# Separating immigrants from their children is child abuse.

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/separating-immigrants-from-their-children-is-child-abuse/816206>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [June 16, 2018, 4:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/separating-immigrants-from-their-children-is-child-abuse/816206 "2018-06-16T16:45:15Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 19

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bricker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/977dab/32.png) [@Bricker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bricker)\
**Post date:** [June 20, 2018, 4:22am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/separating-immigrants-from-their-children-is-child-abuse/816206/361 "2018-06-20T04:22:40Z")

</div>

> [@Czarcasm](#):
>
> What’s your position on tearing babies and toddlers from their parent’s arms and putting them in baby prison camps?

I oppose it. I think it’s cruel and unnecessary.

> [@](#):
>
> Or are you more concerned with playing “gotcha” word games?

I don’t see my question as a gotcha word game. “I have worked in child welfare for 23 years and have never seen a parent placed in jail for shoplifting,” seems like an improbable factual claim to me, to the extent it suggests that parents are never, or rarely, jailed for shoplifting… Does it ring true to you?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Banquet\_Bear](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/banquet_bear/32/373_2.png) [@Banquet\_Bear](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Banquet_Bear)\
**Post date:** [June 20, 2018, 4:36am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/separating-immigrants-from-their-children-is-child-abuse/816206/362 "2018-06-20T04:36:03Z")

</div>

> [@Bricker](#):
>
> “I have worked in child welfare for 23 years and have never seen a parent placed in jail for shoplifting,” seems like an improbable factual claim to me, to the extent it suggests that parents are never, or rarely, jailed for shoplifting… Does it ring true to you?

…where I live almost nobody is jailed for shoplifting. I’ve never heard of anyone getting jailed for shoplifting. Yeah, I live in another country. So can you clear this up once and for all? Rather than playing games, can you just tell us how often people go to jail for shoplifting in the United States, and for how long they typically go to jail for?

Because the claim “parents are never, or rarely, jailed for shoplifting” rings true for me. If it isn’t true, and if you are in the position to tell us that it isn’t true, then just tell us already.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GIGObuster](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/gigobuster/32/421_2.png) [@GIGObuster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GIGObuster)\
**Post date:** [June 20, 2018, 4:47am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/separating-immigrants-from-their-children-is-child-abuse/816206/363 "2018-06-20T04:47:58Z")

</div>

> [@Bricker](#):
>
> I oppose it. I think it’s cruel and unnecessary.
> 
> I don’t see my question as a gotcha word game. “I have worked in child welfare for 23 years and have never seen a parent placed in jail for shoplifting,” seems like an improbable claim to me. Does it ring true to you?

Does it mean that the rest that you did not comment was also not accurate?

That issue you nitpick is IMHO also one of those “Two wrongs do not make it right” Poor people are **beginning** to be on many states to have their misdemeanors pumped up into higher crimes. Contributing to the breakdown of families that the high incarceration rates seen in this country are giving us. And it seems that the point of the poster that reported not seeing a shoplifter with family sent to jail is plausible because the policies being changed in some states is a recent development and until recently a first offence was not usually enough to send one to prison, it depends on some places where locals laws are harsher. And with changes in policies that are becoming draconian.

> **[12 years in jail for shoplifting: how Walmart is helping prosecutors hike up...](https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/may/17/walmart-shoplifting-helping-hike-sentences-court)**
>
> The case of a man facing 12 years in prison for shoplifting shows a growing trend in America: corporations successfully pushing state prosecutors to increase shoplifting charges to felonies

As for the matter at hand:

Trump, and many Republicans that you support, **want this. It is a feature for them to see how the cruelty that they are unleashing, on purpose, is upsetting their “enemies”.**

> **[Trump cruel to migrant kids to drive immigration political wedge](https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow/watch/trump-cruel-to-migrant-kids-to-drive-immigration-political-wedge-1259660867952?playlist=associated&v=a)**
>
> Rachel Maddow points out that Donald Trump and his political allies are fomenting outrage over the cruel treatment of migrant children on purpose to boost their anti-immigrant credibility and bolster political support.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bricker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/977dab/32.png) [@Bricker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bricker)\
**Post date:** [June 20, 2018, 5:03am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/separating-immigrants-from-their-children-is-child-abuse/816206/364 "2018-06-20T05:03:57Z")

</div>

> [@Banquet\_Bear](#):
>
> …where I live almost nobody is jailed for shoplifting. I’ve never heard of anyone getting jailed for shoplifting. Yeah, I live in another country. So can you clear this up once and for all? Rather than playing games, can you just tell us how often people go to jail for shoplifting in the United States, and for how long they typically go to jail for?
> 
> Because the claim “parents are never, or rarely, jailed for shoplifting” rings true for me. If it isn’t true, and if you are in the position to tell us that it isn’t true, then just tell us already.

