# SCOTUS to hear case of praying ex-football coach (yet another "religious liberty" case)

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/scotus-to-hear-case-of-praying-ex-football-coach-yet-another-religious-liberty-case/957891>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [January 16, 2022, 11:02am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/scotus-to-hear-case-of-praying-ex-football-coach-yet-another-religious-liberty-case/957891 "2022-01-16T11:02:49Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 11

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![running\_coach](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/running_coach/32/15836_2.png) [@running\_coach](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/running_coach)\
**Post date:** [October 28, 2022, 4:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/scotus-to-hear-case-of-praying-ex-football-coach-yet-another-religious-liberty-case/957891/201 "2022-10-28T16:36:26Z")

</div>

> [@k9bfriender](#):
>
> > [@Jasmine](#):
> >
> > Quiz: What is absurd about this statement? 🙄
> 
> > [@](#):
> >
> > private religious expression
> 
> is the opposite of
> 
> > [@](#):
> >
> > praying in public -

Not if you handwave hard enough.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jasmine](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jasmine/32/2964_2.png) [@Jasmine](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jasmine)\
**Post date:** [October 28, 2022, 4:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/scotus-to-hear-case-of-praying-ex-football-coach-yet-another-religious-liberty-case/957891/202 "2022-10-28T16:50:11Z")

</div>

We have a winner! 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![silenus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/silenus/32/166_2.png) [@silenus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/silenus)\
**Post date:** [October 28, 2022, 4:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/scotus-to-hear-case-of-praying-ex-football-coach-yet-another-religious-liberty-case/957891/203 "2022-10-28T16:54:24Z")

</div>

His lawyer is really Humpty Dumpty.

“When _I_ use a word… it means just what I choose it to mean – neither more nor less.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![crowmanyclouds](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/crowmanyclouds/32/19884_2.png) [@crowmanyclouds](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/crowmanyclouds)\
**Post date:** [October 28, 2022, 4:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/scotus-to-hear-case-of-praying-ex-football-coach-yet-another-religious-liberty-case/957891/204 "2022-10-28T16:56:37Z")

</div>

Channeling my inner Fundy;  
‘If America isn’t a Christian nation for Christians then why did Jesus right the Constitution?’

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SoToasty](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/sotoasty/32/2803_2.png) [@SoToasty](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SoToasty)\
**Post date:** [October 28, 2022, 7:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/scotus-to-hear-case-of-praying-ex-football-coach-yet-another-religious-liberty-case/957891/205 "2022-10-28T19:23:27Z")

</div>

Love the right spelling (on purpose, or happy accident?)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![crowmanyclouds](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/crowmanyclouds/32/19884_2.png) [@crowmanyclouds](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/crowmanyclouds)\
**Post date:** [October 28, 2022, 11:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/scotus-to-hear-case-of-praying-ex-football-coach-yet-another-religious-liberty-case/957891/206 "2022-10-28T23:02:57Z")

</div>

On purpose.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Odesio](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/odesio/32/20003_2.png) [@Odesio](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Odesio)\
**Post date:** [October 29, 2022, 6:18am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/scotus-to-hear-case-of-praying-ex-football-coach-yet-another-religious-liberty-case/957891/207 "2022-10-29T06:18:50Z")

</div>

> [@bump](#):
>
> BTW… I went to Bremerton this last July to see the USS Turner Joy and the Puget Sound Naval Museum. Nice place! I was very pleasantly surprised by the town.

I also visited the Turner Joy when I was in the Seattle area back in 2013. Bremerton was the only place in the area I didn’t smell any pot.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Whack-a-Mole](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/whack-a-mole/32/141_2.png) [@Whack-a-Mole](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Whack-a-Mole)\
**Post date:** [October 29, 2022, 6:45am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/scotus-to-hear-case-of-praying-ex-football-coach-yet-another-religious-liberty-case/957891/208 "2022-10-29T06:45:39Z")

</div>

You (probably) thought you were joking:

