# Senator Russ Feingold moves to censure Bush over NSA wiretaps

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/senator-russ-feingold-moves-to-censure-bush-over-nsa-wiretaps/348377>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [March 14, 2006, 11:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/senator-russ-feingold-moves-to-censure-bush-over-nsa-wiretaps/348377 "2006-03-14T23:03:52Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [March 14, 2006, 11:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/senator-russ-feingold-moves-to-censure-bush-over-nsa-wiretaps/348377/1 "2006-03-14T23:03:52Z")

</div>

Senator Russ Feingold of Wisconsin – the only senator to vote against the USA PATRIOT Act in 2005 – has introduced a resolution to censure Bush for violating FISA in authorizing NSA to conduct warrantless domestic surveillance. So far, no other Senate Democrats are lining up behind him. [http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/03/13/opinion/lynch/main1397694.shtml](http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/03/13/opinion/lynch/main1397694.shtml)

Is censure appropriate?

Why aren’t the Dems backing it? Should they?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gadarene](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/e47c2d/32.png) [@Gadarene](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gadarene)\
**Post date:** [March 14, 2006, 11:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/senator-russ-feingold-moves-to-censure-bush-over-nsa-wiretaps/348377/2 "2006-03-14T23:07:41Z")

</div>

What’s the standard for a censure? Is there one?

And what’d Andrew Jackson do to get his, anyway?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [March 14, 2006, 11:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/senator-russ-feingold-moves-to-censure-bush-over-nsa-wiretaps/348377/3 "2006-03-14T23:18:34Z")

</div>

> [@Gadarene](#):
>
> What’s the standard for a censure? Is there one?

No. At least, it’s not mentioned in the Constitution, nor in the House or Senate rules. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Censure#Censure\_in\_the\_United\_States](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Censure#Censure_in_the_United_States) So I guess it’s just a matter of whipping up the votes.

> [@Gadarene](#):
>
> And what’d Andrew Jackson do to get his, anyway?

He defunded the Second Bank of the United States. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew\_Jackson#Opposition\_to\_the\_National\_Bank](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Jackson#Opposition_to_the_National_Bank)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Mace](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_mace/32/185_2.png) [@John\_Mace](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Mace)\
**Post date:** [March 15, 2006, 12:05am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/senator-russ-feingold-moves-to-censure-bush-over-nsa-wiretaps/348377/4 "2006-03-15T00:05:26Z")

</div>

I think Feingold is one of the more honorable men in Congress, but one has to wonder WTF he’s doing. There is no way the Republicans are going to vote for this, and what if they call his bluff? Then he puts his own party members in a difficult spot. It would be one thing to censure Bush for Iraq or Katrina response, or even the DPW ports deal (all very unpopular), but not for the NSA wiretapping program (it gets at least 50/50 aproval among voters, probably more).

Is he feeling a need to emphasize that he is to the left of HRC? If that’s what he’s up to, fine. He won’t be the first Senator to posture thusly in the lead-up to a presidential race. I wouldn’t even hold it against it him.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [March 15, 2006, 12:11am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/senator-russ-feingold-moves-to-censure-bush-over-nsa-wiretaps/348377/5 "2006-03-15T00:11:23Z")

</div>

> [@John Mace](#):
>
> There is no way the Republicans are going to vote for this, and what if they call his bluff?

What “bluff”? And how would the Pubs “call”?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lemur866](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lemur866/32/434_2.png) [@Lemur866](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lemur866)\
**Post date:** [March 15, 2006, 12:18am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/senator-russ-feingold-moves-to-censure-bush-over-nsa-wiretaps/348377/6 "2006-03-15T00:18:07Z")

</div>

The republican leadership could move that the censure bill be brought to the floor for a straight up or down vote. Given that no other democrats were willing to sign on to the bill, how many are going to vote for it? So the democratic senators have to decide whether to vote against the bill and therefore implicitly endorsing the president, or vote for it and look like unhinged Bush-bashers to their constituents.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Mace](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_mace/32/185_2.png) [@John\_Mace](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Mace)\
**Post date:** [March 15, 2006, 12:19am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/senator-russ-feingold-moves-to-censure-bush-over-nsa-wiretaps/348377/7 "2006-03-15T00:19:55Z")

</div>

> [@BrainGlutton](#):
>
> What “bluff”? And how would the Pubs “call”?

Sorry, I thought that was obvious. By letting this go to a vote. Feingold probably wants Hillary on record as being “pro-Domestic Spying”. He’s hoping the [Moveon.org](http://Moveon.org) crowd and other left-wing elements of the Democrtaic party will not back her, if they haven’t already decided not to.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [March 15, 2006, 12:43am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/senator-russ-feingold-moves-to-censure-bush-over-nsa-wiretaps/348377/8 "2006-03-15T00:43:27Z")

</div>

> [@John Mace](#):
>
> . . . the [Moveon.org](http://Moveon.org) crowd and other left-wing elements . . .