In my experience as a public defender, shoplifting was an extremely common charge, and resulted in jail (pre-trial detention but unable to make bail) and/or jail (sentence following conviction) fairly often when prior convictions were extant. In Virginia the shoplifting of goods valued at over $200 was a felony, although we’ve just this past year upped it to $500.

For first offenders, jail would be extremely unlikely.

Quite a few people who went to jail were parents.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![HurricaneDitka](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/96bed5/32.png) [@HurricaneDitka](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/HurricaneDitka)\
**Post date:** [June 20, 2018, 5:15am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/separating-immigrants-from-their-children-is-child-abuse/816206/365 "2018-06-20T05:15:31Z")

</div>

[Find The Right Lawyer. Learn About Your Legal Issue | Lawyers.com](http://www.attorneys.com/criminal-defense/charges-for-shoplifting) gives a pretty good rundown of the range of punishments for shoplifting:

> [@](#):
>
> … it is the dollar value of the item that determines the charge, not its size. States differ in the exact value that elevates shoplifting to a felony, although it is typically between $50 and $500. New Jersey sets the upper limit for a minor offense at $200, and the Florida theft statutes create a tiered system where generally theft of $100 or less is a second-degree misdemeanor, while stealing merchandise valued between $100 and $300 is a first-degree misdemeanor. Anything of greater value is a felony.  
> …  
> In some states, a second conviction is a mandatory felony regardless of the value of the item stolen.
> 
> Possible Sentences for Shoplifting Charges
> 
> Sentencing for a shoplifting conviction depends on the severity of the charges. For misdemeanor charges most states set punishments of up to one year in jail and a relatively small fine, often not more than $500. The exact sentence can depend on the class of misdemeanor and the existence of prior convictions. Juveniles are often eligible for lighter sentences than adults.
> 
> Felony shoplifting charges are much more serious, with the potential for several years in prison and several thousands of dollars in fines. For example, a third-degree felony in Florida is eligible for up to five years in prison and a $5,000 fine. …

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bricker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/977dab/32.png) [@Bricker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bricker)\
**Post date:** [June 20, 2018, 5:17am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/separating-immigrants-from-their-children-is-child-abuse/816206/366 "2018-06-20T05:17:21Z")

</div>

> [@GIGObuster](#):
>
> Does it mean that the rest that you did not comment was also not accurate?
> 
> That issue you nitpick is IMHO also one of those “Two wrongs do not make it right” Poor people are **beginning** to be on many states to have their misdemeanors pumped up into higher crimes. Contributing to the breakdown of families that the high incarceration rates seen in this country are giving us. And it seems that the point of the poster that reported not seeing a shoplifter with family sent to jail is plausible because the policies being changed in some states is a recent development and until recently a first offence was not usually enough to send one to prison, it depends on some places where locals laws are harsher. And with changes in policies that are becoming draconian.

I don’t really understand the point you’re making. But I can tell you that if **Ellecram** had said, “I have worked in child welfare for 23 years and have never seen a parent placed in jail for \*a first offense of \*shoplifting,” I would not have had any problem with the observation. It’s identical to my own experience: I also never saw anyone get jailed _ **for a first offense** _.

But since “first offense,” was not part of **Ellecram** ’s observation, I had to disagree.

> [@GIGObuster](#):
>
> [12 years in jail for shoplifting: how Walmart is helping prosecutors hike up sentences | Police | The Guardian](https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/may/17/walmart-shoplifting-helping-hike-sentences-court)

That’s your link, and it’s titled: “12 years in jail for shoplifting: how Walmart is helping prosecutors hike up sentences.”

So you post a link that describes being jailed for shoplifting, and then complain about my objection to someone who posted that in 23 years, they had never seen a parent jailed for shoplifting?

