# sexual dalliances

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sexual-dalliances/368988>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [August 16, 2006, 6:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sexual-dalliances/368988 "2006-08-16T18:22:06Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gonzomax](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/e8c25b/32.png) [@gonzomax](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gonzomax)\
**Post date:** [August 16, 2006, 6:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sexual-dalliances/368988/1 "2006-08-16T18:22:06Z")

</div>

Should we expect polititians to delve into sexual dalliances. There are many examples but is it a result of a driven conquering personality that is necessary for politics. Perhaps ego. But it seems ingrained ,should it be part of our voting calculus.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jackknifed\_Juggernaut](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/9de053/32.png) [@Jackknifed\_Juggernaut](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jackknifed_Juggernaut)\
**Post date:** [August 16, 2006, 6:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sexual-dalliances/368988/2 "2006-08-16T18:29:44Z")

</div>

I think that your premise is that politicians delve more than non-politicians. I think this assumption needs to be demonstrated before any real debate can begin.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gonzomax](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/e8c25b/32.png) [@gonzomax](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gonzomax)\
**Post date:** [August 16, 2006, 6:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sexual-dalliances/368988/3 "2006-08-16T18:57:42Z")

</div>

Point was not to compare non pol and pol, but to say it is common enough to be a non factor.I am at this moment trying to obtain on the net the Senate divorce rate. Having trouble.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gonzomax](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/e8c25b/32.png) [@gonzomax](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gonzomax)\
**Post date:** [August 16, 2006, 7:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sexual-dalliances/368988/4 "2006-08-16T19:37:06Z")

</div>

Common knowledge presidential level  
Jefferson  
Cleveland  
FDR  
Harding  
Kennedy  
Eisenhower  
maybe Clinton

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jackknifed\_Juggernaut](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/9de053/32.png) [@Jackknifed\_Juggernaut](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jackknifed_Juggernaut)\
**Post date:** [August 16, 2006, 7:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sexual-dalliances/368988/5 "2006-08-16T19:46:43Z")

</div>

> [@gonzomax](#):
>
> …maybe Clinton

maybe? I don’t think that there’s much maybe about it.

I just want to add that I agree that personal sexual matters should not be part of our voting calculus. Unfortunately, there are lots of things that shouldn’t be, but are. There’s a reason that every American president has been married, straight (AFAWK), white and male.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![rjung](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/45deac/32.png) [@rjung](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/rjung)\
**Post date:** [August 16, 2006, 7:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sexual-dalliances/368988/6 "2006-08-16T19:47:22Z")

</div>

If a politician’s sex life does not impede his/her ability to do the job, I don’t care if they get off on dressing up in furry costumes and getting whipped by a leather-clad dominatrix. As long as I don’t have to see it, anyway…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [August 16, 2006, 7:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sexual-dalliances/368988/7 "2006-08-16T19:48:01Z")

</div>

I say we should hold pols to the same standards of sexual morality as anybody else – but those standards are controversial and in flux for most of the past century.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gonzomax](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/e8c25b/32.png) [@gonzomax](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gonzomax)\
**Post date:** [August 16, 2006, 8:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sexual-dalliances/368988/8 "2006-08-16T20:03:24Z")

</div>

50 percent and more divorce rate. What standards do we hold ourselves to. Do we actually expect more from them than we do ourselves. Who were the gay presidents?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Crotalus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/crotalus/32/41_2.png) [@Crotalus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Crotalus)\
**Post date:** [August 16, 2006, 8:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sexual-dalliances/368988/9 "2006-08-16T20:04:47Z")

</div>

I ascribe to the sentiment expressed in a remark attributed to Ross Perot: “If his wife can’t trust him, why should I?” My personal view is that married people who are unfaithful to their spouses have broken the most solemn promise most of us make. This influences how I vote; it’s not the sole factor, but it matters to me.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Antinor01](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/ecae2f/32.png) [@Antinor01](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Antinor01)\
**Post date:** [August 16, 2006, 8:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sexual-dalliances/368988/10 "2006-08-16T20:06:30Z")

</div>

> [@Jackknifed Juggernaut](#):
>
> maybe? I don’t think that there’s much maybe about it.
> 
> I just want to add that I agree that personal sexual matters should not be part of our voting calculus. Unfortunately, there are lots of things that shouldn’t be, but are. There’s a reason that every American president has been married, straight (AFAWK), white and male.

