# Should "Hot Naked Babe" threads be in Cafe Society or MPSIMS?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-hot-naked-babe-threads-be-in-cafe-society-or-mpsims/204569>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [September 29, 2003, 10:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-hot-naked-babe-threads-be-in-cafe-society-or-mpsims/204569 "2003-09-29T22:46:47Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lissener](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lissener/32/6139_2.png) [@lissener](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/lissener)\
**Post date:** [September 29, 2003, 10:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-hot-naked-babe-threads-be-in-cafe-society-or-mpsims/204569/1 "2003-09-29T22:46:47Z")

</div>

Every once in a while a [thread](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?threadid=214286) crops up in Cafe Society where a bunch of horny het boys get together to slobber about some porn actress’s tits or this or that Playboy model.

Now, I don’t mind what people do in their own bedrooms, as long as they don’t shove their lifestyle choices down my throat.

Since what’s discussed in these threads is very specifically NOT the photography, but the TITs, etc., no one can seriosly make the claim that they’re “arts” discussions.

Is it just me, or should these threads more properly take place in MPSIMS?

Well, obviously, they should more _properly_ take place in the dank, dark-paneled basement bedrooms these dopers rent from their mothers, but as far as the SDMB goes, I mean.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dantheman](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dantheman/32/9421_2.png) [@dantheman](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/dantheman)\
**Post date:** [September 29, 2003, 11:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-hot-naked-babe-threads-be-in-cafe-society-or-mpsims/204569/2 "2003-09-29T23:01:31Z")

</div>

I’m assuming this is a rhetorical question, since of course a question about this message board that was looking for an answer would be in ATMB.

Since it’s not in that forum, would you be so kind as to clarify what you mean by “show their lifestyle choices down my throat”? Are you being ironic?

And, of course, no one is forced to read anything on here, to my knowledge. (I say that in case someone’s holding a poster hostage: “You MUST … READ… ZE PIT!!”)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dinoboy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/65b543/32.png) [@dinoboy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/dinoboy)\
**Post date:** [September 29, 2003, 11:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-hot-naked-babe-threads-be-in-cafe-society-or-mpsims/204569/3 "2003-09-29T23:03:41Z")

</div>

Maybe we could get a new forum with an ‘x’ rating? 😉

but what would we call it?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![hebesphenomegacorona](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/b9e5f3/32.png) [@hebesphenomegacorona](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/hebesphenomegacorona)\
**Post date:** [September 29, 2003, 11:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-hot-naked-babe-threads-be-in-cafe-society-or-mpsims/204569/4 "2003-09-29T23:19:02Z")

</div>

PORNLAND!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![wring](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/838e76/32.png) [@wring](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/wring)\
**Post date:** [September 29, 2003, 11:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-hot-naked-babe-threads-be-in-cafe-society-or-mpsims/204569/5 "2003-09-29T23:20:17Z")

</div>

my guess is that this is a rhetorical device, to display the counterpart to the folks who come into threads where same-gender liking folks are busy flirting and whatnot. the reference to ‘lifestyle’ being shoved down ones throat was my biggest hint.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lissener](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lissener/32/6139_2.png) [@lissener](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/lissener)\
**Post date:** [September 30, 2003, 1:15am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-hot-naked-babe-threads-be-in-cafe-society-or-mpsims/204569/6 "2003-09-30T01:15:24Z")

</div>

nope, can’t parse that, wring. Can you try again for me?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Khadro](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/f07891/32.png) [@Khadro](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Khadro)\
**Post date:** [September 30, 2003, 1:23am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-hot-naked-babe-threads-be-in-cafe-society-or-mpsims/204569/7 "2003-09-30T01:23:39Z")

</div>

I assume you are talking about [Playboy ?s](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?threadid=214286).

Why not just not open the thread?

Or Pornland, I’m fine with either solution.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JRDelirious](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jrdelirious/32/9531_2.png) [@JRDelirious](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JRDelirious)\
**Post date:** [September 30, 2003, 2:13am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-hot-naked-babe-threads-be-in-cafe-society-or-mpsims/204569/8 "2003-09-30T02:13:27Z")

</div>

Besides, the referenced thread involves a straighforward series of questions and answers as to who has or has not been featured in the magazine in recent years. Only maybe two or at most three, out of fifteen posts at the time I write this, make what would be understood as a “slobbering” comment – and one of them contained also useful information as to the question.

Playboy being a major pop-media outlet, it’s a fair topic for CS as long as the thread is kept clean. And like I said there, if threads about _Enterprise_ that are 50%+ "slobbering"over Hoshi and T’Pol are CS material…

But the thing is, as an example of what this OP sets forth, that thread is a poor one as its contents, as of the time of this OP, were overwhelmingly non-prurient. Which is why \*\* wring\*\* theorizes that your OP is meant ironically, **lissener**.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JRDelirious](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jrdelirious/32/9531_2.png) [@JRDelirious](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JRDelirious)\
**Post date:** [September 30, 2003, 2:17am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-hot-naked-babe-threads-be-in-cafe-society-or-mpsims/204569/9 "2003-09-30T02:17:20Z")

