Should the US relief effort in Haiti include immigration of refugees?

Absolutely not for a variety of reasons.

I would think the criteria would be hard to define. Even if defined it would be abused. Not maybe abused but absolutely abused. Those Hatians with connections or money would get to the top of the line. Not only would this hurt those who really needed the help but it would already be a further brain drain (using the notion that a number of those clever enough to get on any list are probably fairly entrepenurial people) which would further cripple Hati’s recovery.

Lastly, how many should we take? All of them? Should we take refugees from every natural disaster around the planet?

The answer is of course, no. We help them rebuild. We look to acheivements of cities after natural disasters and we apply those rules to Hati. We stay involved through free trade and perhaps real aid for longer than just the basic recovery from the earthquake. But no, we don’t take in endless streams of refugees.

Oh, of course! Why didn’t the rest of us think of that? All we needed to do was to get all those injured, starving, dehydrated, and diseased refugees to get up and walk two hundred kilometres over poorly maintained, earthquake-ravaged roads, or alternatively through densely forested and mountainous terrain, to the other side of the island, where the local infrastructure has surely been designed to accommodate the rapid absorbtion and treatment of several hundred thousand physically and economically devastated people.

News flash: It is “the same peoples” all over the earth. We’re all human. We’re all capable of the same empathy, charity, and helpfulness, limited only by the resources at our disposal. And the US has a hell of a lot more resources than the Dominican Republic.

Depends if you are prepared for the fiscal costs from low skill migration during high unemployment & possibility of creating a high crime underclass.

The most through and investigations of the fiscal impacts of immigration, by the National Research Council, found that low-skill immigration costs $120.000 per immigrant, in 2009 dollars. They even used the over-optimistic assumption that immigrants 100% converged to natives in 3 generations (not true empirically).

So the fiscal cost of 50% of Haiti immigrating to the US would be $600 billion. That is comparable to the direct costs of the Iraq war so far.

And not he alone.

I agree, the US should just leave & let the looters do what they want.

I do not believe that it is good policy for the United States to take in earthquake related refugees. It is not a good long term strategy compared to providing aid to assist the country in recovering.

That said, I do agree with the temporary moratorium on deportations and the temporary refugee status allocated to individuals already in the country. Ordinarily I would be against activity that rewarded illegal activity but it strikes me as cruel to send people back into the maelstrom that is earthquake hit Haiti. While Haiti does not look like a pleasant place at the best of times, there is a world of difference between that and the sudden disorientating destruction that is the current situation.

Might be better than the alternative.

Didn’t Africa already ask for them to move back to Africa?

Why not let half of them move to Africa, and the other half move to Communist China?

Problem solved!

Who in the hell pooped in your Wheaties? Wait, I know…her first name rhymes with “Smellin’” and her last name rhymes with “Berry”…wait, what’s her name, she’s that new intrusive moderator, hangs in the game room being overbearing on smack talk, idk…any ideas?

Make the electrocution short, it was only a joke after all.

It could help, but remember, the actual damage is largely in Port-au-Prince. A lot of people could simply be evacuated to other parts of the country. Cap Haitien could probably take a good number, & camps could be built in the countryside in the central part of the country for most of those made homeless.