Title: **Mike Pence says Americans don’t have a right to freedom from religion**

> **[Watch: Mike Pence declares that Americans have no right to 'freedom from...](https://www.salon.com/2022/10/27/mike-pence-says-americans-dont-have-a-right-to-freedom-from-religion_partner/)**
>
> Former Vice President Mike Pence claimed during a Wednesday appearance on Fox Business that the First Amendment to the United States Constitution does not protect Americans from having other people's faiths forced upon them.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![crowmanyclouds](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/crowmanyclouds/32/19884_2.png) [@crowmanyclouds](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/crowmanyclouds)\
**Post date:** [October 29, 2022, 6:54am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/scotus-to-hear-case-of-praying-ex-football-coach-yet-another-religious-liberty-case/957891/209 "2022-10-29T06:54:48Z")

</div>

> [@Whack-a-Mole](#):
>
> You (probably) thought you were joking:

Nope, I’ve been hearing this shit from conservative fundies since the 1970’s . . . IOW all my life.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Novelty\_Bobble](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/a3d4f5/32.png) [@Novelty\_Bobble](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Novelty_Bobble)\
**Post date:** [October 29, 2022, 8:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/scotus-to-hear-case-of-praying-ex-football-coach-yet-another-religious-liberty-case/957891/210 "2022-10-29T20:52:14Z")

</div>

> [@running\_coach](#):
>
> Short answer: What’s _not_ absurd?

I’m not sure that follows though.

A person can make their own private choice to pray, the fact that it is _performed_ in public doesn’t change the fact that it is their own private choice of religious expression.

(e.g. I have a right to my own private choice to eat what I want, including eating it in public.)

Now when it co-opts, pressures or otherwise influences _others_, that is when it stops being private in my opinion. (which I believe it does in this case)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![k9bfriender](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/k9bfriender/32/3283_2.png) [@k9bfriender](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/k9bfriender)\
**Post date:** [October 29, 2022, 10:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/scotus-to-hear-case-of-praying-ex-football-coach-yet-another-religious-liberty-case/957891/211 "2022-10-29T22:09:45Z")

</div>

Protestors who block traffic to try to make their point should stop chanting and start praying. It’s just their private choice of religious expression to pray in the middle of a public road.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [October 29, 2022, 10:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/scotus-to-hear-case-of-praying-ex-football-coach-yet-another-religious-liberty-case/957891/212 "2022-10-29T22:30:05Z")

</div>

I’m just waiting for some couple to have sex on the 50 yard line right after a game, and then appeal their arrest on the grounds that, as set in this precedent, they were in private.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Novelty\_Bobble](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/a3d4f5/32.png) [@Novelty\_Bobble](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Novelty_Bobble)\
**Post date:** [October 30, 2022, 1:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/scotus-to-hear-case-of-praying-ex-football-coach-yet-another-religious-liberty-case/957891/213 "2022-10-30T13:53:01Z")

</div>

> [@k9bfriender](#):
>
> Protestors who block traffic to try to make their point should stop chanting and start praying. It’s just their private choice of religious expression to pray in the middle of a public road

By the standard I state above, those people praying in the middle of the road are having a negative effect on others.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Novelty\_Bobble](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/a3d4f5/32.png) [@Novelty\_Bobble](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Novelty_Bobble)\
**Post date:** [October 30, 2022, 1:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/scotus-to-hear-case-of-praying-ex-football-coach-yet-another-religious-liberty-case/957891/214 "2022-10-30T13:58:29Z")

</div>

> [@Chronos](#):
>
> I’m just waiting for some couple to have sex on the 50 yard line right after a game, and then appeal their arrest on the grounds that, as set in this precedent, they were in private.

Same as above, I think a reasonable person would say that having sex in public could be considered as having a negative effect on others (plus, there may be a consideration as to whether the half way line is perhaps private property)

I don’t think that the same could be said for someone making a personal choice to pray in public. I think people should definitely have a protected right to do so.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Babale](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/babale/32/15666_2.png) [@Babale](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Babale)\
**Post date:** [October 30, 2022, 2:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/scotus-to-hear-case-of-praying-ex-football-coach-yet-another-religious-liberty-case/957891/215 "2022-10-30T14:53:37Z")

</div>

> [@Novelty\_Bobble](#):
>
> Same as above, I think a reasonable person would say that having sex in public could be considered as having a negative effect on others (plus, there may be a consideration as to whether the half way line is perhaps private property)
> 
> I don’t think that the same could be said for someone making a personal choice to pray in public. I think people should definitely have a protected right to do so

Really? What negative impact is caused by seeing a couple having sex? I guess it might offend someone - sort of like seeing someone pray might offend someone.