😛😛😛

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Mace](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_mace/32/185_2.png) [@John\_Mace](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Mace)\
**Post date:** [March 15, 2006, 1:08am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/senator-russ-feingold-moves-to-censure-bush-over-nsa-wiretaps/348377/9 "2006-03-15T01:08:47Z")

</div>

> [@BrainGlutton](#):
>
> 😛😛😛

Did you see yourself in that post? 🙂

I don’t think Feingold really wants this to come to a vote. And he’s probably pissing off the Senate Democratic leadership. I heard Frist is actually contemplating forcing a vote on it. I think all he really wanted was for the press to ask Hillary whether or not she supported it, to get her on the record. But even if he didn’t get that, he could show this action as part of his _bona fides_ to the left, and point out that he got no support from other Democrats, liek you-know-who (wink, wink).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jonathan\_Chance](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jonathan_chance/32/701_2.png) [@Jonathan\_Chance](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jonathan_Chance)\
**Post date:** [March 15, 2006, 1:11am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/senator-russ-feingold-moves-to-censure-bush-over-nsa-wiretaps/348377/10 "2006-03-15T01:11:50Z")

</div>

> [@John Mace](#):
>
> Sorry, I thought that was obvious. By letting this go to a vote. Feingold probably wants Hillary on record as being “pro-Domestic Spying”. He’s hoping the [Moveon.org](http://Moveon.org) crowd and other left-wing elements of the Democrtaic party will not back her, if they haven’t already decided not to.

BING BING BING BING BING!!! We have a winner!

Feingold appears to be a stand up guy in that he’s willing to take positions that may be unpopular in the wider world and damned to the consequences. Well and good.

But this has ‘presidential positioning’ written ALL over it. He’s thinking he can be the liberal in the democratic field in a couple of years and he wants to make moves to solidify that for the primaries.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Qadgop\_the\_Mercotan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/qadgop_the_mercotan/32/83_2.png) [@Qadgop\_the\_Mercotan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Qadgop_the_Mercotan)\
**Post date:** [March 15, 2006, 1:12am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/senator-russ-feingold-moves-to-censure-bush-over-nsa-wiretaps/348377/11 "2006-03-15T01:12:31Z")

</div>

Having met Sen. Feingold on a number of occasions in the last decade, I’d bet he’s doing this because he thinks it’s the right thing to do. He’s never been one to move in lockstep with his party, or to pay it much mind if he feels strongly about something.

Witness his lone vote against the Patriot Act (which many said would ensure his re-election defeat), his vote FOR confirming Ashcroft as Bush’s AG (he said the prez had the right to choose his own cabinet members), and his vote to prevent banning partial birth abortion (a very unpopular stance in our state, again before his re-election) because he objected to the lack of a clause for exceptions based on a grave danger to a woman’s health.

He’s also the poorest US senator (net worth $220 K in 2004, probably less nowsince he divorced after that), and refuses to accept pay raises during his term, accepting only the salary in effect the year he was elected.

He’s a maverick. And he’s the only politician I trust or will give money to.

(BTW, I expect I’ll have a former state politico residing in my place of employment soon…) 😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [March 15, 2006, 1:17am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/senator-russ-feingold-moves-to-censure-bush-over-nsa-wiretaps/348377/12 "2006-03-15T01:17:39Z")

</div>

> [@John Mace](#):
>
> Did you see yourself in that post? 🙂

My point is, you’d have to pretty politically unsophisticated to characterize [Moveon.org](http://Moveon.org) as “left-wing.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Mace](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_mace/32/185_2.png) [@John\_Mace](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Mace)\
**Post date:** [March 15, 2006, 1:18am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/senator-russ-feingold-moves-to-censure-bush-over-nsa-wiretaps/348377/13 "2006-03-15T01:18:36Z")

</div>

> [@Qadgop the Mercotan](#):
>
> Having met Sen. Feingold on a number of occasions in the last decade, I’d bet he’s doing this because he thinks it’s the right thing to do. He’s never been one to move in lockstep with his party, or to pay it much mind if he feels strongly about something.

