The Indiana House of Representatives Ways and Means Committee passed a bill establishing a Northwest Indiana Stadium Authority to finance, construct and lease a stadium by a 24-0 margin. The Bears are looking at a tract of land near Wolf Lake in Hammond, Ind.
“The passage of SB 27 would mark the most meaningful step forward in our stadium planning efforts to date,” the team said in a statement. “We are committed to finishing the remaining site-specific necessary due diligence to support our vision to build a world-class stadium near the Wolf Lake area in Hammond, Indiana.”
Oh, they absolutely are, much as they were trying to play Chicago off of Arlington Heights in 2024.
It’s the apparent lying to both states now, clearly in the name of “dealmaking,” that is making the Bears look particularly bad, IMO. They lied to Illinois about why they didn’t want to have a meeting on the legislation today, and (maybe) lied to Indiana about how committed they are to the Hammond stadium.
The Indiana legislature’s amended bill for a Chicago Bears stadium project is finally up, and we can start to get a slightly better sense of what it would entail in terms of public costs. Tax expenditures would include: a city of Hammond admissions tax, Lake County and Porter County food and beverage tax surcharges, a Hammond food and beverage tax surcharge, a Lake County hotel tax surcharge, what looks like local income and sales taxes from a stadium district, and state sales taxes from a stadium district. The stadium authority would also own the stadium and lease it to the Bears (terms very much TBD), so it would presumably be exempt from property taxes.
Googling, the Chicago metro area has a population of over nine million while Des Moines, Iowa is only about 700,000. So roughly a tenth the size. Not really able to offer the same level of support.
FWIW, the Green Bay metro area (~335,000) is about half the size of the Des Moines metro. The Packers, of course, are essentially “Wisconsin’s Team,” and draw support from the bigger cities/metros of Milwaukee and Madison.
However, the fact that there is an NFL team in a small city is an artifact of the league’s beginnings, the Packers being publicly-owned (with clauses that prevent someone from attempting to buy and move them), and the team being able to, for the last 60+ years, benefit from the NFL’s television contracts which divide TV revenue equally. A city the size of Green Bay (or even bigger) would never get a new/relocated NFL franchise today.
The major stadiums/stadia housing major-league teams in Montreal were all privately built. The Bell Centre (hockey, concerts, etc.) is privately owned by the Molson family - as is the minor league Centre Bell in nearby Laval. Saputo Stadium houses the MLS team - privately built/owned by the Saputo family. Percival Molson stadium houses the CFL team - built from a donation from Percival Molson, who died in WW1. It is owned by McGill University, but has had some publicly funded upgrades over the tears,
On the other hand - the Olympic Stadium (“Big Owe”) which houses no team at the moment, was built with public money.
It appears that a lot of idiots in Indiana think they can score political points by giving their tax dollars to the Bears, thus making a point about how Indiana’s policies are more “business-friendly” than Indiana. If a bunch of MAGAt fools want to bankrupt their school systems in order to subsidize my football team, I’m actually completely OK with that.