Nitpick, James Buchanan, the 15th president was a bachelor.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![XT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/xt/32/456_2.png) [@XT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/XT)\
**Post date:** [August 16, 2006, 8:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sexual-dalliances/368988/11 "2006-08-16T20:06:59Z")

</div>

> [@gonzomax](#):
>
> Should we expect polititians to delve into sexual dalliances. There are many examples but is it a result of a driven conquering personality that is necessary for politics. Perhaps ego. But it seems ingrained ,should it be part of our voting calculus.

If I understand the OP correctly (a tenuous proposition at best), he’s asking if we should expect politicians to have sexual dalliances. I don’t think we should EXPECT them too by any means…no more than we EXPECT anyone else to be unfaithful to their S.O.'s. We should probably acknowledge that, being human (well, some of them 😛 ) that such things WILL happen.

As to whether or not it makes a difference to the individual voter…well, thats another kettle of fish. While I think its safe to say that it makes no difference to SOME voters, it is also a fact that it DOES to others. I don’t think a one size fits all about ‘sexual dalliances’ is either realistic OR desirable with the voting public. Its like any other issue or idiosyncrasy of the politician in question (like some folks dislike Bush’s leering smile, say, while others don’t mind and dislike him for other reasons 😉 )…its all based on the individual and what they are looking for in a leader. For some its no big deal, for others its a matter of trust or perhaps expectation that our representatives SHOULD meet higher standards than the general mob, and for still others its a religious issue.

-XT

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gonzomax](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/e8c25b/32.png) [@gonzomax](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gonzomax)\
**Post date:** [August 16, 2006, 8:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sexual-dalliances/368988/12 "2006-08-16T20:07:51Z")

</div>

[http://www.trivia-library.com/b/was-american-founding-father-alexander-hamilton-gay-part-1.h](http://www.trivia-library.com/b/was-american-founding-father-alexander-hamilton-gay-part-1.h)  
Hamilton gay?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Antinor01](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/ecae2f/32.png) [@Antinor01](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Antinor01)\
**Post date:** [August 16, 2006, 8:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sexual-dalliances/368988/13 "2006-08-16T20:08:34Z")

</div>

> [@Crotalus](#):
>
> I ascribe to the sentiment expressed in a remark attributed to Ross Perot: “If his wife can’t trust him, why should I?” My personal view is that married people who are unfaithful to their spouses have broken the most solemn promise most of us make. This influences how I vote; it’s not the sole factor, but it matters to me.

In the case of someone like Bill Clinton, it seems pretty clear that Hillary knew of his sexual activities and either doesn’t care or hides it well.

How do we know that just because a pol has sex outside their marriage that there has been a breach of trust with the spouse?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![XT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/xt/32/456_2.png) [@XT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/XT)\
**Post date:** [August 16, 2006, 8:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sexual-dalliances/368988/14 "2006-08-16T20:09:53Z")

</div>

> [@gonzomax](#):
>
> Common knowledge presidential level  
> Jefferson  
> Cleveland  
> FDR  
> Harding  
> Kennedy  
> Eisenhower  
> maybe Clinton

If I understand what this cryptic comment means, you are saying that these presidents are commonly understood to have had affairs during their presidency…yes? While I think a few of these are assumptions (and Jefferson wasn’t even married while president), its pretty amusing you would put (maybe) by Clinton…one of the few we are SURE had an affair while president (and married…though to Hillary, so perhaps you don’t count that). 😛

-XT

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [August 16, 2006, 8:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sexual-dalliances/368988/15 "2006-08-16T20:40:08Z")

</div>

> [@Antinor01](#):
>
> Nitpick, James Buchanan, the 15th president was a bachelor.

