# Secession:possible?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/secession-possible/640870>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [November 13, 2012, 9:23am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/secession-possible/640870 "2012-11-13T09:23:12Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 12\
**Page:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Iggy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/iggy/32/3364_2.png) [@Iggy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Iggy)\
**Post date:** [November 14, 2012, 8:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/secession-possible/640870/61 "2012-11-14T20:01:51Z")

</div>

> [@Colibri](#):
>
> To date, the Texas petition has about 90,000 signatures. Assuming all of them are genuine, that represents about 0.005 (0.5%) of the voting age population of 18,300,000 (and 0.7% of the 13,600,000 registered voters) in the state. There is no evidence of a serious or significant secession movement in Texas or any other state. This is basically lunatic fringe, not “the will of the people.”
> 
> You could probably get that many votes to elect Mickey Mouse Ambassador to Mars (which would have equivalent legal standing). Let us know when the percentage tops random noise.

Do you have to get 50% of the whole state to support a petition before you can force a referendum on the matter? What is a sufficient percentage?

Texas has differing petition signature requirements depending upon the nature of the issue. At the lower end the requirement is 5 percent or 20,000 qualified voters, whichever is less, for a citizen-initiated petition for municipal charter  
amendments. A higher ballot access threshold is in Houston where a petition triggering a recall election 25 percent  
[PDF Cite](http://www.recstx.com/Files/Petition%20Handout.pdf) Getting on the primary ballot to run for president is MUCH easier, requiring only 5000 signatures or a filing fee of $5,000.

At this point, 25-30K signatures is not a huge percentage. But if that was 25-30% then, IMHO, a referendum would be warranted. And \*if \*such a referendum passed then Congress would be foolish not to consider it seriously.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DrDeth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@DrDeth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DrDeth)\
**Post date:** [November 14, 2012, 8:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/secession-possible/640870/62 "2012-11-14T20:09:43Z")

</div>

When you get 10%, come back and we’ll talk. So far not even 1% is interested.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![md2000](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/73ab20/32.png) [@md2000](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/md2000)\
**Post date:** [November 14, 2012, 8:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/secession-possible/640870/63 "2012-11-14T20:16:45Z")

</div>

The general discussion in Canada was that a significant majority, not just 50%+1, would be required for such a huge disruptive step as splitting off a chunk of the country. You don’t want the whims of current public opinion to determine something with immense costs and permanent impact. A bad choice for president or congress can be undone at the next election. Major surgery on the institutions of state - citizenship, legal structure, government departments, international treaties, and evrything else impacted - would take years to sort out. You want to be sure that there aren’t a few percent voting that way simply because the prime minister of the time is a dipwad, or they dislike a recent tax increase… or worse yet, something like “the price of gas is too high” that the government can’t control but the referendum campaign might promise to fix even though they can’t.

It has to be a definite yes for the right reasons.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![simster](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/simster/32/1047_2.png) [@simster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/simster)\
**Post date:** [November 14, 2012, 8:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/secession-possible/640870/64 "2012-11-14T20:26:30Z")

</div>

> [@Colibri](#):
>
> He would be better suited to Secretary of Defense.

THat position is held by Yosemite Sam.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Colibri](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/colibri/32/1841_2.png) [@Colibri](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Colibri)\
**Post date:** [November 14, 2012, 8:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/secession-possible/640870/65 "2012-11-14T20:30:01Z")

</div>

> [@Iggy](#):
>
> Do you have to get 50% of the whole state to support a petition before you can force a referendum on the matter? What is a sufficient percentage?

As I said above, 100% is not sufficient to “force” a referendum on the subject.

> [@](#):
>
> At this point, 25-30K signatures is not a huge percentage. But if that was 25-30% then, IMHO, a referendum would be warranted. And \*if \*such a referendum passed then Congress would be foolish not to consider it seriously.

That would be about 4,500,000 more signatures, or about 50 times the number they have now. I think we can wait. This is just Fantasyland at this point.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Colibri](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/colibri/32/1841_2.png) [@Colibri](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Colibri)\
**Post date:** [November 14, 2012, 8:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/secession-possible/640870/66 "2012-11-14T20:31:30Z")

</div>

> [@simster](#):
>
> THat position is held by Yosemite Sam.

We need a[referendum](http://fraserstrategy.ca/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/marvin-vs-sam.jpg).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lumpy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lumpy/32/446_2.png) [@Lumpy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lumpy)\
**Post date:** [November 14, 2012, 9:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/secession-possible/640870/67 "2012-11-14T21:45:54Z")

</div>

Think of secession as a divorce: there was a time before “no fault” divorce when you couldn’t split from your spouse just because you were tired of them; the other party had a vested interest in the marriage, and you had to either show just cause or persuade the other partner to part on terms. Similarly, the union as a whole has a vested interest in it’s self-preservation which unilateral secession would violate. If a majority of 3/4ths of the states were so pissed at the Federal government that they could get an amendment passed permitting secession, then in theory the Federal government would have to accede. It would take that sort of hypermajority for it to actually happen- and, frankly, to win the civil war that might result.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Steve\_MB](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/steve_mb/32/5339_2.png) [@Steve\_MB](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Steve_MB)\
**Post date:** [November 14, 2012, 10:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/secession-possible/640870/68 "2012-11-14T22:47:34Z")

</div>

First, we need to see a proper formal declaration (e.g. “When in the Course of human Events, a bunch of Wingnuts suffers Butthurt because the Black Guy won the Election again…”)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DSYoungEsq](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/c6cbf5/32.png) [@DSYoungEsq](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DSYoungEsq)\
**Post date:** [November 15, 2012, 12:52am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/secession-possible/640870/69 "2012-11-15T00:52:49Z")

</div>

> [@Colibri](#):
>
> He would be better suited to Secretary of Defense.

[The Illudium Q-36 Explosive Space Modulator! That creature has stolen the space modulaatoooor!](http://soccernet.espn.go.com/video/espnfc/video?id=1226511&cc=5901)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lumpy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lumpy/32/446_2.png) [@Lumpy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lumpy)\
**Post date:** [November 15, 2012, 12:58am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/secession-possible/640870/70 "2012-11-15T00:58:10Z")

</div>

> [@Colibri](#):
>
> We need a[referendum](http://fraserstrategy.ca/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/marvin-vs-sam.jpg).

WHAT!? How could anyone pick some furriner over a two-fisted, red blooded, rootingist-tootingist-shootingist American like Yosemite Sam?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Colibri](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/colibri/32/1841_2.png) [@Colibri](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Colibri)\
**Post date:** [November 15, 2012, 1:25am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/secession-possible/640870/71 "2012-11-15T01:25:42Z")

</div>

> [@Lumpy](#):
>
> WHAT!? How could anyone pick some furriner over a two-fisted, red blooded, rootingist-tootingist-shootingist American like Yosemite Sam?

I meant a referendum between Bugs and Sam as to who is better able to deal with Martians.

I would vote for Bugs.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![md2000](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/73ab20/32.png) [@md2000](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/md2000)\
**Post date:** [November 15, 2012, 3:39am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/secession-possible/640870/72 "2012-11-15T03:39:08Z")

</div>

> [@Colibri](#):
>
> I meant a referendum between Bugs and Sam as to who is better able to deal with Martians.
> 
> I would vote for Bugs.

What about Daffy “Duck Dodgers”?  
Make it a 3 way race and let congress decide.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/secession-possible/640870.md?page=3)
