# Should businesses be allowed to be cashless?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-businesses-be-allowed-to-be-cashless/829796>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [February 18, 2019, 9:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-businesses-be-allowed-to-be-cashless/829796 "2019-02-18T21:44:48Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sisu](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/df705f/32.png) [@sisu](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/sisu)\
**Post date:** [February 19, 2019, 6:03am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-businesses-be-allowed-to-be-cashless/829796/21 "2019-02-19T06:03:23Z")

</div>

Oh in Australia everyone has a bank account and most have Visa Debit or at worst EftPOS cards, these normally don’t attract a fee. Great system.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Oswald\_Bastable](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/oswald_bastable/32/214_2.png) [@Oswald\_Bastable](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Oswald_Bastable)\
**Post date:** [February 19, 2019, 7:17am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-businesses-be-allowed-to-be-cashless/829796/22 "2019-02-19T07:17:52Z")

</div>

> [@septimus](#):
>
> What is the transaction fee charged these days to merchants who accept credit cards? For debit cards? Is that fee really significant less than the cost to the merchant of handling cash?

In the UK, for an SME business using one of the mobile payment companies (SumUp, iZettle, Square etc) fees are around 1.7% per transaction. I’m assuming it’s similar in the US. Whether that’s cheaper than cash handling depends on how you value the time it takes to bank that cash and the extra security involved in cash handling. Personally, I’d rather take the hit for card payments, and I assume larger companies can negotiate lower fees for card processing.

OB

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mijin](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mijin/32/9369_2.png) [@Mijin](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mijin)\
**Post date:** [February 19, 2019, 8:43am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-businesses-be-allowed-to-be-cashless/829796/23 "2019-02-19T08:43:53Z")

</div>

Right now I think governments are right to insist bricks and mortar retail still accept cash, for the reasons given.

However there will likely be a point where the number wanting to use cash will be so vanishingly small that such a law will not be enforced any more. At that point hopefully there is some kind of net for those left behind (eg some kind of debit card anyone is eligible for but can work in place of a credit card)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![UDS](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/ecae2f/32.png) [@UDS](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/UDS)\
**Post date:** [February 19, 2019, 8:54am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-businesses-be-allowed-to-be-cashless/829796/24 "2019-02-19T08:54:35Z")

</div>

> [@Mijin](#):
>
> Right now I think governments are right to insist bricks and mortar retail still accept cash, for the reasons given.

Governments typically don’t insist on this. The market does. Governments only insist that cash be accepted in settlement of debts, but not in other business or commercial transactions.

> [@Mijin](#):
>
> However there will likely be a point where the number wanting to use cash will be so vanishingly small that such a law will not be enforced any more. At that point hopefully there is some kind of net for those left behind (eg some kind of debit card anyone is eligible for but can work in place of a credit card)

The suggestion in this thread, I think, is that we are reaching this point now. Governments should either require business to accept cash, or require financial institutions to provide non-cash payment alternatives free of charge to the user. And the latter is problematic since there is presumably a class of person with whom financial institutions do not wish to deal on any terms, or for any purpose.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Quartz](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/quartz/32/267_2.png) [@Quartz](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Quartz)\
**Post date:** [February 19, 2019, 9:22am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-businesses-be-allowed-to-be-cashless/829796/25 "2019-02-19T09:22:07Z")

</div>

> [@Riemann](#):
>
> I believe that in most jurisdictions the concept of “legal tender” applies (if at all) only to existing debts.

> [@UDS](#):
>
> Legal tender can’t be refused _in settlement of a debt_.

Thanks. A nice distinction there.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mijin](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mijin/32/9369_2.png) [@Mijin](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mijin)\
**Post date:** [February 19, 2019, 9:41am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-businesses-be-allowed-to-be-cashless/829796/26 "2019-02-19T09:41:04Z")

</div>

> [@UDS](#):
>
> Governments typically don’t insist on this. The market does.

Is this descriptive or prescriptive?  
I know for example here in China there is such a law, and a store where purchases could only be made using a smartphone app was forced to accept cash.

> [@](#):
>
> The suggestion in this thread, I think, is that we are reaching this point now.

