# Should businesses be required to give Election Day off with pay?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-businesses-be-required-to-give-election-day-off-with-pay/707921>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [December 22, 2014, 4:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-businesses-be-required-to-give-election-day-off-with-pay/707921 "2014-12-22T16:28:52Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bone](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bone/32/407_2.png) [@Bone](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bone)\
**Post date:** [December 23, 2014, 5:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-businesses-be-required-to-give-election-day-off-with-pay/707921/61 "2014-12-23T17:23:12Z")

</div>

> [@Ravenman](#):
>
> So if someone doesn’t have an ID, they have to work every day.
> 
> What the hell…?

Maybe I wasn’t clear but you’re interpreting what I said in an odd way.

To work in the US, unless you have had continuous employment with the same employer since 1986, or are a worker on a job for less than 3 days, employees are required to submit, and employers are required to retain completed I-9 forms. This form requires ID that proves you are eligible to work in the US.

To get a day off, there is the supposition that you are actually employed. Since being employed overwhelmingly requires you to have had presented an ID to complete the I-9 form, to even have a day off work you would have had to have had an ID at some point.

If you’re thinking that the person could have lost their ID and they should still be able to get a day off, sure of course. But that’s not the point I was making. By them having a job in the first place, they had ID.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ravenman](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ravenman/32/2929_2.png) [@Ravenman](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ravenman)\
**Post date:** [December 23, 2014, 5:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-businesses-be-required-to-give-election-day-off-with-pay/707921/62 "2014-12-23T17:30:08Z")

</div>

> [@D\_Anconia](#):
>
> Since 1986, a legal ID is required to work in the first place.

> [@Bone](#):
>
> But that’s not the point I was making.

Working and not working isn’t the same. Requiring an ID to have a legal job is not the same as requiring an ID to allow a person not to show up to work. It’s like saying that a driver license is required to drive, and a driver license is required not to drive. It’s nonsensical.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bone](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bone/32/407_2.png) [@Bone](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bone)\
**Post date:** [December 23, 2014, 7:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-businesses-be-required-to-give-election-day-off-with-pay/707921/63 "2014-12-23T19:14:29Z")

</div>

> [@Ravenman](#):
>
> Working and not working isn’t the same. Requiring an ID to have a legal job is not the same as requiring an ID to allow a person not to show up to work. It’s like saying that a driver license is required to drive, and a driver license is required not to drive. It’s nonsensical.

Can you see the interpretation that I’ve tried to clarify? I know you don’t believe that’s the logical conclusion to draw, but I tried to explain it. You don’t need ID to get a day off per se. However, to get a day off in the first place, you would need an actual job to get a day off from. If you have a job that you are getting a day off from, the fundamental assumption is that you have an ID, since it is required to get a job in the first place.

In your example, it’s not saying \*‘that a driver license is required to drive, and a driver license is required not to drive. \*’ Instead it’s a driver’s license is required to drive, therefore to stop driving there is a fundamental assumption that there was a license to drive to start with - otherwise you aren’t stopping anything since you never started in the first place.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ravenman](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ravenman/32/2929_2.png) [@Ravenman](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ravenman)\
**Post date:** [December 23, 2014, 7:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-businesses-be-required-to-give-election-day-off-with-pay/707921/64 "2014-12-23T19:55:12Z")

</div>

You do realize how absurd the last several posts were, right? Well, your contention that opposition to making Election Day a holiday has anything to do with voter ID laws is even more nonsensical.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bone](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bone/32/407_2.png) [@Bone](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bone)\
**Post date:** [December 23, 2014, 8:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-businesses-be-required-to-give-election-day-off-with-pay/707921/65 "2014-12-23T20:10:34Z")

</div>

If you say so. You said:

> [@Ravenman](#):
>
> DC has adopted early voting. Beginning two weeks before election day, anyone can go to city hall (more or less). About 10 days out, anyone can go to a select number of community centers closer to their homes, which are open weekends and nights. This is in addition to traditional absentee ballots.
> 
> It isn’t free to the government to provide this early voting, but it relies heavily on volunteers to keep costs down; and overall if you want to vote in an election, everyone has ample opportunity to vote in a way that doesn’t involve shutting down the city and its businesses for a day.

I think nearly every argument in this thread in opposition to a holiday to vote would also apply in countering opposition to requiring an ID to vote as well. Both are related to voting and the lengths that society should adopt to encourage it. If you don’t think that’s worthwhile to explore so be it. Consider:

_It isn’t free to the government to provide [voter IDs], but it relies heavily on [existing infrastructure] to keep costs down; and overall if you want to vote in an election, everyone has ample opportunity to [acquire an ID] in a way that doesn’t involve [difficult means]_.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Smapti](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/smapti/32/17938_2.png) [@Smapti](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Smapti)\
**Post date:** [December 23, 2014, 8:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-businesses-be-required-to-give-election-day-off-with-pay/707921/66 "2014-12-23T20:19:37Z")

</div>

> [@Budget\_Player\_Cadet](#):
>
> You know, the birth of a mythological figure which may or may not actually have existed in the first place (as well as his death) gets a paid day off in virtually every industry. Given that, I think it’s kind of _incredibly ridiculous_ to complain about giving the single most important day for democracy in America (which happens only once every two years) the same treatment. Hell, you could make “actually voting” a predicate for getting the day off.

