 2019, 8:02am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/scotus-grants-cert-in-nysrpa-v-nyc-gun-case/828201/24 "2019-10-13T08:02:23Z")

</div>

While the case has been set for argument the Court did not totally reject the possibility of declaring the whole thing moot.

Per Scotusblog, "[T]he justices made clear that the case will move forward: They rejected the city’s request to dismiss the case as moot immediately, instead announcing that the “question of mootness will be subject to further consideration, and the parties should be prepared to discuss it.”

This does mean that a certain part of the very limited time for oral arguments will likely be devoted the to question of mootness leaving less time to deal with the heart of the issue.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/scotus-grants-cert-in-nysrpa-v-nyc-gun-case/828201.md?page=1)