I simply do not think it is terribly inappropriate for a 15 year old to be driving. Yes it is illegal etc. but it hardly borders on bad parenting, child neglect or anything like that.
I suppose Mr. Blue Sky would blame a parent for letting their kid go to an R-rated movie and who died when the theater goes up in flame.
I guess I don’t understand why you’ve started a Pit thread when you don’t even know the answer to the question you consider so controversial. I’m not trying to take a swipe at you – I sincerely don’t understand where you’re coming from. Since you’re presumably angry at someone in this circumstance, who do you accuse of having done wrong?
Is there an answer to your question that you would consider a reasonable explanation of the circumstances?
And what kind of super-powers do adults have in the Blue Sky Universe that they can save themselves and their passengers when they are rear ended by a tractor trailers? :wally
Just MHO, but I think that many in this thread are unaware of how lax driving “laws” are enforced in rural areas of the US. Such laws can make perfect sense in an urban environment, in a town of 1900 maybe not so much.
I put it in the Pit because I figured it would go down the “irresponsible parenting” path.
Guess not.
If I’d put it in MPSIMS, it would’ve ended up here anyway, so I saved the Mods the effort.
Really, the only person who can answer my question would be the mother and I don’t look for her to even be able to think, much less answer the question (not to me specifically, of course). I feel that she will ultimately have to answer the question to someone, probably the state of Florida.
Indeed. Now, tell me, why do you believe your scenario #3 more likely than my scenario #2? The point of my post was to demonstrate how it could have been possible for an adult to have been driving and STILL had the same accident. I’m not sure what the point of yours was.
that’s one version. the others are equally as plausible. if any ONE fucking thing had been different, the car wouldn’t have been there to get hit:
one of the kids falls while going to the car, scrapes knee, takes a few minutes to get them all settled and in the car.
drive 5 MPH slower.
Drive 5 MPH faster
Miss turn and get lost
Truck driver stops for pee break.
Funeral procession interferes w/flow of traffic
15 year old suddenly gets her period and has to fumble in the bathroom
15 year old spends a few moments flirting w/boyfriend
Other driver on the road hits them first with minor fender bender.
etc etc etc etc
there’s’s any number of things that if it had happened that way would have changed the results.
that’s why they’re called accidents ya know?
you seem to be focused on exactly one fucking irrelevant detail that went into the tragedy.
This has been all over the local news (it’s about an hour or so from here). Today, they reported that the bus travelled 200 feet AFTER the impact, doing a 180 degree slide, to end up facing the opposite direction of the impact.
I’m trying to visualize this accident, and I can’t see any way that car(not a van, as originally reported) slowed the truck down very much. I guess you can assume that since the bus was unloading passengers, that the driver’s foot was on the clutch…however that is still one heck of an impact to push a bus that is basically sitting in neutral over 200 feet.
I’ll call your late Mom and raise with: Mom’s on time and now she’s dead too. So I guess you’re pitting the Mom here in an oblique sort of way given your next post too:
ps: I did read the thread, but I did not preview before you posted the first quote above.
Ok, so what’s your point? My point was to plausibly demonstrate that the accident could just as easily have occurred with a licensed adult behind the wheel. Do you persist in disputing this?
One report says there were no skid marks, but there was an indication that the driver tried to swerve at the last minute. He must having been going the speed limit or faster.
It’s not like the girl was say, 12. She was 15 and had a permit. She knew the rules of the road well enough to get that permit. And she was taking the kids home from school. Before church. That sounds like responsible behavior to me. If her parents had allowed her to make such a journey, that says they trust her to make the trip safely and responsibly. Which she did, apparently.
I could have been that girl. I started driving long before I was old enough to get my license and was such a responsible and careful driver that I was allowed to run a couple errands at 15. No one would have ever given me a second glance because I was so close to the legal driving age.
Plus, you have into account that rural communities may not be as stringent on “by the book” driving laws. It may be perfectly acceptable to the sherrif for that girl driving, even with all those kids.
Jesus Christ, Mr Blue Sky, I just don’t get why you’re so bent out of shape over her age/licence status. Direct your anger at the driver.
Upon preview: all my points have already been made. So, I’ll just agree with those other guys.