[And probably gay.](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexuality_of_James_Buchanan)

[Lincoln too.](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexuality_of_Abraham_Lincoln)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lissa](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/85f322/32.png) [@Lissa](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lissa)\
**Post date:** [August 16, 2006, 11:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sexual-dalliances/368988/16 "2006-08-16T23:30:04Z")

</div>

> [@BrainGlutton](#):
>
> [And probably gay.](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexuality_of_James_Buchanan)
> 
> [Lincoln too.](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexuality_of_Abraham_Lincoln)

I don’t know enough about Buchanan to comment but I disagree with the conclusions reached in the Wiki article. The evidence it presents is extremely weak and can easily be explained when put into historical context. I won’t bore you with a lengthy refutation for each of its arguments. I’ll just say I believe it’s highly unlikely that Lincoln was gay.\*

\*_Actively_ gay. Who knows if he was attracted to men? He could have been. But I think it’s highly unlikely he acted upon it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Evil\_Captor](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/f17d59/32.png) [@Evil\_Captor](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Evil_Captor)\
**Post date:** [August 16, 2006, 11:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sexual-dalliances/368988/17 "2006-08-16T23:39:34Z")

</div>

Well, when one group of politicians gets all riled up about the sexual acitivities of another, the hypocrisy meter almost invariably goes up to ridiculously amusing levels. So I’m all for it. Cause it’s funny, and probably the best method available to make people properly cynical and disrespectful of our political leadership.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [August 17, 2006, 12:13am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sexual-dalliances/368988/18 "2006-08-17T00:13:48Z")

</div>

> [@xtisme](#):
>
> . . . its pretty amusing you would put (maybe) by Clinton…one of the few we are SURE had an affair while president (and married…though to Hillary, so perhaps you don’t count that). 😛
> 
> -XT

I chalk up to the unresolved, still-occasionally-debated question of whether blowjobs count.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Thudlow\_Boink](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/thudlow_boink/32/320_2.png) [@Thudlow\_Boink](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Thudlow_Boink)\
**Post date:** [August 17, 2006, 12:14am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sexual-dalliances/368988/19 "2006-08-17T00:14:22Z")

</div>

> [@Lissa](#):
>
> I don’t know enough about Buchanan to comment but I disagree with the conclusions reached in the Wiki article. The evidence it presents is extremely weak and can easily be explained when put into historical context. I won’t bore you with a lengthy refutation for each of its arguments. I’ll just say I believe it’s highly unlikely that Lincoln was gay.\*

Cecil on [Was Abraham Lincoln gay?](http://www.straightdope.com/columns/040402.html)  
As to the thread’s main topic, I sympathize both with **rjung** ’s and with **Crotalus** ’s points of view. On the one hand, I think, why should I care about a politician’s sex life, or anything else he does in private, if it isn’t directly relevant to how good a job he does? And it’s not at all clear to me, looking at history, that great leaders overall had either a higher sex drive or lower ability to keep their pants zipped than not-so-great leaders.

On the other hand, how well a person behaves himself sexually or keeps his marital vows can obviously relate to that person’s character, self-control, trustworthiness, and good judgment, which are important qualities for a leader to have.  
By the way, **gonzomax** , here are some question marks in case you’ve run out: ? ? ? ? ? ? ?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![XT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/xt/32/456_2.png) [@XT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/XT)\
**Post date:** [August 17, 2006, 1:48am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sexual-dalliances/368988/20 "2006-08-17T01:48:45Z")

</div>

> [@BrainGlutton](#):
>
> I chalk up to the unresolved, still-occasionally-debated question of whether blowjobs count.

😛 Are you married or seeing someone steadily? I suggest then simply asking your wife/SO that question and see what THEY say about it.

I think most reasonable people feel that ‘blowjobs count’ wrt infidelity. Besides, I’m frankly skeptical that Clinton NEVER did anything else while president (and I have about as much proof as you do that Lincoln was gay…probably more circumstantial evidence in fact 😉 ).

-XT

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sexual-dalliances/368988.md?page=2)