Does the claim, “I have worked in child welfare for 23 years and have never seen a parent placed in jail for shoplifting,” seem like it’s a likely experience for most similarly-situated observers to have?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Czarcasm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/czarcasm/32/4050_2.png) [@Czarcasm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Czarcasm)\
**Post date:** [June 20, 2018, 5:20am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/separating-immigrants-from-their-children-is-child-abuse/816206/367 "2018-06-20T05:20:40Z")

</div>

“Yeah, I guess taking babies from mothers is bad. Now let’s get back to what I want to talk about-the minute legal details about shoplifting penalties…”  
Holy Deflection, Batman!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Banquet\_Bear](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/banquet_bear/32/373_2.png) [@Banquet\_Bear](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Banquet_Bear)\
**Post date:** [June 20, 2018, 5:28am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/separating-immigrants-from-their-children-is-child-abuse/816206/368 "2018-06-20T05:28:14Z")

</div>

> [@Bricker](#):
>
> In my experience as a public defender, shoplifting was an extremely common charge, and resulted in jail (pre-trial detention but unable to make bail) and/or jail (sentence following conviction) fairly often when prior convictions were extant. In Virginia the shoplifting of goods valued at over $200 was a felony, although we’ve just this past year upped it to $500.
> 
> For first offenders, jail would be extremely unlikely.
> 
> Quite a few people who went to jail were parents.

…thank you. 🙂

Another question: do you think, that in your experience as a public defender, your perception of “what is extremely common” may possibly be skewed? By extremely common, can you give us some numbers?

> [@Czarcasm](#):
>
> “Yeah, I guess taking babies from mothers is bad. Now let’s get back to what I want to talk about-the minute legal details about shoplifting penalties…”  
> Holy Deflection, Batman!

To be fair, his latest post does help the discussion. The talking points used by the administration are a weapon. Being able to effectively counter them with the truth is what is needed, and if that means a few more posts about shoplifting so we can get things resolved then I think we should just get through it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Czarcasm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/czarcasm/32/4050_2.png) [@Czarcasm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Czarcasm)\
**Post date:** [June 20, 2018, 5:33am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/separating-immigrants-from-their-children-is-child-abuse/816206/369 "2018-06-20T05:33:55Z")

</div>

> [@Banquet\_Bear](#):
>
> To be fair, his latest post does help the discussion. The talking points used by the administration are a weapon. Being able to effectively counter them with the truth is what is needed, and if that means a few more posts about shoplifting so we can get things resolved then I think we should just get through it.

But in cases like this the point isn’t to “get through it”-the point is to use it to divert and tire out, then move on the next side issue. It’s a never-ending chain of vocabulary and/or legal nitpicks.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bricker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/977dab/32.png) [@Bricker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bricker)\
**Post date:** [June 20, 2018, 5:35am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/separating-immigrants-from-their-children-is-child-abuse/816206/370 "2018-06-20T05:35:00Z")

</div>

> [@Banquet\_Bear](#):
>
> …thank you. 🙂
> 
> Another question: do you think, that in your experience as a public defender, your perception of “what is extremely common” may possibly be skewed? By extremely common, can you give us some numbers?

I suspect I was in a good position to perceive accurately. People arrested for shoplifting could either represent themselves, qualify for a public defender, or retain private counsel. I suppose a Commonwealth’s Attorney (the prosecutor in Virginia) would have been in a better position, but mine was the second-best vantage point.

When you say “numbers,” are you looking for totals I personally dealt with? Totals through the courts I worked? What?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bricker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/977dab/32.png) [@Bricker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bricker)\
**Post date:** [June 20, 2018, 5:38am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/separating-immigrants-from-their-children-is-child-abuse/816206/371 "2018-06-20T05:38:28Z")

</div>

> [@Czarcasm](#):
>
> “Yeah, I guess taking babies from mothers is bad. Now let’s get back to what I want to talk about-the minute legal details about shoplifting penalties…”  
> Holy Deflection, Batman!

But there’s no debate on the “taking babies from mothers is bad,” point. I agree with it. Is it your desire that we do a series of posts in which each participant repeats, in rotation, his affirmation of that point?

And when, if ever, is the time to address the likelihood of claims like, “I have worked in child welfare for 23 years and have never seen a parent placed in jail for shoplifting?” Does that claim get insulated from any review, ever?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Banquet\_Bear](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/banquet_bear/32/373_2.png) [@Banquet\_Bear](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Banquet_Bear)\
**Post date:** [June 20, 2018, 5:39am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/separating-immigrants-from-their-children-is-child-abuse/816206/372 "2018-06-20T05:39:44Z")

</div>

> [@Bricker](#):
>
> When you say “numbers,” are you looking for totals I personally dealt with? Totals through the courts I worked? What?

