Should the US lower its immigration numbers?

No no no. Nationalism distracts from economic reform.

There may be some social utility in nationalist restrictions on immigration in a society with a strong sense of commonality. Like Iceland or somewhere, perhaps.

The positive effects of such a cohesive national identity don’t appear to be operative in this country, which automatically divides its people into White, Black, & Latin. We don’t see ourselves as one people. Juan García from Houston is cousin to Ramón Ramírez from Managua. Shaniqua Owsley from Chicago is cousin to Brenda Luttrell from St. Vincent. Jim Schoeberl from St. Louis is cousin to Uwe Mueller from Munich. But Jim, Juan, & Shaniqua are “different races” in this country. The national boundary is less important* in the eyes of the people* than the lines between ethnic ancestries or languages.

Sure, you can get Black Anglos to resent lighter-skinned Latins, if you push a wedge. But Latins will often help other Latins, & USA Blacks will connect with other Blacks from the Caribbean as their own kind. And Whites will connect with white Europeans as their own kind. Their are finer ethnic distinctions, sure, but even then, a Finnish-American is cousin to a Finn.

So the spirits of the people mock this national boundary you think is important.

The reality is that to some White Anglo ruling-class type, Africa on the other side of town is almost as foreign & possibly more hateful as Africa across the sea.

Even within a color group, the working class do not have so many brothers or allies in the ruling class.

Real economic reform for working-class people, in a democracy, requires powerful organization. Like labor unions & political parties. More working-class numbers in the political arena can help.

Unfortunately, due to the self-perception of Yanks as three races, immigrants from any race other than the majority are looked at as fearsome aliens, just like the minorities that are already here. And here the trouble really sets in.

I don’t know what to do about it other than to fight against racial, ethnic, & yes, national-origin “othering.” A racially partitioned USA would soon be a poor & abused Black-istan next to a rich & nasty White-istan, which would probably be supporting street gangs & terrorists in Latino-land, assuming the last were allowed even to exist.

That would do nothing but hasten the flow of jobs outward. Immigrants, whether low-skilled or high-skilled, are a net asset to an economy. They create value through their work and help expand the economy, creating even more jobs.

Citation? Where is the evidence, particularly, in relation to low skilled migrants, that there is an overall improvement in the quality of life for *individual *people? Even as economic output goes up, overall quality of life can decline (Los Angeles?).

Also, you seem obsessed with economic issues. What about congestion, community social cohesion, stress on resources & infrastructure, environmental damage, the carbon footprint etc?

Carbon footprint? Are you under the impression that these people don’t exist until they immigrate?

It’s telling that liberals, normally so critical about greed, the bottom line, the profit motive, etc., turn into zealous free-market capitalists the second they think immigration can be spun as a way for us to make more money or raise our standard of living. I think it’s yet more evidence that their real motivation is simply to destroy America by turning it into a non-white, third-world country.

People in high income countries have far greater carbon footprints than people in middle or low income countries. When people move from low income countries to high income countries they end up consuming greater resources & their carbon footprint increases dramatically.

http://www.footprintnetwork.org/en/index.php/GFN/page/ecological_footprint_atlas_2008/

Good luck with that. What you call “othering” is a deep-seated human instinct every bit as powerful as sex. Given their choice, most people prefer to associate with others like themselves in terms of race, ethnicity, social class, education, and religion, and they tend to be suspicious or hostile to those outside their “tribe.” I don’t know how you propose to get people to stop following instincts that evolved over millions of years, but I do know that sooner or later, one way or another, your war against human nature will be lost.

Wow. A living, breathing strawman.

Nope, an actuality. I still remember how Bill Maher whooped and said “Can’t wait for it to happen!” when one of his guests brought up the probability that whites will be a minority in the US within a few decades. At that moment he became the poster boy for the left’s bitter anti-white prejudice.

Nah, just a silly bed sheet party. Keep on marching brothers! :smiley:

Not to mention that infamous Tim Wise blog post that made the rounds a few months ago. Oh, sure, when you attempt to confront them about it they deny it and claim you’re attacking a straw men, but when they speak freely and spontaneously they openly admit it.

Bill Maher is a stand up comic. Anyway, I was referring more to “destroying America by turning it into a third world country”.

In any event, Maher’s guest was unlikely to have suggested that whites will be a minority in the US within a few decades, since that isn’t going to happen. Whites will probably cease to make up the majority of the population in a few decades, which is completely different.

Arcite, I think RNATB was referring to your beliefs as the sort of thing that would be accused of being a straw man if the left brought it up.

You want a white country for you & your children? Go to Europe, or the British Isles, have a great time. Join the BNP or the Swedish Democrats. This country, this climate, is not for White Power. You’ll just burn like an overcooked turkey in the summer anyway.

I find it interesting that a certain proportion of the population are horrified by the prospect that they might end up in the minority; a situation that must be avoided at all costs (even though as RNATB states that’s not going to happen), while at the same time not showing any sympathy for those who are currently in this minority state and have been for their entire lives. I guess no one fears being repressed more than a repressor.

Disclaimer: I as as white as they come, and view the increase of non-whites in my area with a shrug.

I see. Because nobody civiiized lives south of the Rio Grande or north of the St. Lawrence, right? And particuarly nobody from Asia?

How do you know there is no sympathy for minorities? Are you aware of affirmative action?

@ Polycarp,

Look at my earlier posts and links about the relatively low academic achievement of mexican migrants over several generations - which is of course what necessitates the affirmative action referred to above. That is the concern spelled out here.

Bill Maher was the snarky host of a second rate talk show, and a mediocre mind masquerading as intellectual. You only have to watch his inept documentary about religion to know that. It was every bit as exasperatingly stupid as Ben Stein’s film about evolution.

Only if you have very strange definitions of majority and minority, but it’s not the first time I’ve seen words acquire strange new meanings in the mouths of lefties. If non-whites are the majority, then whites are a minority. No matter how you look at it, and no matter how you phrase it, losing our majority status can’t possibly be a good thing for whites.

I see no great virtue in being sympathetic to minorities. They will always put their political and economic interests ahead of ours and care little about the fairness of it all as long as they get what they want. There is never going to be a color-blind society, and there will never be an end of racial and ethnic politics. In any case, only whites are seriously expected not to care about race.

:rolleyes: Not wanting my country to turn into a third world shit hole doesn’t make me–or anyone else–a represser.

That’s just golden. An opinion piece about protecting the environment from illegals, written by a flaky AGW denier who would happily clear-cut or burn every national park in this country if it would even slightly benefit a corporation. Next up, Dr. Dobson on how illegal immigration is preventing gay marriage from becoming legal.

His point was that those who are the most against opening up the immigration flood-gates are typically also those who are against affirmative action, such as yourself.