That would be a strange suggestion if so. In countries like the US, cash is still used for a large proportion of transactions.  
I wasn’t alluding to the point where cash is disfavored.  
I mean the point where cash is used so rarely that the cashier / waiter / automatic kiosk has to contact the manager because he / she / it doesn’t know what to do.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Broomstick](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/broomstick/32/246_2.png) [@Broomstick](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Broomstick)\
**Post date:** [February 19, 2019, 9:50am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-businesses-be-allowed-to-be-cashless/829796/27 "2019-02-19T09:50:17Z")

</div>

> [@Pithily\_Effusive](#):
>
> I’ll pose you one further. The existence of money at all in an economy can be shed. If everyone continues to do what they do; goods are manufactured and distributed, people go in take what they need, theft would have no incentive.

You have obviously never seen two children squabbling over identical toys, or who gets which piece of identically sized pie pieces.

Not to mention there will still be rare or one-of-a-kind items.

Assuming it’s not a post-scarcity society (which is way far off, if it is even possible) then certain times will require more time to accrue sufficient “credit” (or whatever) to get, in which case stealing is a short cut.

Then there’s stealing to f\*\*\* with someone because bullies and mean people exist.

There will still be motivation for theft.

> [@](#):
>
> Resale of something readily obtainable is ludicrous.

Again - antiques, unique items, etc. And some people like the buying/bartering of yard sales and flea markets as entertainment of a sort.

> [@](#):
>
> Hoarding money and calling it wealth would disappear as well.

What? You think an actual millionaire or billionaire has a room full of bills and coins? You funny.

> [@nightshadea](#):
>
> they all ready do … I can get my ssa on a government issued prepaid visa bank card which has to be accepted even if you don’t take credit cards

Unless, of course, a business has no capacity for taking cards at all - cash-only businesses are getting more and more rare but they still exist.

> [@](#):
>
> In ca they do the same for the cash/food aid although you can take the cash off the card at an atm …. but one day soon you probably wont be able to

That’s true in all 50 states. Probably other US territories as well.

> [@](#):
>
> Theres even cards that if your employer does direct deposit they can put your paycheck on a prepaid card just like the ssa one mentioned above

Significant fees on those. Much higher than standard credit and debit cards.

> [@](#):
>
> So the law cant really use poor people on benefits as an excuse as were well covered

In most states the only benefits-on-cards are either WIC or EBT - which are strictly food only benefits. For everything else they need cash or credit/debit.

> [@Chronos](#):
>
> How do you take cash in an online business? Is it fair that the cardless poor can’t use Amazon or eBay?

At the store where I work you can use cash to purchase cards for thinks like Google Play or Amazon and use those on-line.

> [@](#):
>
> The better solution is to enable people to have cards, so that it doesn’t matter if a business doesn’t take cash.

The only way a cashless society can work (and also be just) is if EVERYONE can get a credit-debit card, ideally without usurious fees

> [@Riemann](#):
>
> If the restriction was only to _credit_ cards, okay. But aren’t prepaid cards (essentially plastic cash) freely available to anyone?

Yes, if you’re willing to pay exorbitant fees. I’ve seen cards where just the “activation” and other initial fees can eat 25% of the value.

> [@PastTense](#):
>
> Yes and No. Yes: they are available to everyone. No: they are not free; there are substantial fees–monthly fees, transactions fees, reloading fees.

^ This.

> [@UltraVires](#):
>
> Can’t anyone go to Target or Wal-Mart and pay cash and get the equivalent in a Visa gift card? What fees are there for that?

Start around $4 for a $25 card and go up from there. So, 16% to start. Some re-loadable cards have re-loading fees, monthly fee, and so on that can really add up.

> [@Mijin](#):
>
> Right now I think governments are right to insist bricks and mortar retail still accept cash, for the reasons given.
> 
> However there will likely be a point where the number wanting to use cash will be so vanishingly small that such a law will not be enforced any more. At that point hopefully there is some kind of net for those left behind (eg some kind of debit card anyone is eligible for but can work in place of a credit card)

Here in the US? Ha!

That said - although most of the transactions at the store I work at are cashless we _still_ have cash involved in about 1/3 of our transactions. While they tend to be smaller amount there are exceptions - I have had someone pay a $900+ total in cash. So we aren’t going cashless any time soon, we can’t afford to lose 1/3 of our business.