</div>

…or in other words, **wring** sees it as a how you’re giving an example of how silly it sounds like when antigays make a big stinkin’ deal out of gays just being themselves.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![fruitbat](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/58f4c7/32.png) [@fruitbat](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/fruitbat)\
**Post date:** [September 30, 2003, 2:22am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-hot-naked-babe-threads-be-in-cafe-society-or-mpsims/204569/10 "2003-09-30T02:22:51Z")

</div>

I honestly don’t recall any regular and known posters blinking a proverbial eye when a homosexual poster makes reference to an attractive male, celebrity or otherwise. I am open to being proven wrong, however. I can’t see why such a fuss is being made over a harmless thread that may or may not be posted in the wrong forum.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Odesio](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/odesio/32/20003_2.png) [@Odesio](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Odesio)\
**Post date:** [September 30, 2003, 3:25am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-hot-naked-babe-threads-be-in-cafe-society-or-mpsims/204569/11 "2003-09-30T03:25:03Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by lissener \*  
> \*\*  
> Now, I don’t mind what people do in their own bedrooms, as long as they don’t shove their lifestyle choices down my throat.

\*\*

Please explain to the rest of the class how any thread on the SDMB can shove something down your throat.

Marc

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Road\_Rash](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/a8b319/32.png) [@Road\_Rash](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Road_Rash)\
**Post date:** [September 30, 2003, 4:01am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-hot-naked-babe-threads-be-in-cafe-society-or-mpsims/204569/12 "2003-09-30T04:01:47Z")

</div>

Well, lissener, because of you I went to a thread that I would have just skipped the title and not read without reading your rant. Plus I posted!

You kind of remind me of the people who protested Married With Children. Rather then having the desired effect, it propelled the show to far greater heights. I found nothing worse than some mild locker room talk. No members getting flamed. No toes being stepped on. Actually, a rather dull thread of no great consequence. A thread that you can easily ignore, or walk away from.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tars\_Tarkas](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/6a8cbe/32.png) [@Tars\_Tarkas](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tars_Tarkas)\
**Post date:** [September 30, 2003, 4:32am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-hot-naked-babe-threads-be-in-cafe-society-or-mpsims/204569/13 "2003-09-30T04:32:14Z")

</div>

Jesus Christ, go Fuck yourself, **lissener**. Cafe Society is not your personal playground. Welcome to the world of having a choice not to click on threads.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Michael\_Ellis](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/977dab/32.png) [@Michael\_Ellis](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Michael_Ellis)\
**Post date:** [September 30, 2003, 5:20am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-hot-naked-babe-threads-be-in-cafe-society-or-mpsims/204569/14 "2003-09-30T05:20:13Z")

</div>

I, once again, agree with our Martian friend.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AncientHumanoid](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ancienthumanoid/32/278_2.png) [@AncientHumanoid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/AncientHumanoid)\
**Post date:** [September 30, 2003, 3:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-hot-naked-babe-threads-be-in-cafe-society-or-mpsims/204569/15 "2003-09-30T15:18:29Z")

</div>

Wring his little neck!

Stab his eyes out!

;j

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![wring](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/838e76/32.png) [@wring](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/wring)\
**Post date:** [September 30, 2003, 5:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-hot-naked-babe-threads-be-in-cafe-society-or-mpsims/204569/16 "2003-09-30T17:00:27Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by JRDelirious \*  
> \*\*…or in other words, **wring** sees it as a how you’re giving an example of how silly it sounds like when antigays make a big stinkin’ deal out of gays just being themselves. \*\*

yep.

of course, I could be wrong.  
😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![rjung](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/45deac/32.png) [@rjung](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/rjung)\
**Post date:** [September 30, 2003, 7:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-hot-naked-babe-threads-be-in-cafe-society-or-mpsims/204569/17 "2003-09-30T19:24:07Z")

</div>

Yes, please!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lieu](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/c2a13f/32.png) [@lieu](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/lieu)\
**Post date:** [September 30, 2003, 7:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-hot-naked-babe-threads-be-in-cafe-society-or-mpsims/204569/18 "2003-09-30T19:51:09Z")

</div>

That one chick had a nice epiglottis.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dangerosa](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/22d042/32.png) [@Dangerosa](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dangerosa)\
**Post date:** [September 30, 2003, 8:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-hot-naked-babe-threads-be-in-cafe-society-or-mpsims/204569/19 "2003-09-30T20:05:52Z")

</div>

I find tits to be very arty. And I have an Art History degree making me qualified to bullshit convincingly on what Art is.

Nudes have always been art. Sorry if that offends you.

(What a hunk o’ manhood on that David, huh? And I’ve always wondered about those perky breasts on Hindu sculpture - an indication of fertilility via lactation - or did Hindu sculptors just have a thing for perky tits?)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ryle\_Dup](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/5f9b8f/32.png) [@Ryle\_Dup](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ryle_Dup)\
**Post date:** [September 30, 2003, 8:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-hot-naked-babe-threads-be-in-cafe-society-or-mpsims/204569/20 "2003-09-30T20:18:28Z")

</div>

Nice [tits](http://www.favonius.com/furzefield/birds/tits.jpg)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/should-hot-naked-babe-threads-be-in-cafe-society-or-mpsims/204569.md?page=2)