Of course, casual displays of sexuality are frowned upon by the moral code of Christianity; while seeing someone pray is, of course, NOT frowned upon by Christianity. But why should that be the standard?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Novelty\_Bobble](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/a3d4f5/32.png) [@Novelty\_Bobble](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Novelty_Bobble)\
**Post date:** [October 30, 2022, 3:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/scotus-to-hear-case-of-praying-ex-football-coach-yet-another-religious-liberty-case/957891/216 "2022-10-30T15:23:21Z")

</div>

> [@Babale](#):
>
> Really? What negative impact is caused by seeing a couple having sex?

This is where the “reasonable person” test comes in to it.

Do we think a reasonable person considers live graphic sex in a public place to be the equivalent of a person standing silently and praying by themselves in the same place?

As a social species we set some generally agreed limits of what constitutes “acceptable” as regards certain bodily functions and activities. I’m OK with sex being on one side of the line and personal prayer being on the other, even if I’m not personally offended by nudity and sex.

It is abitrary I readily admit.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Babale](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/babale/32/15666_2.png) [@Babale](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Babale)\
**Post date:** [October 30, 2022, 3:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/scotus-to-hear-case-of-praying-ex-football-coach-yet-another-religious-liberty-case/957891/217 "2022-10-30T15:44:43Z")

</div>

> [@Novelty\_Bobble](#):
>
> Do we think a reasonable person considers live graphic sex in a public place to be the equivalent of a person standing silently and praying by themselves in the same place?

No one was “standing silently and praying by themselves” here, so that’s a false comparison.

I think in our society the vast majority of people would not consider these things (public sex and publically leading a prayer group) to be equivalent, because the vast majority of people either hold religious views, or hold moral views that are shaped by society’s dominant religious views. We as a society are far more puritanical than we have any rational cause to be (and I include myself in that! I would also be more offended by a couple fucking on the field than a guy leading his team in praying, _but I recognize that this is just my hangup and not a rational point about how society should be run_.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bobot](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bobot/32/21622_2.png) [@bobot](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bobot)\
**Post date:** [October 30, 2022, 3:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/scotus-to-hear-case-of-praying-ex-football-coach-yet-another-religious-liberty-case/957891/218 "2022-10-30T15:56:14Z")

</div>

I don’t believe that a person who thinks that god can only hear their prayer if they make a big show of it could be described as a reasonable person.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Novelty\_Bobble](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/a3d4f5/32.png) [@Novelty\_Bobble](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Novelty_Bobble)\
**Post date:** [October 30, 2022, 3:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/scotus-to-hear-case-of-praying-ex-football-coach-yet-another-religious-liberty-case/957891/219 "2022-10-30T15:58:47Z")

</div>

> [@Babale](#):
>
> No one was “standing silently and praying by themselves” here, so that’s a false comparison.

hang on, I was referring to the wording in the following statement.

> [@Snowboarder\_Bo](#):
>
> protect the right of every American to engage in private religious expression, including praying in public

Which seems perfectly fair to me as a general statement. In the case of of the coach however I clearly stated.

> [@Novelty\_Bobble](#):
>
> Now when it co-opts, pressures or otherwise influences _others_, that is when it stops being private in my opinion. (which I believe it does in this case)

So I’ve been clear that the coach overstepped the line.

> [@Babale](#):
>
> I think in our society the vast majority of people would not consider these things (public sex and publically leading a prayer group)

I’m going to stop you right there. I said _nothing at all_ about “leading a prayer group”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Novelty\_Bobble](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/a3d4f5/32.png) [@Novelty\_Bobble](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Novelty_Bobble)\
**Post date:** [October 30, 2022, 4:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/scotus-to-hear-case-of-praying-ex-football-coach-yet-another-religious-liberty-case/957891/220 "2022-10-30T16:00:31Z")

</div>

> [@bobot](#):
>
> I don’t believe that a person who thinks that god can only hear their prayer if they make a big show of it could be described as a reasonable person

That’s not the “[reasonable person](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reasonable_person)” I’m talking about,

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/scotus-to-hear-case-of-praying-ex-football-coach-yet-another-religious-liberty-case/957891.md?page=10)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/scotus-to-hear-case-of-praying-ex-football-coach-yet-another-religious-liberty-case/957891.md?page=12)