…can you quantify “extremely common?” What you regard as “extremely common” and what I regard as “extremely common” maybe two different things. I think 5-10 cases a day. You might be thinking 1-2 case per week.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Banquet\_Bear](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/banquet_bear/32/373_2.png) [@Banquet\_Bear](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Banquet_Bear)\
**Post date:** [June 20, 2018, 5:43am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/separating-immigrants-from-their-children-is-child-abuse/816206/373 "2018-06-20T05:43:33Z")

</div>

> [@Bricker](#):
>
> And when, if ever, is the time to address the likelihood of claims like, “I have worked in child welfare for 23 years and have never seen a parent placed in jail for shoplifting?” Does that claim get insulated from any review, ever?

…its an anecdote Bricker, offered from the perspective of someone that works in a related field in some other part of the country. You’ve countered it with your own anecdote from a related field in your part of the country. I’m not in the position to dispute either anecdote, I’m taking you at your word, but at the same time I have no reason to doubt what Ellecram has said. You aren’t offering “review.” You have simply provided another anecdote.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bricker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/977dab/32.png) [@Bricker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bricker)\
**Post date:** [June 20, 2018, 5:48am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/separating-immigrants-from-their-children-is-child-abuse/816206/374 "2018-06-20T05:48:09Z")

</div>

> [@Banquet\_Bear](#):
>
> …can you quantify “extremely common?” What you regard as “extremely common” and what I regard as “extremely common” maybe two different things. I think 5-10 cases a day. You might be thinking 1-2 case per week.

I see.

Well, then I can say it was way closer to 1-3 shoplifting cases per week than 5-10 cases per day. As overworked as we all were, I don’t think any of my colleagues had an average of 5-10 shoplifting cases per day. Of course there were other, non-shoplifting cases as well.

But to my mind, if the claim under discussion is that “no parent” is ever seen to be jailed for shoplifting, then it seems that even 1-3 cases per week, and perhaps one per month getting a jail sentence, is enough to suggest that maybe NO CASES in 23 YEARS is a bit exaggerated.

Naturally, not all my cases involved parents. But equally naturally, not all of them involved childless people either. I can’t claim to have any kind of perfect recollection on this point, but a best-guess, highly rough estimate? One-fifth of my shoplifters were parents.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bricker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/977dab/32.png) [@Bricker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bricker)\
**Post date:** [June 20, 2018, 5:51am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/separating-immigrants-from-their-children-is-child-abuse/816206/375 "2018-06-20T05:51:43Z")

</div>

> [@Banquet\_Bear](#):
>
> …its an anecdote Bricker, offered from the perspective of someone that works in a related field in some other part of the country. You’ve countered it with your own anecdote from a related field in your part of the country. I’m not in the position to dispute either anecdote, I’m taking you at your word, but at the same time I have no reason to doubt what Ellecram has said. You aren’t offering “review.” You have simply provided another anecdote.

That’s a fair objection, but . . . 23 YEARS?? Not one case in 23 years??

Tell you what: I aver that for every state in the United States, I can cite at least one case of a parent jailed for shoplifting in the past 23 years. Pick a state. I’ll do the research.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Warm\_blood](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/df705f/32.png) [@Warm\_blood](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Warm_blood)\
**Post date:** [June 20, 2018, 5:51am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/separating-immigrants-from-their-children-is-child-abuse/816206/376 "2018-06-20T05:51:48Z")

</div>

To everyone rationalising this grotesque policy: the practice of unduly separating parents from their children has been a cornerstone of slavery, residential schooling and concentration camps. So when you’re making excuses for the abhorrent decision-making of this morally bankrupt administration, know which side of history you’re placing yourself on.

Also, realise that you’re championing children being left defenceless in the presence of child predators: [Texas deputy sexually abused undocumented immigrant girl, 4, sheriff says - CBS News](https://www.cbsnews.com/news/bexar-county-texas-deputy-jose-nunez-sexually-abused-undocumented-immigrant-girl-4-sheriff-says/?ftag=CNM-00-10aab8d&linkId=53151048)

These parent-free detention camps are a pedophile’s wet dream right now. Absolutely no system is in place to ensure that the kids aren’t being abused or neglected. These poor babies are really at the mercy of fate. But anything to keep those yucky illegals away, right?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GIGObuster](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/gigobuster/32/421_2.png) [@GIGObuster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GIGObuster)\
**Post date:** [June 20, 2018, 5:57am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/separating-immigrants-from-their-children-is-child-abuse/816206/377 "2018-06-20T05:57:06Z")

</div>

8

> [@Banquet\_Bear](#):
>
> .  
> To be fair, his latest post does help the discussion. The talking points used by the administration are a weapon. Being able to effectively counter them with the truth is what is needed, and if that means a few more posts about shoplifting so we can get things resolved then I think we should just get through it.

