# Should Chicks with Dicks be Allowed to Serve

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-chicks-with-dicks-be-allowed-to-serve/527875>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [February 6, 2010, 2:08am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-chicks-with-dicks-be-allowed-to-serve/527875 "2010-02-06T02:08:08Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 7\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_Flying\_Dutchman](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/9fc348/32.png) [@The\_Flying\_Dutchman](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Flying_Dutchman)\
**Post date:** [February 6, 2010, 2:08am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-chicks-with-dicks-be-allowed-to-serve/527875/1 "2010-02-06T02:08:08Z")

</div>

in the military ?

I have no problem at all with gays and completely altered or non altered transexuals in the military, but chicks with dicks, uh uh.

I think its hard for most people to take these particlular trans people seriously, suggesting problems to me with combat unit cohesion. It doesn’t help me when the only exposure I’ve had to these particular people is in a porn video which caught me by surprise.

Yet I would have no problem with guys without dicks.

Seriously though, can we draw the line at chicks with dicks not eligible for military service ?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![2ply](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/2/b2d939/32.png) [@2ply](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/2ply)\
**Post date:** [February 6, 2010, 2:18am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-chicks-with-dicks-be-allowed-to-serve/527875/2 "2010-02-06T02:18:57Z")

</div>

You’re a fucking idiot.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [February 6, 2010, 2:19am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-chicks-with-dicks-be-allowed-to-serve/527875/3 "2010-02-06T02:19:18Z")

</div>

> [@The\_Flying\_Dutchman](#):
>
> I think its hard for most people to take these particlular trans people seriously, suggesting problems to me with combat unit cohesion.

“Unit cohesion” is what happens when the barracks clown puts Superglue in the K-Y tube. 😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Odesio](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/odesio/32/20003_2.png) [@Odesio](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Odesio)\
**Post date:** [February 6, 2010, 2:25am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-chicks-with-dicks-be-allowed-to-serve/527875/4 "2010-02-06T02:25:07Z")

</div>

Of all the rude, bigoted, and moronic things I’ve seen posted here this one just stands out for its stupidity.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Der\_Trihs](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/der_trihs/32/233_2.png) [@Der\_Trihs](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Der_Trihs)\
**Post date:** [February 6, 2010, 2:33am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-chicks-with-dicks-be-allowed-to-serve/527875/5 "2010-02-06T02:33:08Z")

</div>

> [@The\_Flying\_Dutchman](#):
>
> Seriously though, can we draw the line at chicks with dicks not eligible for military service ?

No. If they are healthy and willing let them serve, and what equipment they have is their business alone.

And referring to pre-op transsexuals with a porn phrase like “chicks with dicks” is generally not a respectful way to refer to them. Rather like referring to women as “sex crazed sluts”, which is also a phrase you see in porn but not normally elsewhere. Would you say “should sluts be allowed to serve in the military” instead of “should women be allowed to serve in the military” and expect a serious response?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Marley23](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/45deac/32.png) [@Marley23](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Marley23)\
**Post date:** [February 6, 2010, 2:37am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-chicks-with-dicks-be-allowed-to-serve/527875/6 "2010-02-06T02:37:20Z")

</div>

I can see this is not going to fly as a debate. If you want to discuss the subject, **The Flying Dutchman** , start a new thread and ask the question without any words that are obviously flat-out offensive.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Marley23](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/45deac/32.png) [@Marley23](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Marley23)\
**Post date:** [February 6, 2010, 3:44am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-chicks-with-dicks-be-allowed-to-serve/527875/7 "2010-02-06T03:44:04Z")

</div>

> [@2ply](#):
>
> You’re a fucking idiot.

Even if the OP is trolling, you’re not allowed to respond to his posts this way. This is a formal warning not to do this again.