But there are plenty of ways to do this w/o pissing off, and potentially damaging, his fellow Democrats. This just looks too poltical to not have that be at least part of his motivation. Not that there’s anything wrong with that! The one hole in that theory is one might ask: Does Feingold really have to take more action to differentiate himself from Hillary, et al? It’s not like no one notices already…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Hamlet](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/hamlet/32/2818_2.png) [@Hamlet](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Hamlet)\
**Post date:** [March 15, 2006, 1:20am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/senator-russ-feingold-moves-to-censure-bush-over-nsa-wiretaps/348377/14 "2006-03-15T01:20:11Z")

</div>

> [@Qadgop the Mercotan](#):
>
> Having met Sen. Feingold on a number of occasions in the last decade, I’d bet he’s doing this because he thinks it’s the right thing to do. He’s never been one to move in lockstep with his party, or to pay it much mind if he feels strongly about something.

I think that’s it. Had it been a political move, he could have done it before the Republicans stopped any Senate investigation into the NSA program, but it wasn’t until the Republican Senators abdicated their Congressional responsibility that he took this action. It sounds more like a last ditch effort to hold the White House accountable for its illegal wiretapping rather than a political move. I support it wholeheartedly.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Mace](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_mace/32/185_2.png) [@John\_Mace](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Mace)\
**Post date:** [March 15, 2006, 1:21am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/senator-russ-feingold-moves-to-censure-bush-over-nsa-wiretaps/348377/15 "2006-03-15T01:21:30Z")

</div>

> [@BrainGlutton](#):
>
> My point is, you’d have to pretty politically unsophisticated to characterize [Moveon.org](http://Moveon.org) as “left-wing.”

Are you calling me politically unsophisicated? Pistols at dawn, my friend!! 🙂

[Moveon.org](http://Moveon.org) represents the left wing of the Democratic party. You don’t see that because you’re way to left of them. But you’re not part of a wing. Maybe you’re one little burr on the end of the furthest feather in a wing…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [March 15, 2006, 1:26am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/senator-russ-feingold-moves-to-censure-bush-over-nsa-wiretaps/348377/16 "2006-03-15T01:26:14Z")

</div>

> [@John Mace](#):
>
> [Moveon.org](http://Moveon.org) represents the left wing of the Democratic party.

Believe me, there’s a **lot** of Dems to the left of Moveon. (Most of them are like myself, voting Dem only because it’s the leftest real game in town.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Mace](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_mace/32/185_2.png) [@John\_Mace](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Mace)\
**Post date:** [March 15, 2006, 1:35am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/senator-russ-feingold-moves-to-censure-bush-over-nsa-wiretaps/348377/17 "2006-03-15T01:35:08Z")

</div>

> [@BrainGlutton](#):
>
> Believe me, there’s a **lot** of Dems to the left of Moveon. (Most of them are like myself, voting Dem only because it’s the leftest real game in town.)

But they don’t have any sway over the party. [MoveOn.org](http://MoveOn.org) does. Just because some whacko left-wing loons\* vote democratic, doesn’t make them part of “the party”.

\*no reference to you, of course.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Merijeek](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/f05b48/32.png) [@Merijeek](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Merijeek)\
**Post date:** [March 15, 2006, 3:41am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/senator-russ-feingold-moves-to-censure-bush-over-nsa-wiretaps/348377/18 "2006-03-15T03:41:34Z")

</div>

> [@Hamlet](#):
>
> I think that’s it. Had it been a political move, he could have done it before the Republicans stopped any Senate investigation into the NSA program, but it wasn’t until the Republican Senators abdicated their Congressional responsibility that he took this action. It sounds more like a last ditch effort to hold the White House accountable for its illegal wiretapping rather than a political move. I support it wholeheartedly.

As a hijack…anyone know if Feingold is considering a presidential run in 2008?

-Joe

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Little\_Nemo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/little_nemo/32/3120_2.png) [@Little\_Nemo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Little_Nemo)\
**Post date:** [March 15, 2006, 4:02am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/senator-russ-feingold-moves-to-censure-bush-over-nsa-wiretaps/348377/19 "2006-03-15T04:02:31Z")

</div>

I have to agree with John on this one. MoveOn isn’t far left but it definitely is on the left.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tim314](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/tim314/32/3468_2.png) [@tim314](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/tim314)\
**Post date:** [March 15, 2006, 4:06am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/senator-russ-feingold-moves-to-censure-bush-over-nsa-wiretaps/348377/20 "2006-03-15T04:06:06Z")

</div>

> [@John Mace](#):
>
> The one hole in that theory is one might ask: Does Feingold really have to take more action to differentiate himself from Hillary, et al? It’s not like no one notices already…

Exactly. As a left-winger myself, I wouldn’t even _consider_ voting for Clinton over Feingold. I’d think most others on the left would feel the same way . . . and moreover, I’d think Feingold knows it.

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/senator-russ-feingold-moves-to-censure-bush-over-nsa-wiretaps/348377.md?page=2)