(We also still take paper checks)

Another thing - the networks that allow for use of plastic instead of cash do, from time to time, have problems or stop working. If you have a cashless society then commerce stops when that happens. Cash, on the other hand, does not require batteries or wifi. In a heavily urban center that may not be a concern, but out in the boondocks which are as wired-up and have fewer folks to maintain and/or repair the system that might be a worry.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bryan\_Ekers](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bryan_ekers/32/183_2.png) [@Bryan\_Ekers](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bryan_Ekers)\
**Post date:** [February 19, 2019, 11:29am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-businesses-be-allowed-to-be-cashless/829796/28 "2019-02-19T11:29:48Z")

</div>

Heck, you can speed the process of going post-cash in America by expanding civil-forfeiture rules and letting police officers seize any amount of cash off any person at any time on the basis that it might be used to buy drugs.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kayaker](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kayaker/32/441_2.png) [@kayaker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kayaker)\
**Post date:** [February 19, 2019, 12:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-businesses-be-allowed-to-be-cashless/829796/29 "2019-02-19T12:44:53Z")

</div>

I was surprised a few years ago when I stopped at the DMV for a duplicate driver’s license and discovered _they didn’t accept cash_. I thought about it and said, “wow, they must really not trust you” and the clerk laughed.

My business happily accepts cash or credit card (no checks). About 80% of all transactions are plastic. I occasionally get an older farmer who owes me $310, waggles his brows, and says, “how about if I pay cash?” I’ll play along and tell him $300. He thinks I’m dodging taxes, but I’m not; it’s more complicated than it’s worth.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![doreen](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/858c86/32.png) [@doreen](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/doreen)\
**Post date:** [February 19, 2019, 12:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-businesses-be-allowed-to-be-cashless/829796/30 "2019-02-19T12:51:48Z")

</div>

> [@Littleman](#):
>
> Don’t all of those take ridiculous amounts for withdrawals?
> 
> I know the employer ones are bad fees out the wazoo when my little brother worked at checkers 20 percent of his pay could be gone in fees even being careful about it

Your brother wasn’t working under the current NY rules. In NY, for an employer to pay wages through a pre-paid debit card, there must be a no-fee atm within a reasonable distance of he employee’s home or job, there must be a place where the employee can withdraw the total amount of wages, the employer must notify the employee of these locations and there can be no fees for normal use of the card.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Grrr](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/grrr/32/146_2.png) [@Grrr](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Grrr)\
**Post date:** [February 19, 2019, 12:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-businesses-be-allowed-to-be-cashless/829796/31 "2019-02-19T12:54:33Z")

</div>

I know those reloadable check cards are pricey, but I don’t recall ever paying a fee for a Visa _gift_ card.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lord\_Feldon](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lord_feldon/32/341_2.png) [@Lord\_Feldon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lord_Feldon)\
**Post date:** [February 19, 2019, 1:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-businesses-be-allowed-to-be-cashless/829796/32 "2019-02-19T13:02:51Z")

</div>

> [@Grrr](#):
>
> I know those reloadable check cards are pricey, but I don’t recall ever paying a fee for a Visa _gift_ card.

[Here](https://i5.walmartimages.com/asr/a6038d80-cbf9-4e05-8bfc-f39e1b79cb3a_1.6ff3d7e0018e9f43ab412892dd934404.jpeg)’s one on sale at Walmart right now. “$100+5.38 purchase charge.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Babale](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/babale/32/15666_2.png) [@Babale](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Babale)\
**Post date:** [February 19, 2019, 2:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-businesses-be-allowed-to-be-cashless/829796/33 "2019-02-19T14:12:54Z")

</div>

> [@Lord\_Feldon](#):
>
> [Here](https://i5.walmartimages.com/asr/a6038d80-cbf9-4e05-8bfc-f39e1b79cb3a_1.6ff3d7e0018e9f43ab412892dd934404.jpeg)’s one on sale at Walmart right now. “$100+5.38 purchase charge.”

