# Should Gender and Race be a factor in Legal Compensation?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-gender-and-race-be-a-factor-in-legal-compensation/769791>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [October 26, 2016, 5:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-gender-and-race-be-a-factor-in-legal-compensation/769791 "2016-10-26T17:14:41Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 3\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Czarcasm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/czarcasm/32/4050_2.png) [@Czarcasm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Czarcasm)\
**Post date:** [October 26, 2016, 5:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-gender-and-race-be-a-factor-in-legal-compensation/769791/1 "2016-10-26T17:14:41Z")

</div>

[Apparently it often is,](https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/business/wonk/settlements/?hpid=hp_hp-top-table-main_settlements-810pm-2%3Ahomepage%2Fstory) according to this Washington post article.

> [@](#):
>
> In one case, when a 6-year-old girl and a male fetus were killed in the same car crash, the settlement for the fetus was calculated to be up to 84 percent higher than the girl’s, according to court records.

Should there be any relationship between fairness and accuracy when it comes to compensation, and how accurate _are_ those charts that are being used?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Velocity](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/velocity/32/18006_2.png) [@Velocity](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Velocity)\
**Post date:** [October 26, 2016, 6:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-gender-and-race-be-a-factor-in-legal-compensation/769791/2 "2016-10-26T18:16:31Z")

</div>

I’m torn on this. On the one hand, I think the emphasis should be more on penalizing the lead-coating behavior, or penalizing the car-crash behavior, than on compensating for the damages. So race or gender shouldn’t matter. If you coated building interiors in lead paint, you have caused physical harm, regardless of race or gender - in the same way that if you murder a black woman, you should incur the same penalty, legally, as if you murdered a white man.  
But - if we go by compensation mindset - if I were to be hit by a car and paralyzed, I’d miss out on maybe $2.5 million in life earnings. If Stephen Curry were to be hit by a drunk driver and paralyzed, he’d be missing out on maybe $250 million in life earnings. So it wouldn’t be fair to compensate Curry only as much as the $2.5 million I’d receive.  
So - is it about compensation, or is it about punishment?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Czarcasm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/czarcasm/32/4050_2.png) [@Czarcasm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Czarcasm)\
**Post date:** [October 26, 2016, 6:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-gender-and-race-be-a-factor-in-legal-compensation/769791/3 "2016-10-26T18:23:55Z")

</div>

There is also the matter of codifying, and perpetuating, race and gender discrimination. The settlements are based on what people will earn…but who knows what race and gender walls will fall in the far(or even near) future, making the charts used obsolete? They are projections based on _today’s_ society-will the effected be able to go back to the courts later for a readjustment if society looks more favorably on those that aren’t white and male?
