# SDMB should do something about the spammers

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sdmb-should-do-something-about-the-spammers/812698>\
**Category:** About This Message Board\
**Created:** [April 19, 2018, 9:55am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sdmb-should-do-something-about-the-spammers/812698 "2018-04-19T09:55:03Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 11\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TruCelt](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/trucelt/32/523_2.png) [@TruCelt](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TruCelt)\
**Post date:** [April 19, 2018, 6:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sdmb-should-do-something-about-the-spammers/812698/21 "2018-04-19T18:18:17Z")

</div>

> [@Jonathan\_Chance](#):
>
> Like Col, above, I am astounded he keeps it up. He CAN’T be making much - if anything - from it. I can’t imagine it’s salaried work. It must be performance based and I don’t think there can be much performance.
> 
> . . .

But what if he IS on salary? And what if he’s a fan, and like so many of us, reads the SDMB at to escape his boring work? So any time his supervisor comes by he just flips his screen and starts typing a SPAM post . . .  
:dubious:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Colibri](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/colibri/32/1841_2.png) [@Colibri](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Colibri)\
**Post date:** [April 19, 2018, 6:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sdmb-should-do-something-about-the-spammers/812698/22 "2018-04-19T18:32:00Z")

</div>

> [@Mangetout](#):
>
> Is it possible restrict new users from editing posts?

But we _don’t_ restrict new users from posting links (although other sites do), so his making posts without links and then editing them in is just wasted effort on his part. He’s using a strategy adapted to other boards that is pointless on this one. So we wouldn’t gain anything by this strategy.

As \*\*engineer \*\*says, he also makes dummy posts as a strategy for boards that require a certain number of posts before posting links, even though that also is wasted effort on his part.

> [@CarnalK](#):
>
> Maybe the SDMB is his spam testing lab. It’s populated enough to be useful and has a good active moderator to member ratio. So anything that works here for a while will be great on a board with less attentive moderation.

As noted, he doesn’t seem to pay much attention to what strategies we use. He does a lot of stuff that takes more effort even though we don’t use that particular method of blocking spam. And as I mentioned, these days he almost never tries to post more than one message from a given username/email address. He abandons them and generates new ones even before the previous one is banned.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![carnivorousplant](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/carnivorousplant/32/3563_2.png) [@carnivorousplant](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/carnivorousplant)\
**Post date:** [April 19, 2018, 6:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sdmb-should-do-something-about-the-spammers/812698/23 "2018-04-19T18:51:19Z")

</div>

I see spam less than once a month on the SDMB.  
I guess I don’t get around much.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Darren\_Garrison](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/darren_garrison/32/92_2.png) [@Darren\_Garrison](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Darren_Garrison)\
**Post date:** [April 19, 2018, 7:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sdmb-should-do-something-about-the-spammers/812698/24 "2018-04-19T19:05:00Z")

</div>

> [@carnivorousplant](#):
>
> I see spam less than once a month on the SDMB.  
> I guess I don’t get around much.

You probably don’t get up early enough. I’m at work and beginning to kill time on the internet at 6:00 AM East-coast time, and there will be up to a half dozen or so posts in GQ, typically with a subject line that advertises Android phones but the body is a bunch of links to alleged streaming sites. The posts are disappeared by 7 or 8 -ish.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![samclem](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/a9a28c/32.png) [@samclem](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/samclem)\
**Post date:** [April 19, 2018, 11:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sdmb-should-do-something-about-the-spammers/812698/25 "2018-04-19T23:27:55Z")

</div>

> [@Darren\_Garrison](#):
>
> You probably don’t get up early enough. I’m at work and beginning to kill time on the internet at 6:00 AM East-coast time, and there will be up to a half dozen or so posts in GQ, typically with a subject line that advertises Android phones but the body is a bunch of links to alleged streaming sites. The posts are disappeared by 7 or 8 -ish.

Yep. The guy in Bangladesh is posting while I sleep. Sometimes **ecg** is awake due to insomnia and fries the little bugger.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Quartz](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/quartz/32/267_2.png) [@Quartz](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Quartz)\
**Post date:** [April 20, 2018, 12:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sdmb-should-do-something-about-the-spammers/812698/26 "2018-04-20T12:45:00Z")

</div>

Would it be possible to restrict the ability to edit posts? Make it Members only or something?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![running\_coach](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/running_coach/32/15836_2.png) [@running\_coach](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/running_coach)\
**Post date:** [April 20, 2018, 12:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sdmb-should-do-something-about-the-spammers/812698/27 "2018-04-20T12:57:15Z")

</div>

> [@Quartz](#):
>
> Would it be possible to restrict the ability to edit posts? Make it Members only or something?

I can see one spammer buying a membership and sharing the login info. The Marketplace will become a vast swamp of spam.  
(not entirely serious) 😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Colibri](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/colibri/32/1841_2.png) [@Colibri](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Colibri)\
**Post date:** [April 20, 2018, 3:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sdmb-should-do-something-about-the-spammers/812698/28 "2018-04-20T15:49:51Z")

</div>

> [@Quartz](#):
>
> Would it be possible to restrict the ability to edit posts? Make it Members only or something?

See posts #19 and #22 above.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Peter\_Morris](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/peter_morris/32/359_2.png) [@Peter\_Morris](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Peter_Morris)\
**Post date:** [April 20, 2018, 4:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sdmb-should-do-something-about-the-spammers/812698/29 "2018-04-20T16:56:52Z")

</div>

> [@Mangetout](#):
>
> It’s not difficult to implement a solution so that new members can’t post links - …

There are various methods to combat spam. The above is one of them. Another method is to hold a member’s first few posts until a moderator has checked it.

Each methods has its advantages, and its flaws. It is sometimes very inconvenient for new members of a forum if they can’t post a link. I remember one time a couple of years ago when I wanted advice on a particular repair job. I registered at a DIY forum to ask, but was blocked from linking to photographs of the problem.

I prefer the way it’s done on the SDMB, where new members aren’t stymied the way I was. The price of that is occasionally a spam message gets through. It’s just something we have to live with.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Colibri](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/colibri/32/1841_2.png) [@Colibri](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Colibri)\
**Post date:** [April 20, 2018, 5:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sdmb-should-do-something-about-the-spammers/812698/30 "2018-04-20T17:21:57Z")

</div>

Right. We regard the current level of spam we get as annoying but not sufficiently bad to justify implementing solutions that might discourage new members.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Colibri](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/colibri/32/1841_2.png) [@Colibri](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Colibri)\
**Post date:** [April 20, 2018, 5:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sdmb-should-do-something-about-the-spammers/812698/31 "2018-04-20T17:25:43Z")

</div>

> [@Peter\_Morris](#):
>
> Another method is to hold a member’s first few posts until a moderator has checked it.

It should be noted that this solution would actually make a lot _more_ work for the mods. As it is we only check suspicious or reported posts. If we had to check every single post by a newbie it would cost a lot more time for no real benefit.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sdmb-should-do-something-about-the-spammers/812698.md?page=1)