In my experience the fee is about that much regardless of the value of the card. So the bigger the card the lower the percent. Doesn’t help poor people too much, unless their employer pays their whole paycheck on one card, and handles the fee-- for the employer, thatg should be a miniscule expense.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Corry\_El](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/ecae2f/32.png) [@Corry\_El](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Corry_El)\
**Post date:** [February 19, 2019, 2:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-businesses-be-allowed-to-be-cashless/829796/34 "2019-02-19T14:43:05Z")

</div>

Prepaid cards aren’t all equally expensive. Here’s a list

> **[What Is a Prepaid Debit Card?](https://www.thebalancemoney.com/how-do-prepaid-cards-work-315070)**
>
> Prepaid cards allow you to spend with plastic but without a bank account or credit line. Learn how they work, along with the pros and cons.

The leading choice there is an AMEX one where the card is free online, though $3.95 it bought in a physical store, free to reload, though $4.95 monthly fee.

Also you can’t necessarily compare that to ‘free, free, free’. If you have a job which pays by check, you’ve got to cash the check to get paper cash, and that costs money also if you don’t have a bank account. And, there isn’t a fundamental economic reason banks would provide ‘free’ bank accounts just for the interest margin they can make on the balance in a zero interest checking account, irrespective of that balance, and of interest rates (a reduction in ‘free’ checking offers in recent years when short term interest rates in the US were near zero was not a coincidence).

Also, even people paid in paper money often have to pay by money order for some things, like rent. So cash directly costs the consumer in that case too (besides the cost of handling and protecting cash being indirectly factored into prices for all consumers).

Nor is it clear social policies, eg. forcing merchants to take cash by collective action, should encourage the use of cash when it facilitates tax cheating and criminal activity. Although that case, cash’s role in facilitating illegal activity, is a more populist v elite than right v left issue. People on the left might be more ready to force additional mandates on merchants or employers to secure more ‘free’ services, but it’s generally left leaning economist/academics who propose stuff like eliminating the $100 bill from circulation. Populists on the right are quite hostile to that idea.

It’s conceivable the evolution in payment methods could be something the govt shouldn’t get that involved in\*. Just conceivable, I’m not one to say the govt should never get involved in anything.

\*the most likely exception IMO is anti-trust aspect of a few networks setting fees on things, rather than various mandates to provide things ‘free’.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bump](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/7c8e57/32.png) [@bump](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bump)\
**Post date:** [February 19, 2019, 6:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-businesses-be-allowed-to-be-cashless/829796/35 "2019-02-19T18:12:29Z")

</div>

I’ll play devil’s advocate here…

Wouldn’t the businesses that deal with the non-banking customers pretty much have to accept cash, or else suffer?

This seems like a tempest in a teapot; what exactly are these situations where some business is going to do business in an area where people habitually transact in cash, and proclaim that they only take cards? That’s not going to be a very successful model.

I’d argue that the only needed legal protection would be that governmental agencies and regulated monopolies (like say… electric power companies) must accept cash, as they provide necessary services across the spectrum. But if a Subway decides to move into a lower income area and refuse to take cash? Big deal- they’re the ones who will get less business as a result.

Put another way, all those shitty bodegas are going to continue to take cash, because that’s how their customers pay. If 7-11 puts in a store down the road and takes only cards, they just cut out a huge number of customers, who will continue to shop at the bodegas.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![muldoonthief](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/muldoonthief/32/3188_2.png) [@muldoonthief](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/muldoonthief)\
**Post date:** [February 19, 2019, 7:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-businesses-be-allowed-to-be-cashless/829796/36 "2019-02-19T19:05:02Z")

</div>

> [@Grrr](#):
>
> I know those reloadable check cards are pricey, but I don’t recall ever paying a fee for a Visa _gift_ card.

A Visa gift card, which can be used anywhere Visa is accepted, nearly always has a fee. A store gift card, which can only be used in a particular store (or sometimes their sister stores owned by the same corporation) will generally have no fees, but of course has much more limited utility.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sisu](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/df705f/32.png) [@sisu](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/sisu)\
**Post date:** [February 19, 2019, 9:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-businesses-be-allowed-to-be-cashless/829796/37 "2019-02-19T21:08:30Z")

</div>

> [@UDS](#):
>
> or require financial institutions to provide non-cash payment alternatives free of charge to the user. And the latter is problematic since there is presumably a class of person with whom financial institutions do not wish to deal on any terms, or for any purpose.

