# Shooting a bullet into the barrel of another gun. I am skeptical. **URL:** \ **Category:** Factual Questions\ **Created:** [July 15, 2016, 1:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/shooting-a-bullet-into-the-barrel-of-another-gun-i-am-skeptical/759970 "2016-07-15T13:17:23Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 4\ **Page:** 2
**Author:** ![Pantastic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/3bc359/32.png) [@Pantastic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Pantastic)\ **Post date:** [July 15, 2016, 6:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/shooting-a-bullet-into-the-barrel-of-another-gun-i-am-skeptical/759970/21 "2016-07-15T18:52:17Z")
> [@msmith537](#): > > Another way to think of it - 1 billion is enough bullets to completely cover an area over 1 square mile with .44 bullet holes. Since WW2 came up, 100 billion bullets is a reasonable estimate for how many small arms rounds were fired during the war. If something was literally a one in a billion chance, you’d expect to see it about once every two weeks to a month (depending on what you use as a start date). > [@Urbanredneck](#): > > I once saw a picture in a history book of WW1 which showed a rifle where a German bullet did just that. It blew the top off the rifle. Rifle bullets are much higher velocity than pistol bullets, it’s not surprising that a rifle round would do much more damage. ---
**Author:** ![Machine\_Elf](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/82dd89/32.png) [@Machine\_Elf](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Machine_Elf)\ **Post date:** [July 15, 2016, 7:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/shooting-a-bullet-into-the-barrel-of-another-gun-i-am-skeptical/759970/22 "2016-07-15T19:54:52Z")
> [@Pantastic](#): > > Since WW2 came up, 100 billion bullets is a reasonable estimate for how many small arms rounds were fired during the war. If something was literally a one in a billion chance, you’d expect to see it about once every two weeks to a month (depending on what you use as a start date). Maybe it did happen that often. In the chaos of combat, a soldier might not know it had really happened, and might subsequently fire his own gun, making it impossible to ever really know. And maybe there were a handful who were aware that it had happened to them, and it became just one of those strange-but-true war stories that they took home with them (if they went home alive). I wouldn’t necessarily expect it to be something that was terribly well documented. > [@Pantastic](#): > > Rifle bullets are much higher velocity than pistol bullets, it’s not surprising that a rifle round would do much more damage. Or maybe the incoming round messed up the targeted gun, which was subsequently fired and did much greater damage to itself. [Sort of like firing a gun again after a squib load.](https://www.reddit.com/r/ThingsCutInHalfPorn/comments/1lv283/machine_gun_barrel_after_a_squib_773x580/) ---
**Author:** ![Sage\_Rat](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/sage_rat/32/399_2.png) [@Sage\_Rat](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sage_Rat)\ **Post date:** [July 15, 2016, 8:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/shooting-a-bullet-into-the-barrel-of-another-gun-i-am-skeptical/759970/23 "2016-07-15T20:32:01Z")
> [@watchwolf49](#): > > I’m not so much skeptical that it happened, the picture is convincing … I’d argue that “one in a billion” chance is a bit low … maybe more like “one in a trillion”. It’s probably far lower than that. If I remember correctly, police hit their target in a real world fight about 50% of the time. I assume that “hit” includes any part of the target’s body, not just center mass. If you figure the area of the silhouette of the target and divide that by the area of the gun nozzle, and halve it, that should be about the probability you would expect for a confrontation where the target is facing forward with their weapon brandished. I’m not sure what that is, but it’s probably more in the 10,000s range than the millions of trillions. ---
**Author:** ![Pantastic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/3bc359/32.png) [@Pantastic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Pantastic)\ **Post date:** [July 15, 2016, 8:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/shooting-a-bullet-into-the-barrel-of-another-gun-i-am-skeptical/759970/24 "2016-07-15T20:42:48Z")
> [@Machine\_Elf](#): > > Maybe it did happen that often. I was mostly putting the number out there so people would have a reference for how much ‘a billion bullets’ is. I would expect the chance for it to happen in the story to be something like the 1 in 1000 you estimated, but the chance on average over the course of WW2 to be much less. A huge portion of rounds fired in wartime would come from suppressive fire (especially from machine guns), which isn’t even aimed at a target but is intended to force people to stay in cover. > [@](#): > > Or maybe the incoming round messed up the targeted gun, which was subsequently fired and did much greater damage to itself. [Sort of like firing a gun again after a squib load.](https://www.reddit.com/r/ThingsCutInHalfPorn/comments/1lv283/machine_gun_barrel_after_a_squib_773x580/) It’s definitely possible for a rifle bullet to destroy a gun, here’s a picture of what happened to the gun that police sniper Michael Plumb shot out of a suicidal guy’s hand: [http://www.dispatch.com/content/graphics/2015/01/30/sniper3.jpg](http://www.dispatch.com/content/graphics/2015/01/30/sniper3.jpg) [Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/shooting-a-bullet-into-the-barrel-of-another-gun-i-am-skeptical/759970.md?page=1)