Self driving cars are still decades away

In My Humble Opinion
2968

Sorry to pick on you Dr. S, you just happen to be our resident Tesla optimist. This isn’t just in response to you, more of an update after the latest Tesla news about Cybercab production “starting this year.”

6 months have come and gone since Tesla’s lackluster Robotaxi rollout. I basically forgot all about the thing, which doesn’t really bode well for something that Tesla was touting as just around the corner (and, as Dr. Strangelove guesstimates above, expected by the end of 2025.)

It ends up that earlier this month, Tesla did launch a truly driverless (no safety monitor) Robotaxi service in Austin. Except… did they really? Evidently they’ve quietly rolled it back.

Let’s call this what it is: another marketing stunt.

If Tesla truly had unsupervised Robotaxis operating in Austin, riders would be posting videos constantly. David Moss wouldn’t be 0-for-42. The evidence would be everywhere.

Instead, we have a single announcement, a 4% stock bump, and silence.

So not only have they failed to deliver, they’ve apparently lied about it.

As we reported last week, the “unsupervised” Robotaxis spotted on January 22 were all being followed by trailing Tesla vehicles with safety monitors inside. Tesla didn’t remove supervision, it just moved it to a different car.

Now even that setup appears to have been scaled back or paused entirely. The vast majority of rides have safety monitors back inside the vehicle, sitting in either the driver’s seat or passenger seat.

This follows the exact pattern of the “driverless delivery” stunt from June 2025: a one-time demonstration for the cameras, timed for maximum stock impact, never to be repeated.

2969

Turns out Waymo’s “self-driving” taxis are just being driven by operators in the Phillipines.

2970

They are occasionally driven remotely when they get stuck. This is old news.

2971

And the whole “but Phillipines!” thing has a slightly racist tinge to it.

2972

It’s certainly ragingly nationalist. “Foreigners in foreign countries can’t be trusted” is one of the early planks of the Fascism cookbook.

Nothing more to see here than RW pandering to their base.

2973

Allow me to read the article for you both.

Not driven, but “influenced”, as the article goes into detail to explain. The article also covers what you just said:

Waymo has been fairly upfront about its human operators. In a May 2024 blog post, the company compared it to a “phone-a-friend.”

The headline is poor. (For that matter, the whole article is pretty shitty clickbait). From the article (bolding mine):

After being pressed for a breakdown on where these overseas operators operate, Peña said he didn’t have those stats, explaining that some operators live in the US, but others live much further away, including in the Philippines.

I don’t know why the author chose to focus in on the Philippines, and I’m not willing to watch the congressional hearing video to find out, but I can understand lawmakers being concerned that Waymo can’t even tell them where these drivers are operating from, what the training is, what the infrastructure looks like, etc. Would you be comfortable if they were operating out of Iran? I mean, it seems like a far-fetched attack vector but I don’t think it’s unreasonable for congress to ask questions and be concerned.

2974

Markey is a doddering Democrat who often pretends he understands modern things.

This isn’t even that news, since they’re not even driving remotely per the article posted.

2975

The concern I would have about remote operators (and more so in foreign countries like the Philippines) is the reliability of the internet connection. It’s part of the whole “let’s put everything in the cloud” movement out of Silicon Valley: in lots of places cellular and internet connections are not 100% reliable.