Shoplifting hypothetical

And you shouldn’t. In some municipalities, the store is required to sell at the lower price.

A requirement to sell at the lower of the posted or scanned price is common.

But where is it a rule that if a scan yields what is clearly the wrong item - at a price correct for that item but irrelevant to the actual one - it must be sold at a that price?

I don’t know of any requirement that the description match the item for the price rule to hold.

So if I can manage to affix the pricetag of a cheap item to an expensive one, I then have the right to buy it for pennies on the dollar?

Absolutely not. That is theft. You intentionally did it to benefit you - the store did not make a mistake that benefitted you. And if caught, you could be prosecuted.

Back to what the OP said: IMHO, the most likely scenario is that another customer purchased the gloves at another store, and they fell out of a shopping bag.

It can also get a cashier in trouble if they don’t call for a price check. Heaven forbid they want to keep their job.

Seriously? :dubious:

Yes - it would be indeed be a serious problem for stores to say that showing up at the checkout with an mislabeled item entitles the purchase at the wrong price. It would create a new and easy form of shoplifting.

People do try it, though.

This story always comes to mind when swapping prices and shoplifting is mentioned.

tl;dr: Pasted home-made UPC stickers over printed UPC on boxes of Legos to get a lower price.

No, that’s stealing.

Wait, if you already knew the answer, why’d you ask?
Also, it’s far from new, hell there was an old Saturday Night Live commercial about it way back in the day. They were selling a price marking gun that you could take to the store with you and put any price you want on all the items you were buying.

I believe it was a snarky reply to j666’s statement quoted above.

Another possibility for the gloves is that a return was accepted for an item the store doesn’t sell. Perhaps it was from JC Penney online, or some places will even accept returns from other stores. Whoever was restocking the return didn’t find a place for them, so just put them on the top of the rack.

The idea of switching price tags long predates SNL.

Which is why I’m skeptical that it would be typical for a store to be prohibited from nullifying a transaction that’s based on an obviously incorrect tag.