Most of you are aware of the Oklahoma teacher’s strike. It wasn’t just about wages; also protesting about school supplies and textbooks. Most of the history books are from 1980:eek: It will be way more than 10 years before Stormy gets to Oklahoma. (not counting the ongoing stormy tornadoes)
Actually, he has (had?) 3 clients: Trump, Briody (the GOP mega-donor on whose behalf that Cohen paid over a million $$ to a Playboy playmate), and Sean Hannity.
Bet you didn’t see that coming.
I’ve been laughing about that for the past hour. Apparently Hannity didn’t know how to respond to this revelation at the beginning of his radio show, so he played some music and clips from the Comey interview while he pulled his thoughts together.
If Hannity wasn’t one of Cohen’s clients, saying, “no, he’s never been my lawyer” would have been easy. Therefore…
CBSNews.com has the Hannity bombshell as their top story.
So does NBCNews.com.
So does Politico.com.
So does CNN.com
WaPo and TheHill.com both have it high on the page, just below their top stories.
WSJ.com has it as a breaking story on top of the page.
But I’m just not seeing anything on FoxNews.com. Anyone have any idea why? That’s a head-scratcher.
So… Hannity’s saying that Cohen lied in court and that almost none of their correspondence should be covered by attorney-client privilege, right? This is good news.
They’re covering the real news, like:
“Stripper storms courthouse as Trump lawyer fights feds over ‘unprecedented’ evidence seizure”
“Even liberal media blasts ‘petty,’ ‘bitchy’ Comey amid book tour”
“Ex-FBI boss says Barack Obama ‘jeopardized’ DOJ’s credibility with Clinton email probe talk”
“Anti-Trump American history textbook ‘blatantly biased,’ critics say”
“Penn State drops homecoming ‘king and queen’ titles, changes to gender-neutral term”
Probably sex crazed pandas or penguins.
A Fox reporter at the courthouse mentioned the name once and then went on to other things.
Here’s the video I was taking about.
Does a lawyer have to have a contract of retainer in order to claim that a person is a client protected by privilege?
No, but as we shall see, it can get very messy without one