But unless you’re a government employee, the government does not _require_ your employer to give you a paid day off for any of those days. Any paid holidays you may have are the result of collective bargaining and/or your employer’s largesse.

I have Christmas as a guaranteed paid day off because I work for an employee-owned company and have a contract which is required to match or beat that which our unionized competitors have, and I like that I have that day off. The idea that the government should _require_ my employer to give it to me off, however, just strikes me as being outside their purview.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ravenman](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ravenman/32/2929_2.png) [@Ravenman](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ravenman)\
**Post date:** [December 23, 2014, 8:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-businesses-be-required-to-give-election-day-off-with-pay/707921/67 "2014-12-23T20:26:57Z")

</div>

> [@Bone](#):
>
> If you say so. You said:  
> I think nearly every argument in this thread in opposition to a holiday to vote would also apply in countering opposition to requiring an ID to vote as well. Both are related to voting and the lengths that society should adopt to encourage it. If you don’t think that’s worthwhile to explore so be it. Consider:
> 
> _It isn’t free to the government to provide [voter IDs], but it relies heavily on [existing infrastructure] to keep costs down; and overall if you want to vote in an election, everyone has ample opportunity to [acquire an ID] in a way that doesn’t involve [difficult means]_.

I understand now. Your argument relies on a basic logical fallacy, _argumentum ad Madlibs._

For example, if I say that people older than 18 should have the right to vote; it doesn’t mean that you can score points on my opinion by saying that [badgers] older than [2] should have the [obligation] to [eat toddlers].

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bone](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bone/32/407_2.png) [@Bone](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bone)\
**Post date:** [December 23, 2014, 8:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-businesses-be-required-to-give-election-day-off-with-pay/707921/68 "2014-12-23T20:31:31Z")

</div>

At this point it seems like you are willfully misunderstanding for some reason. Good luck with that.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Amateur\_Barbarian](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/59ef9b/32.png) [@Amateur\_Barbarian](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Amateur_Barbarian)\
**Post date:** [December 23, 2014, 9:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-businesses-be-required-to-give-election-day-off-with-pay/707921/69 "2014-12-23T21:00:43Z")

</div>

Buried in your posts seems to be support for all voters to have ID. Which you have connected to the idea of paid days off to vote. Despite your subsequent posts, the only connection between the arguments is that both contain the letters V, O, T and E.

No, there’s no reason to have a national, paid holiday for elections.

No, there’s no need to require photo ID of voters. (Get back to us on the argument when voter fraud exceeds a fraction of a percent overall, and cases of voter identity fraud exceed single digits.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iamthewalrus\_3](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/258eb7/32.png) [@iamthewalrus\_3](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iamthewalrus_3)\
**Post date:** [December 23, 2014, 9:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-businesses-be-required-to-give-election-day-off-with-pay/707921/70 "2014-12-23T21:58:39Z")

</div>

> [@Bone](#):
>
> The overwhelming response here that voting is not that difficult and a paid holiday is not necessary. But somehow requiring an ID is beyond the pale. Seems inconsistent to me.

I don’t think it’s inconsistent at all. In fact, even a cursory analysis of the effects of the two shows how different they are.

The reason that we don’t need a paid holiday is that it’s not that difficult for people with jobs to be able to vote. The lack of a paid holiday is not presenting a meaningful obstacle to people who want to vote doing so, so regulating a paid holiday is an unnecessary step.

The reason we shouldn’t have an ID requirement is that it sometimes _is_ that difficult for people without ID to get one. Note that in the “holiday” case, we need to consider people with full-time-ish jobs, whereas in this case we need to consider legal voters who don’t have an ID. People who don’t have any ID already are probably old, poor, marginalized, or disabled. Making those people get an ID is a meaningful obstacle in many cases.

Could you explain why you think it’s inconsistent?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![filmore](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/7993a0/32.png) [@filmore](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/filmore)\
**Post date:** [December 23, 2014, 10:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-businesses-be-required-to-give-election-day-off-with-pay/707921/71 "2014-12-23T22:08:32Z")

</div>

Not only is a meaningful obstacle, it’s an unnecessary one. An ID is not a necessary requirement to vote. Casting your vote is necessary to vote. Having a card with your picture on it is superfluous to the basic task.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MrDibble](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mrdibble/32/114_2.png) [@MrDibble](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MrDibble)\
**Post date:** [December 23, 2014, 10:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-businesses-be-required-to-give-election-day-off-with-pay/707921/72 "2014-12-23T22:26:57Z")

</div>

> [@Telemark](#):
>
> It’s different for sure, but in practice many (not all or even most) have it pretty good.

“21 days paid vacation, 12 effective sick days, paid maternity leave and 12\* public holidays” -level good? Because that’s what any cleaner gets.