Someone without a bank account would have a hard time in Australia, all pays go into the bank, all government rebates/welfare is via a bank account (with the exception of some areas that use a prepaid debit card) and all banks/credit unions offer debit Visa/Mastercards as standard.

Cheques are so rare these days, my mum sent a cheque to my 16 yo daughter and she looked at and said what do I do with this!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kenobi\_65](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kenobi_65/32/13178_2.png) [@kenobi\_65](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kenobi_65)\
**Post date:** [February 19, 2019, 9:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-businesses-be-allowed-to-be-cashless/829796/38 "2019-02-19T21:21:07Z")

</div>

> [@sisu](#):
>
> Someone without a bank account would have a hard time in Australia, all pays go into the bank, all government rebates/welfare is via a bank account (with the exception of some areas that use a prepaid debit card) and all banks/credit unions offer debit Visa/Mastercards as standard.

FYI, in the U.S., 7% of households are classified as “unbanked” (i.e., they don’t make use of any banking services whatsoever). This means that they don’t have checking accounts, debit cards, etc. The primary reason given for not being banked is not having enough cash to open and maintain an account.

Another 20% or so of U.S. households are classified as “underbanked.” These people make use of some bank services, but not others. They may have a checking account, or a savings account, but they probably don’t have both. Households also get classified as “underbanked” if they make use of alternative financial services (i.e., money orders, check-cashing stores, payday loans, rent-to-own, etc.) in addition to banks.

Sources:  
[https://www.ozy.com/acumen/one-out-of-every-4-americans-is-underbanked/87796](https://www.ozy.com/acumen/one-out-of-every-4-americans-is-underbanked/87796)  
[http://www.microbilt.com/news/article/unbanked-vs-underbanked-who-they-are-and-how-they-differ](http://www.microbilt.com/news/article/unbanked-vs-underbanked-who-they-are-and-how-they-differ)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![doreen](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/858c86/32.png) [@doreen](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/doreen)\
**Post date:** [February 19, 2019, 9:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-businesses-be-allowed-to-be-cashless/829796/39 "2019-02-19T21:37:27Z")

</div>

> [@bump](#):
>
> This seems like a tempest in a teapot; what exactly are these situations where some business is going to do business in an area where people habitually transact in cash, and proclaim that they only take cards? That’s not going to be a very successful model.

I don’t think that’s the issue, because you’re right, . No business in an area where people habitually use cash is going to decide to only take cards. But suppose I live in a lower income area, where everyone uses cash. But I work in a different area, where most people use cards, so I can’t buy a coffee or run errands on my lunch break.Or there’s no supermarket in my neighborhood, and the one in the next neighborhood over has decided to go cashless. Or I don’t live in a low-income neighborhood, but I don’t want to use cards because the stores can find out too much about me that way.

```
I'm not saying I agree with the proposed law- I haven't thought enough about it to take a position. But those are the sort of situations the proponents are thinking about.

```

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dewey\_Finn](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dewey_finn/32/4222_2.png) [@Dewey\_Finn](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dewey_Finn)\
**Post date:** [February 19, 2019, 9:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-businesses-be-allowed-to-be-cashless/829796/40 "2019-02-19T21:45:15Z")

</div>

> [@Aspidistra](#):
>
> Sparked off by a Guardian story: [New York to consider banning shops from going cashless | Business | The Guardian](https://www.theguardian.com/business/2018/nov/28/legislation-bans-cashless-business-policy-discrimination)
> 
> New York is considering banning the practise of having “cashless” businesses - where you can only pay for your goods by some sort of card.
> 
> The article points out that this practise excludes a whole swathe of poor and more vulnerable people, who may not own cards or bank accounts.

I’m pretty liberal, but this is a stupid argument. For example, the practice, at Thomas Keller’s NYC restaurant Per Se, of having a $355 chef’s tasting menu excludes a whole swathe of poor and more vulnerable people, who can not afford it. Should New York require that they have a less expensive tasting menu as well? Of course not. And similarly the cashless business exist alongside other business that accept cash, some of which are cash-only.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-businesses-be-allowed-to-be-cashless/829796.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-businesses-be-allowed-to-be-cashless/829796.md?page=3)