But what I also pointed was: “Does it mean that the rest that you did not comment was also not accurate?”

And of course, **Bricker** does not bother to reply to that. I was only pointing out that as the first offence and having children does not usually lead to being incarcerated, that is relevant, attempting to omit it does make it then less likely that the poster he was nitpicking was reporting something that he observed. Looks to me like grasping at straws that I was not looking to give to Bricker.

Of course, the other item that Republicans in Congress are with Trump liking what they are doing to spite their opponents does not deserve a comment from him either, as it would pull someone to question their representatives in Congress. Can’t have that if he is trying to avoid being voted out of the current Republican island.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Czarcasm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/czarcasm/32/4050_2.png) [@Czarcasm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Czarcasm)\
**Post date:** [June 20, 2018, 5:57am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/separating-immigrants-from-their-children-is-child-abuse/816206/378 "2018-06-20T05:57:12Z")

</div>

> [@Bricker](#):
>
> But there’s no debate on the “taking babies from mothers is bad,” point. I agree with it. Is it your desire that we do a series of posts in which each participant repeats, in rotation, his affirmation of that point?
> 
> And when, if ever, is the time to address the likelihood of claims like, “I have worked in child welfare for 23 years and have never seen a parent placed in jail for shoplifting?” Does that claim get insulated from any review, ever?

Did you see the news tonight and, if so, was the statement(which had to be pulled from you) “I oppose it. I think it’s cruel and unnecessary” all you had to say on the subject? I and My Beloved were shocked when we saw the report tonight, and I don’t think I can recall what we were talking about before we saw it…and we certainly didn’t just say anything like “I oppose it. I think it’s cruel and unnecessary” then go back to the conversation at hand.  
What does Trump have to do for you, _unsolicited_, to say “What he did was horrendous and I want to talk about it instead of any of the side issues”? How far does he have to go to really push your buttons emotionally?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bricker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/977dab/32.png) [@Bricker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bricker)\
**Post date:** [June 20, 2018, 6:09am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/separating-immigrants-from-their-children-is-child-abuse/816206/379 "2018-06-20T06:09:08Z")

</div>

> [@GIGObuster](#):
>
> 8
> 
> But what I also pointed was: “Does it mean that the rest that you did not comment was also not accurate?”
> 
> And of course, **Bricker** does not bother to reply to that.

Here is the rest:

> [@Ellecram](#):
>
> Parents do not lose their rights simply because they are incarcerated.

They lose some rights. They don’t lose all rights. They lose the right to live with their children.

> [@](#):
>
> If parents are incarcerated for serious crimes they still have the right to visit with their children and we make every effort to arrange this.

Absolutely. That’s a useful distinction to make: a person incarcerated for either pre-trial detention or pst-trial conviction will almost always be able to visit with their minor children, assuming the child’s custodian is amenable.

> [@](#):
>
> It is sometimes difficult based on the location of the jail site, the facility restrictions, the ages of the children, etc. but yes, there are visits.

Absolutely true.

> [@](#):
>
> I can’t believe how low this administration has fallen with respect to human rights and common human decency.

I can.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bricker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/977dab/32.png) [@Bricker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bricker)\
**Post date:** [June 20, 2018, 6:11am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/separating-immigrants-from-their-children-is-child-abuse/816206/380 "2018-06-20T06:11:00Z")

</div>

> [@Czarcasm](#):
>
> Did you see the news tonight and, if so, was the statement(which had to be pulled from you) “I oppose it. I think it’s cruel and unnecessary” all you had to say on the subject? I and My Beloved were shocked when we saw the report tonight, and I don’t think I can recall what we were talking about before we saw it…and we certainly didn’t just say anything like “I oppose it. I think it’s cruel and unnecessary” then go back to the conversation at hand.  
> What does Trump have to do for you, _unsolicited_, to say “What he did was horrendous and I want to talk about it instead of any of the side issues”? How far does he have to go to really push your buttons emotionally?

Trump is a venal, petty leader, and nothing so far particularly surprises me.

But if I wanted to talk about it, and not debate points in disagreement between the participants, that sounds like MPSIMS or BBQ.

Here in GD I see little point in assuring each other just how much we agree with each other.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/separating-immigrants-from-their-children-is-child-abuse/816206.md?page=18)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/separating-immigrants-from-their-children-is-child-abuse/816206.md?page=20)
