Ah, thanks for reminding me. To answer your question: I am not affiliated with the OPU, I’m just someone living in the same city. So if I have ever donated to the SShepherd, which I haven’t, wherever that money came from, most definitely did not come from the OPU.
And as for the claim that SShepherd ramming ships only when they are not being recorded on video, that is a lie, their website contains plenty of videos of them ramming ships.
Just trying to stay on topic 
You don’t know SmashTheState, you just live in the same city as him, and support the same charity as him, and seem terribly concerned about the image of a union for beggers he fronts for. Interesting.
Is it possible that you are, in fact, a split personality of SmashTheState? Do you ever wake up after long, unexplainable blackouts? Do you have a difficult time remembering vivid details about your personal history?
Its “Panhandlers Club” :eek:
First rule of Panhandlers Club? Wash your hands. Wash your hands very well.
Could everybody just consider perhaps a moratorium on taking (y)ourselves so goddamn seriously? I don’t doubt the sincerity of everyone’s causes and issues, but really … if posters here can mock the Catholic Church or Barack Obama or one another, so too should posters here be able to mock Sea Shepherds or the Panhandler’s Union or their supporters w/o people getting bent out of shape.
BTW going back to the original issue, hey, I can dig serious revolutionaries. But I dig even better serious *effective *revolutionaries and there’s more than one way to do that. One job in the revolution is to raise awareness through publicity, and if you’re good at that, THAT in itself IS a worthy goal… but come clean and admit that IS your gig and your strategy and not “direct action”.
Doing it by putting on a show of half-arsed direct-action makes it look like you’re being defensive or timid about that role, lest your TV network corporate patrons and the presumed target audience of animal-loving kids and middle-class granolavores get scared. (OTOH it also tells me that a lot of the kids and granolavores are indeed easily thrilled just to see someone “standing up for the whales” even if they don’t save a single one.) THAT and not “balls frozen off” is how come Sea Shepherds on the TV show look so weak, IMO. The show that’s on TV is set up to try and show how the Shepherds are NOT ecoterrorists and it’s the whalers who are a violent threat.
It’s a fine balancing act, and by trying to make “safe” TV (but with sexy hippy chicks) they’re flubbing it.
TWEEEEET!!
Accusations of trolling and sock puppetry, however thinly veiled, are not permitted in this forum.
Knock it off.
= = =
By the same token, ridiculing public organizations is protected by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution as expanded and articulated in case law. We operate under U.S. jurisdiction, here, so we are not going to babysit and protect from ridicule those persons who publicly invite ridicule. OTOH, we take a very dim view of lawsuits, (particularly frivolous ones), and will explicitly remove from our board those who engage in threats of the same.
[ /Moderating ]
Are sexy hippy chicks better in the sack than hot red headed pagan chicks?
How many SDMB males (females welcome too actually) can we round up for the sake of science?
I volunteer. I get the feeling mswas will join me. Anyone else?
Interesting.
I received a comment in my mailbox as though it was a Great Debates thread.
Silly accusations of trolling and sock puppetry are probably OK in the Pit, so I withdraw my admonition to quit it.
= = =
(The board perspective on lawsuits is without regard to fora and my comments, there, still stand.)
Sock it to 'em, Bossman!
But only if they’re silly?
Tweedle-twee, tweedle-twuppet, Alerta is probablly a StS suckpuppet!
Yes, but what I am saying is that you and Smashy have engaged in a conspiracy to take one penny and one cigarette butt and one half-eaten sandwich in ten from the panhandlers in order to donate same to Sea Shepherds.
After all, sailing around ineffectually and banging misguided hippie chicks is hard work- those sandwiches and smokes, I’m sure, go a long way, even though they are the rightful property (oops, excuse me… “possessions”) of the street people of Ottawa.
As long as it doesn’t have to take place on a boat. I’ve got this Truman-Showian fear of water.
My apologies. I didn’t realize the rules had changed.
Damn you. I just apologized.
Hmmm.
Is that “silly” as in lighthearted, or “silly” as in “it’s ok if Scylla does it?”
:dubious:
I’m on a boat and…
it’s goin’ fast and…
I gotta dirty hippie chick up in my bed man…
I’m yellin’ at whalers, on a boat like Leo,
If you on the sho’ then you sho’ not me-o!
Am I to take this as the official view of Creative Loafing Media, that public, prominent, and clearly untrue accusations of criminal activity on your message boards is explicitly tolerated?
Yes.
And no, you don’t look anything like Alerta with those glasses.
Dude.
You really don’t know when to quit when you are ahead do you?
Am I to take it of the official view of billfish678 that public, prominent, and clearly untrue accusation of not knowing when to quit is explicitly tolerated?
Um, no, since no one posting in this thread has the authority to speak for “Creative Loafing Media.”
I suggest you threaten to sue the message board. That usually gets results.
Man, don’t do it. I’ve been keeping track over the years, and there are as many as a dozen self-confessed lawyers on the Board.