\*13 in a voting year

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Telemark](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/telemark/32/372_2.png) [@Telemark](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Telemark)\
**Post date:** [December 23, 2014, 10:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-businesses-be-required-to-give-election-day-off-with-pay/707921/73 "2014-12-23T22:40:26Z")

</div>

> [@MrDibble](#):
>
> “21 days paid vacation, 12 effective sick days, paid maternity leave and 12\* public holidays” -level good? Because that’s what any cleaner gets.

Sure, more vacation is great, but I get effectively 6 weeks of vacation a year. Plus I can shift my hours as needed, work from home, take off early on Fridays when I’m headed north, etc. The only difference is we have fewer public holidays, I can live with that.

So, yeah, pretty good.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bone](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bone/32/407_2.png) [@Bone](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bone)\
**Post date:** [December 23, 2014, 10:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-businesses-be-required-to-give-election-day-off-with-pay/707921/74 "2014-12-23T22:50:22Z")

</div>

> [@iamthewalrus\_3](#):
>
> Could you explain why you think it’s inconsistent?

Ultimately I am indifferent on voter ID requirements. I don’t think it’s a big deal either way. Since my state already provides paid time to vote it never seemed to be a big deal to me either. For me this is an illustration of logical consistency.

Part of the rationale against holidays to vote is because working does not seem to be a significant obstacle to voting - there are absentee/mail in voting, extended voting times, plentiful polling locations, etc.

Part of the rationale against requiring an ID to vote is that it is in fact a burden to obtain an ID. But the thing is, I don’t agree it’s a burden to obtain ID anymore than it is for a person to take time from work to go vote.

The premise is that it is not a burden to either take time off work to vote, or obtain a proper ID. Therefore people should be expected to take time from work, and obtain an ID in order to vote. That is not to say that it is not a burden for everyone - it certainly would be. But that applies to each scenario as well. For every individual that struggles with obtaining an ID due to time/money, there will be those same employees who struggle with voting because of time/money.

I suppose if you reject the idea that getting an ID in order to vote is not a burden then there is no inconsistency.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_Second\_Stone](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/bbe5ce/32.png) [@The\_Second\_Stone](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Second_Stone)\
**Post date:** [December 23, 2014, 10:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-businesses-be-required-to-give-election-day-off-with-pay/707921/75 "2014-12-23T22:54:53Z")

</div>

We move election day to July 4th and keep it a holiday that every employee can take some time off to go and vote.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Mace](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_mace/32/185_2.png) [@John\_Mace](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Mace)\
**Post date:** [December 23, 2014, 11:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-businesses-be-required-to-give-election-day-off-with-pay/707921/76 "2014-12-23T23:06:25Z")

</div>

> [@The\_Second\_Stone](#):
>
> We move election day to July 4th and keep it a holiday that every employee can take some time off to go and vote.

If you listed the days when the most people are out of state, I bet that would be in the top 5. Why on earth would you schedule voting then?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_Second\_Stone](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/bbe5ce/32.png) [@The\_Second\_Stone](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Second_Stone)\
**Post date:** [December 23, 2014, 11:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-businesses-be-required-to-give-election-day-off-with-pay/707921/77 "2014-12-23T23:36:16Z")

</div>

There is vote by mail for people who are going to be out of state. Absentee balloting is a somewhat well established practice. I’d go for July 4 as being a day with a lot of sunlight and a lot of patriotic themes and think it might get more people to participate in democracy. I’m one of those people who thinks that lots of people voting would be a good thing and that making voting difficult is a bad thing. The mileage of others may vary.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Mace](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_mace/32/185_2.png) [@John\_Mace](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Mace)\
**Post date:** [December 24, 2014, 1:09am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-businesses-be-required-to-give-election-day-off-with-pay/707921/78 "2014-12-24T01:09:28Z")

</div>

The thesis here is that people need time off to vote. As already noted, if all states offered mail-in voting, problem solved. You’re assuming they all do, which is not true.

But still, having an election when many people are on vacation isn’t a good idea, since that’s not what people go on vacation for. It’s unclear that you’d get more votes, and you might get fewer.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_Second\_Stone](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/bbe5ce/32.png) [@The\_Second\_Stone](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Second_Stone)\
**Post date:** [December 24, 2014, 1:23am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-businesses-be-required-to-give-election-day-off-with-pay/707921/79 "2014-12-24T01:23:21Z")

</div>

I’m only familiar with one state’s laws, namely California. The employer is obliged to give the employee time to go vote and voting by mail is allowed. I also think that more people would vote on July 4 than the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November, one being a patriotic holiday devoted to parties and patriotic one-upsmanship, and the other being Tuesday. One being a long summer day, and the other a short, wet late autumn sort of day.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Melbourne](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/b5e925/32.png) [@Melbourne](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Melbourne)\
**Post date:** [December 24, 2014, 3:40am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-businesses-be-required-to-give-election-day-off-with-pay/707921/80 "2014-12-24T03:40:19Z")

</div>

Saturday folks, Saturday. What’s so complicated about that? No, it’s not perfect, that’s why you have early, postal, and absentee voting. Tuesday is not a magic day.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-businesses-be-required-to-give-election-day-off-with-pay/707921.md?page=3)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-businesses-be-required-to-give-election-day-off-with-pay/707921.md?page=5)
